Korean J Intern Med.  2024 Sep;39(5):855-864. 10.3904/kjim.2023.207.

Effect of abatacept versus csDMARDs on rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea
  • 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
  • 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
  • 6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 8Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
  • 9Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
  • 10Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 11Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background/Aims
To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).
Methods
This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation.
Results
The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable.
Conclusions
Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Keyword

Arthritis, rheumatoid; Lung diseases, interstitial; Disease progression; Abatacept; Antirheumatic agents
Full Text Links
  • KJIM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr