Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 Feb;25(1):62-70. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.62.

Chronological analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes after the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative supportive care, radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the only modality that can achieve long-term survival. We chronologically investigated surgical and oncological outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed the factors affecting overall survival.
Methods
We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with a curative intent. The patients were divided into groups based on the period when the surgery was performed: period I (2005-2011) and period II (2012-2018). The clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes were analyzed.
Results
The patients’ age, serum CA19-9 levels, and serum bilirubin levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in the period I group. There were no differences in pathological characteristics such as tumor stage, histopathologic status, and resection status. However, perioperative outcomes, such as estimated blood loss (1528.8 vs. 1034.1 mL, p=0.020) and postoperative severe complication rate (51.3% vs. 26.4%, p=0.022), were significantly lower in the period II group. Regression analysis demonstrated that period I (hazard ratio [HR]=1.591; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.049-2.414; p=0.029), preoperative serum bilirubin at diagnosis (HR=1.585; 95% CI=1.058-2.374; p=0.026), and tumor stage (III, IV) (HR=1.671; 95% CI: 1.133-2.464; p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate was better in the period II patients than in the period I patients (35.1% vs. 21.0%, p=0.0071).
Conclusions
The surgical and oncological outcomes were better in period II. Preoperative serum bilirubin and advanced tumor stage were associated with poor prognosis in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.`

Keyword

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin tumor; Chronological analysis; Surgical outcome; Oncological outcome; Survival

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Overall survival analysis according to period.


Reference

1. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, et al. 1999; Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 230:808–818. discussion 819DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00010. PMID: 10615936. PMCID: PMC1420945.
Article
2. Iwatsuki S, Todo S, Marsh JW, Madariaga JR, Lee RG, Dvorchik I, et al. 1998; Treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumors) with hepatic resection or transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 187:358–364. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00207-5. PMID: 9783781. PMCID: PMC2991118.
Article
3. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Kondo S, et al. 1998; Aggressive surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 5:52–61. DOI: 10.1007/PL00009951. PMID: 9683755.
Article
4. Mizuno T, Ebata T, Nagino M. 2020; Advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an aggressive surgical approach for the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative management, extended procedures, and multidisciplinary approaches. Surg Oncol. 33:201–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.07.002. PMID: 31301935.
Article
5. Kang MJ, Jang JY, Chang J, Shin YC, Lee D, Kim HB, et al. 2016; Actual long-term survival outcome of 403 consecutive patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 40:2451–2459. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3551-9. PMID: 27206402.
Article
6. Tran TB, Ethun CG, Pawlik TM, Schmidt C, Beal EW, Fields RC, et al. 2019; Actual 5-year survivors after surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 26:611–618. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7075-4. PMID: 30539494.
Article
7. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, von Wasielewski R, Werner M, Weimann A, Pichlmayr R. 1997; Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol. 15:947–954. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.947. PMID: 9060532.
Article
8. Su CH, Tsay SH, Wu CC, Shyr YM, King KL, Lee CH, et al. 1996; Factors influencing postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 223:384–394. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199604000-00007. PMID: 8633917. PMCID: PMC1235134.
Article
9. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Tso WK, Lam CM, Wong J. 2006; Improved operative and survival outcomes of surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 93:1488–1494. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5482. PMID: 17048280.
Article
10. Han SS, Jang JY, Lee KU, Kim SW. 2008; Actual long-term outcome of Klatskin's tumor after surgical resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 55:1986–1992. PMID: 19260464.
11. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. 1992; Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 215:31–38. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199201000-00005. PMID: 1309988. PMCID: PMC1242367.
Article
12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. 2009; The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 250:187–196. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PMID: 19638912.
13. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, et al. 2011; Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 149:713–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001. PMID: 21236455.
Article
14. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F, Giovannini I, Aldrighetti L, Belli G, et al. 2012; Improvement in perioperative and long-term outcome after surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 440 patients. Arch Surg. 147:26–34. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.771. PMID: 22250108.
15. Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Takahashi Y, et al. 2013; Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg. 258:129–140. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182708b57. PMID: 23059502.
16. Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, Ha TY, Moon DB, Jung DH, et al. 2010; Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 17:476–489. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5. PMID: 19851704.
Article
17. Furusawa N, Kobayashi A, Yokoyama T, Shimizu A, Motoyama H, Miyagawa S. 2014; Surgical treatment of 144 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma without liver-related mortality. World J Surg. 38:1164–1176. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2394-x. PMID: 24305942.
Article
18. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Nimura Y. 2005; One hundred consecutive hepatobiliary resections for biliary hilar malignancy: preoperative blood donation, blood loss, transfusion, and outcome. Surgery. 137:148–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.006. PMID: 15674194.
Article
19. Hwang HK, Jung MJ, Lee SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ. 2016; Adverse oncologic effects of intraoperative transfusion during pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: the need for strict transfusion policy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 23:497–507. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.368. PMID: 27295957.
Article
20. Kimura N, Toyoki Y, Ishido K, Kudo D, Yakoshi Y, Tsutsumi S, et al. 2015; Perioperative blood transfusion as a poor prognostic factor after aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 19:866–879. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2741-8. PMID: 25605416. PMCID: PMC4412428.
Article
21. Young AL, Igami T, Senda Y, Adair R, Farid S, Toogood GJ, et al. 2011; Evolution of the surgical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Western centre demonstrates improved survival with endoscopic biliary drainage and reduced use of blood transfusion. HPB (Oxford). 13:483–493. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00328.x. PMID: 21689232. PMCID: PMC3133715.
Article
22. Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ, Ahn YJ, Yoon YS, Choi MG, et al. 2005; Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 241:77–84. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150166.94732.88. PMID: 15621994. PMCID: PMC1356849.
Article
23. Capussotti L, Muratore A, Polastri R, Ferrero A, Massucco P. 2002; Liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: in-hospital mortality and longterm survival. J Am Coll Surg. 195:641–647. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01481-3. PMID: 12437251.
Article
24. Pichlmayr R, Weimann A, Klempnauer J, Oldhafer KJ, Maschek H, Tusch G, et al. 1996; Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer. A single-center experience. Ann Surg. 224:628–638. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00007. PMID: 8916878. PMCID: PMC1235440.
25. Todoroki T, Kawamoto T, Koike N, Takahashi H, Yoshida S, Kashiwagi H, et al. 2000; Radical resection of hilar bile duct carcinoma and predictors of survival. Br J Surg. 87:306–313. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01343.x. PMID: 10718799.
Article
26. Jung JH, Lee HJ, Lee HS, Jo JH, Cho IR, Chung MJ, et al. 2017; Benefit of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 23:3301–3308. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3301. PMID: 28566890. PMCID: PMC5434436.
Article
27. Sumiyoshi T, Shima Y, Okabayashi T, Negoro Y, Shimada Y, Iwata J, et al. 2018; Chemoradiotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 42:2910–2918. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4558-1. PMID: 29511872.
Article
28. Katayose Y, Nakagawa K, Yoshida H, Morikawa T, Hayashi H, Okada T, et al. 2015; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for cholangiocarcinoma to improve R0 resection rate: the first report of phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 33(3 Suppl):402. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.402.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr