Clin Endosc.  2024 Nov;57(6):790-797. 10.5946/ce.2024.110.

Development of colonic stent simulator using three-dimensional printing technique: a simulator development study in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2MEDICAL IP, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Interventional Research Center, M. I. Tech Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek, Korea
  • 4Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background/Aims
Colonic stenting plays a vital role in the management of acute malignant colonic obstruction. The increasing use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and the diverse challenges posed by colonic obstruction at various locations underscore the importance of effective training for colonic stent placement.
Methods
All the components of the simulator were manufactured using silicone molding techniques in conjunction with three-dimensional (3D) printing. 3D images sourced from computed tomography scans and colonoscopy images were converted into a stereolithography format. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymers have been used in fused deposition modeling to produce moldings.
Results
The simulator replicated the large intestine from the rectum to the cecum, mimicking the texture and shape of the human colon. It enables training for colonoscopy insertion, cecum intubation, loop reduction, and stenting within stenotic areas. Interchangeable stenotic modules for four sites (rectum, sigmoid colon, descending colon, and ascending colon) were easily assembled for training. These modules integrate tumor contours and blood vessel structures with a translucent center, allowing real-time visualization during stenting. Successful and repeatable demonstrations of stent insertion and expansion using the reusable SEMS were consistently achieved.
Conclusions
This innovative simulator offers a secure colonic stenting practice across various locations, potentially enhancing clinical outcomes by improving operator proficiency during actual procedures.

Keyword

Colonoscopy; Intestinal obstruction; Self expandable metallic stents; Simulation training

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and fabrication of a colonic stent simulator. (A) Automated segmentation of the colon from contrast-enhanced computed tomography. (B) 3D images of an artificial whole colon and its individual segments generated using modeling software. (C) A silicone-based colon model and malignant stenotic module were produced through 3D printing. (D) All colon parts were assembled in the body case. (E) Intraluminal view of 3D-printed model.

  • Fig. 2. Reusable self-expandable metal stent using a funnel-shaped reconstruction device.

  • Fig. 3. Interchangeable colonic stenotic modules. (A) Ascending colon stenosis. (B) Descending colon stenosis. (C) Sigmoid colon stenosis. (D) Rectum stenosis.

  • Fig. 4. Details of the colonic stenotic module. (A) The internal form of stenosis incorporates tumor contour and surface blood vessel structure, making it appear realistic. (B) The center of the stenosis module is made of a translucent material, allowing for visual observation during stent insertion.

  • Fig. 5. Stent insertion procedures using our colonic stent simulator.


Reference

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71:209–249.
Article
2. Cheynel N, Cortet M, Lepage C, et al. Trends in frequency and management of obstructing colorectal cancers in a well-defined population. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50:1568–1575.
Article
3. Frago R, Ramirez E, Millan M, et al. Current management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2014; 207:127–138.
Article
4. Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Oncologic outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent insertion as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided colon cancer obstruction: comparison with nonobstructing elective surgery. World J Surg. 2009; 33:1281–1286.
Article
5. Dohmoto M. New method: endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Dig. 1991; 3:1507–1512.
6. Cennamo V, Luigiano C, Coccolini F, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28:855–863.
Article
7. Zhang Y, Shi J, Shi B, et al. Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:110–119.
Article
8. Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, et al. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:76–81.
Article
9. Leitman IM, Sullivan JD, Brams D, et al. Multivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from the initial surgical management of obstructing carcinoma of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 174:513–518.
10. De Ceglie A, Filiberti R, Baron TH, et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013; 88:387–403.
Article
11. Kim DH, Lee HH. Colon stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructive colorectal cancer management. Clin Endosc. 2024; 57:424–433.
Article
12. Han SH, Lee JH. Colonic stent-related complications and their management. Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:415–419.
Article
13. Jung MK, Park SY, Jeon SW, et al. Factors associated with the long-term outcome of a self-expandable colon stent used for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:525–530.
Article
14. Yoon JY, Jung YS, Hong SP, et al. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for technical and clinical failures of self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:858–868.
Article
15. Small AJ, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH. Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction: long-term outcomes and complication factors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:560–572.
Article
16. Whitson MJ, Williams RL, Shah BJ. Ensuring quality in endoscopic training: tools for the educator and trainee. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 24:354–363.
Article
17. Khan R, Grover SC. A standardized technique for gastroscopy: still missing? Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8:E1231–E1232.
Article
18. Finocchiaro M, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Hernansanz A, et al. Training simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy: current and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13:1427.
Article
19. Kim Y, Lee JH, Lee GH, et al. Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators. Clin Endosc. 2023; 56:1–13.
Article
20. El-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJ, et al. Review of the use of simulators in learning revascularization techniques. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 69:415–424.
Article
21. Kan X, Ma T, Lin J, et al. Patient-specific simulation of stent-graft deployment in type B aortic dissection: model development and validation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2021; 20:2247–2258.
Article
22. Zhao S, Wu W, Samant S, et al. Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:16486.
Article
23. Geraghty J, Sarkar S, Cox T, et al. Management of large bowel obstruction with self-expanding metal stents: a multicentre retrospective study of factors determining outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16:476–483.
Article
24. Williams D, Law R, Pullyblank AM. Colorectal stenting in malignant large bowel obstruction: the learning curve. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011; 2011:917848.
Article
25. Lee JH, Yoon JY, Park SJ, et al. The learning curve for colorectal stent insertion for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Gut Liver. 2012; 6:328–333.
Article
26. Lee HJ, Park SJ, Cheon JH, et al. What is the necessity of endoscopist for successful endoscopic stenting in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30:119–125.
Article
27. Tang MH, Ross T, Yeo SA, et al. Colonic stenting for malignant large bowel obstruction is safe and effective: a single-surgeon experience. Singapore Med J. 2019; 60:347–352.
Article
28. Campbell KL, Hussey JK, Eremin O. Expandable metal stent application in obstructing carcinoma of the proximal colon: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40:1391–1393.
Article
29. Repici A, Adler DG, Gibbs CM, et al. Stenting of the proximal colon in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction: techniques and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:940–944.
Article
30. Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kang DW, et al. Clinical benefits and oncologic equivalence of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:153–158.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr