Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother.  2024 Jan;6(1):26-32. 10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e5.

Diverse perspectives on remote collaborative care for chronic disease management

• Baik SY
• Park H
• Shinn J
• Kim HS

• KMID: 2551341
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e5

Abstract

Remote collaborative care is a program that improves medical services by linking local and remote physicians with residents in areas where access to medical facilities is limited, utilizing information and communication technology. As a result, patients can obtain medical advice and counseling at local hospitals without needing to travel to distant facilities. This care model involves communication between doctors, facilitating the accurate transfer of medical information and reducing the risk of misunderstandings. For instance, managing conditions such as blood pressure or blood glucose is more straightforward because a local hospital can assess the patient's status while a remote hospital simultaneously provides high-quality, specialized medical services. With the rise in poorly controlled hypertension or diabetes, the need for remote collaborative care has also increased. This care model enables local hospitals to maintain continuous patient care with the support of remote facilities. This is particularly true following acute cardiovascular treatment, where local hospitals, assisted by remote institutions, can safely offer high-quality services such as rehabilitation and follow-up care. Although remote hospitals have many advantages with the increasing number of patients, many difficulties remain in commercializing unsystematized remote collaborative care. Specifically, low reimbursements for medical services must be addressed, proper equipment is needed, more time and effort must be invested, and the liability issue must also be dealt with. Nevertheless, remote collaborative care using information and communication technology will be necessary in the future. Medical staff need to objectively examine the advantages and disadvantages of remote collaborative care from various perspectives and find ways to revitalize it.

Keyword

Communication; Hypertension; Information technology; Telemedicine

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Realistic example of remote collaborative care.

• 

  Fig. 2. Advantages and disadvantages of remote collaborative care.

Reference

1. Snoswell CL, Chelberg G, De Guzman KR, Haydon HH, Thomas EE, Caffery LJ, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: a systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare. 2023; 29:669–84.

2. Snoswell CL, Stringer H, Taylor ML, Caffery LJ, Smith AC. An overview of the effect of telehealth on mortality: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Telemed Telecare. 2023; 29:659–68.

3. Pierce RP, Stevermer JJ. Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare. 2023; 29:3–9.

4. Kim HS, Hwang Y, Lee JH, Oh HY, Kim YJ, Kwon HY, et al. Future prospects of health management systems using cellular phones. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 20:544–51.

5. Kim HS, Sun C, Yang SJ, Sun L, Li F, Choi IY, et al. Randomized, open-label, parallel group study to evaluate the effect of internet-based glucose management system on subjects with diabetes in China. Telemed J E Health. 2016; 22:666–74.

6. Xiao K, Yeung JC, Bolger JC. The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023; 49:9–15.

7. Kis A, Razek T, Grushka J, Boulanger N, Watt L, Deckelbaum D, et al. Surgical, trauma and telehealth capacity in Indigenous communities in Northern Quebec: a cross-sectional survey. Can J Surg. 2023; 66:E572–9.

8. Kim HS. Towards telemedicine adoption in Korea: 10 practical recommendations for physicians. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36:e103.

9. Whitfield J, LePoire E, Stanczyk B, Ratzliff A, Cerimele JM. Remote collaborative care with off-site behavioral health care managers: a systematic review of clinical trials. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2022; 63:71–85.

10. Swar S, Rimal P, Gauchan B, Maru D, Yang Y, Acharya B. Delivering collaborative care in rural settings: integrating remote teleconsultation and local supervision in rural Nepal. Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70:78–81.

11. Rojas G, Guajardo V, Martinez P, Castro A, Fritsch R, Moessner M, et al. A remote collaborative care program for patients with depression living in rural areas: open-label trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20:e158.

12. Zerna C, Jeerakathil T, Hill MD. Telehealth for remote stroke management. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34:889–96.

13. Wu Z, Xu J, Yue C, Li Y, Liang Y. Collaborative care model based telerehabilitation exercise training program for acute stroke patients in China: a randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020; 29:105328.

14. Curtis S, Martin H, DiNella M, Lavallee B, Chartrand C, McLeod L, et al. Kidney check point-of-care testing-furthering patient engagement and patient-centered care in Canada’s rural and remote indigenous communities: program report. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021; 8:20543581211003744.

15. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare; Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. OECD health statistics 2022. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2023.

16. Hodgkins M, Barron M, Jevaji S, Lloyd S. Physician requirements for adoption of telehealth following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. NPJ Digit Med. 2021; 4:19.

17. Hyun DY. Legal regulations on telemedicine and their problems. Korean Soc Law Med. 2022; 23:3–33.

18. Jull J, Sheppard AJ, Hizaka A; Inuit Medical Interpreter Team, Barton G, Doering P, et al. Experiences of Inuit in Canada who travel from remote settings for cancer care and impacts on decision making. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21:328.

19. Pan E, Cusack C, Hook J, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Bates DW, et al. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2008; 14:446–53.

20. Song SY. [Why we don't do home-based medical care or visiting healthcare service? “It's lower than the outpatient profit”] [Internet]. The Korean Doctor's Weekly; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.docdocdoc.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3010822.

21. Hayashi Y, Yokoyama Y, Kazama T, Hirayama D, Nakase H. Report on a new remote collaborative medical care system: construction and operation of a remote collaborative medical care network for inflammatory bowel disease using information and communication technology in Hokkaido. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2022; 119:830–8.

22. Tangari G, Ikram M, Ijaz K, Kaafar MA, Berkovsky S. Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2021; 373:n1248.

23. Kim HS, Yoon KH. Lessons from use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in digital healthcare. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020; 35:541–8.

24. Korea Law Translation Center. Medical Service Act. Act No. 18468 (September 24, 2021), Article 34, Paragraph (1). Korea Legislation Research Institute; [updated 2023 Dec 20; cited 2023 Nov 28]. Available from: https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=64153&lang=ENG.

25. Melillo P, Orrico A, Scala P, Crispino F, Pecchia L. Cloud-based smart health monitoring system for automatic cardiovascular and fall risk assessment in hypertensive patients. J Med Syst. 2015; 39:109.

26. Kim HS, Choi W, Baek EK, Kim YA, Yang SJ, Choi IY, et al. Efficacy of the smartphone-based glucose management application stratified by user satisfaction. Diabetes Metab J. 2014; 38:204–10.