Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother.  2024 Jan;6(1):33-39. 10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e2.

Current status of remote collaborative care for hypertension in medically underserved areas

• Baik SY
• Kim KM
• Park H
• Shinn J
• Kim HS

• KMID: 2551342
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e2

Abstract

Background
Remote collaborative care (ReCC) is a legally recognized form of telehealth that facilitates communication between physicians. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of ReCC services and establish a foundation for the usefulness and effectiveness of ReCC.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Digital Healthcare Information System (DHIS) managed by the Korea Social Security Information Service. We extracted data on patients who were registered from January 2017 through September 2023 to investigate the effects of various factors.
Results
A total of 10,407 individuals participated in the remote collaborative consultation service provided by the DHIS. Of these participants, those aged ≥80 years represented 39.2% (4,085 patients), while those aged 70 to 79 years comprised 36.9% (3,838 patients). The conditions treated included hypertension, affecting 69.2% (7,203 patients), and diabetes, affecting 21.1% (2,201 patients). Although various measurement items were recorded, most data beyond blood pressure readings were missing, posing a challenge for analysis. Notably, there was a significant reduction in blood pressure that was sustained at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-baseline (all P<0.05).
Conclusions
Owing to the lack of data, follow-up assessments for conditions other than hypertension proved to be challenging. Medical staff should increase their focus on and engagement with the system. Remote consultations have demonstrated efficacy in managing hypertension in medically underserved areas, where access to healthcare services is often limited. This suggests the potential for expanded use of remote chronic care in the future.

Keyword

Remote collaborative care telehealth; Telemedicine; Hypertension

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Changes in blood pressure by (A, B) sex and (C, D) age. (A, C) Systolic blood pressure. (B, D) Diastolic blood pressure. Visits occurring within 1 to 3 months were labeled as “1M,” those within 3 to 6 months as “3M,” visits within 6 to 12 months as “6M,” and any visits after 12 months as “12M.” *P<0.05 (paired t-test from baseline).

Reference

1. Park JI, Lee HY, Kim H, Lee J, Shinn J, Kim HS. Lack of acceptance of digital healthcare in the medical market: addressing old problems raised by various clinical professionals and developing possible solutions. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36:e253.

2. Kim HS. Apprehensions about excessive belief in digital therapeutics: points of concern excluding merits. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35:e373.

3. Kim HS, Yoon KH. Lessons from use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in digital healthcare. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020; 35:541–8.

4. Swar S, Rimal P, Gauchan B, Maru D, Yang Y, Acharya B. Delivering collaborative care in rural settings: integrating remote teleconsultation and local supervision in rural Nepal. Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70:78–81.

5. Hayashi Y, Yokoyama Y, Kazama T, Hirayama D, Nakase H. Report on a new remote collaborative medical care system -construction and operation of a remote collaborative medical care network for inflammatory bowel disease using information and communication technology in Hokkaido. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2022; 119:830–8.

6. Korea Law Translation Center. Medical Service Act. Act No. 18468 (September 24, 2021), Article 34, Paragraph (1). Korea Legislation Research Institute; 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 1]. Available from: https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=64153&lang=ENG.

7. Gasvaer JI, Jepsen R, Heldal I, Sudmann T. Supporting collaboration in rehabilitation trajectories with information and communication technologies: scoping review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023; 10:e46408.

8. Clavagnier I. Telemedicine, remote collaboration. Rev Infirm. 2017; 66:24–6.

9. Zhou Y, Luo B, Sang J, Li C, Zhu M, Zhu Z, et al. A cloud-based consultation and collaboration system for radiotherapy: remote decision support services for community radiotherapy centers. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023; 229:107270.

10. Branzan Albu A, Laurendeau D, Gurtner M, Martel C. A web-based remote collaborative system for visualization and assessment of semi-automatic diagnosis of liver cancer from CT images. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005; 111:75–8.

11. Lv H, Yang G, Zhou H, Huang X, Yang H, Pang Z. Teleoperation of collaborative robot for remote dementia care in home environments. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020; 8:1400510.

12. Rojas G, Guajardo V, Martínez P, Castro A, Fritsch R, Moessner M, et al. A remote collaborative care program for patients with depression living in rural areas: open-label trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20:e158.

13. Bae JH, Han KD, Ko SH, Yang YS, Choi JH, Choi KM, et al. Diabetes fact sheet in Korea 2021. Diabetes Metab J. 2022; 46:417–26.

14. Yan Y, Wu T, Zhang M, Li C, Liu Q, Li F. Prevalence, awareness and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk factors in Chinese elderly population. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22:1382.

15. Kim HC, Lee H, Lee HH, Lee G, Kim E, Song M, et al. Korea hypertension fact sheet 2022: analysis of nationwide population-based data with a special focus on hypertension in the elderly. Clin Hypertens. 2023; 29:22.

16. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R; Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360:1903–13.

17. Uchiyama S, Takanashi S, Takeno M, Gono T, Kaneko Y, Takeuchi T, et al. Should we reconsider the definition of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis in an ageing society? Mod Rheumatol. 2022; 32:323–9.

18. Zeyfang A, Wernecke J, Bahrmann A. Diabetes mellitus at an elderly age. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2021; 129(S 01):S20–6.

19. Lucchi T. Dyslipidemia and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Minerva Med. 2021; 112:804–16.

20. Kim HS, Hwang Y, Lee JH, Oh HY, Kim YJ, Kwon HY, et al. Future prospects of health management systems using cellular phones. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 20:544–51.

21. Shigekawa E, Fix M, Corbett G, Roby DH, Coffman J. The current state of telehealth evidence: a rapid review. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37:1975–82.

22. Kim HS, Kim H, Lee S, Lee KH, Kim JH. Current clinical status of telehealth in Korea: categories, scientific basis, and obstacles. Healthc Inform Res. 2015; 21:244–50.

23. Camarines TM, Camarines JC. Discussing data security and telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022; 44:e449–50.

24. Ahmad RW, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Yaqoob I, Ellahham S, Omar M. The role of blockchain technology in telehealth and telemedicine. Int J Med Inform. 2021; 148:104399.

25. Kim HS, Kim JH. Proceed with caution when using real world data and real world evidence. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34:e28.

26. Kim HS, Kim DJ, Yoon KH. Medical big data is not yet available: why we need realism rather than exaggeration. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2019; 34:349–54.