3. Shim YK, Kim N, Park YH, et al. 2017; Effects of age on esophageal motility: use of high-resolution esophageal impedance manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 23:229–236. DOI:
10.5056/jnm16104. PMID:
28163259. PMCID:
PMC5383117.
Article
5. Suares NC, Ford AC. 2011; Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 106:1582–1592. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2011.164. PMID:
21606976.
Article
7. Gundling F, Seidl H, Scalercio N, Schmidt T, Schepp W, Pehl C. 2010; Influence of gender and age on anorectal function: normal values from anorectal manometry in a large caucasian population. Digestion. 81:207–213. DOI:
10.1159/000258662. PMID:
20110704.
Article
8. Lee HR, Lim SB, Park JY. 2014; Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function. Int J Colorectal Dis. 29:1393–1399. DOI:
10.1007/s00384-014-1961-4. PMID:
25092560.
Article
9. Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Harvey DM, Ravi K, Zinsmeister AR. 2012; Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol. 107:1530–1536. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2012.221. PMID:
22986439. PMCID:
PMC3968922.
Article
10. Oblizajek NR, Gandhi S, Sharma M, et al. 2019; Anorectal pressures measured with high-resolution manometry in healthy people-Normal values and asymptomatic pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 31:e13597. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13597. PMID:
30957382. PMCID:
PMC6559859.
Article
11. Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, et al. 2017; 3D high-definition anorectal manometry: values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 29:e13049. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13049. PMID:
28251732.
Article
12. Fox JC, Fletcher JG, Zinsmeister AR, Seide B, Riederer SJ, Bharucha AE. 2006; Effect of aging on anorectal and pelvic floor functions in females. Dis Colon Rectum. 49:1726–1735. DOI:
10.1007/s10350-006-0657-4. PMID:
17041752.
Article
13. Coss-Adame E, Rao SS, Valestin J, Ali-Azamar A, Remes-Troche JM. 2015; Accuracy and reproducibility of high-definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography analyses in healthy subjects. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13:1143–1150.e1. DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.034. PMID:
25616028. PMCID:
PMC4442034.
Article
14. Lee HJ, Jung KW, Han S, et al. 2014; Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:529–537. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12297. PMID:
24387705.
Article
15. Li Y, Yang X, Xu C, Zhang Y, Zhang X. 2013; Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects. Int J Colorectal Dis. 28:1161–1168. DOI:
10.1007/s00384-013-1706-9. PMID:
23657401.
Article
16. Carrington EV, Brokjaer A, Craven H, et al. 2014; Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:625–635. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12307. PMID:
24628873.
Article
17. Kang HR, Lee JE, Lee JS, et al. 2015; Comparison of high-resolution anorectal manometry with water-perfused anorectal manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 21:126–132. DOI:
10.5056/jnm14025. PMID:
25537672. PMCID:
PMC4288094.
Article
18. Rasijeff AMP, Withers M, Burke JM, Jackson W, Scott SM. 2017; High-resolution anorectal manometry: a comparison of solid-state and water-perfused catheters. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 29:e13124. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13124. PMID:
28639425.
Article
19. Gosling J, Plumb A, Taylor SA, Cohen R, Emmanuel AV. 2019; High-resolution anal manometry: repeatability, validation, and comparison with conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 31:e13591. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13591. PMID:
31094054.
Article