J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2020;17:15. 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.15.

Patient as teacher sessions contextualize learning, enhancing knowledge, communication, and participation of pharmacy students in the United Kingdom

• Lunn AM
• Urmston A
• Seymour S
• Manfrin A

• KMID: 2504426
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.15

Abstract

Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Patient As Teacher (PAT) sessions on the knowledge, communication skills, and participation of pharmacy students in the United Kingdom.
Methods
During the academic year 2019–2020, year 1 and 2 pharmacy students at the University of Central Lancashire were invited to complete a questionnaire following PAT sessions. Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation for: continuous variables and reliability analysis. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher exact test, odds ratio, and phi were used for analyzing dichotomous variables. Thematic analysis was used for free text comments.
Results
Sixty eight of 228 students participated (response rate of 29.8%). No statistical difference was found between gender (P=0.090); a statistically significant difference was found between year (P=0.008). Cronbach’s α (0.809) confirmed a good internal consistency. Ninety-seven percent of the students learned a lot, and 85.3% appreciated and valued the PAT sessions; 89.7% wanted more sessions. Ninety-two point seven percent perceived the sessions to contextualize their learning. Five questions were dichotomized by grouping the responses into negative and positive; 90.3% of responses were positive and did not show statistically significant differences in gender and year of study. Overall students’ free text comments were positive, but active listening and consultation appeared in the positive and negative domains, highlighting the need for more student engagement.
Conclusion
PAT sessions had a positive impact on students’ knowledge, communication skills and participation, and contextualized learning. They provide a valuable contribution to the pharmacy students’ experience in the United Kingdom.

Keyword

Education; Pharmacy; Patients; Communication; Knowledge; United Kingdom

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Patient as teacher, student comments mind map.

Reference

References

1. Aires MJ, Gagnayre R, Gross O, Khau CA, Haghighi S, Mercier A, Ruelle Y, Marchand C. The patient teacher in general practice training: perspectives of residents. J Patient Exp. 2019; 6:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518803630.

2. Towle A, Brown H, Hofley C, Kerston RP, Lyons H, Walsh C. The expert patient as teacher: an interprofessional Health Mentors programme. Clin Teach. 2014; 11:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12222.

3. Cheng PT, Towle A. How patient educators help students to learn: an exploratory study. Med Teach. 2017; 39:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270426.

4. Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, Katz A, Kline C, Lown B, Madularu I, Solomon P, Thistlethwaite J. Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ. 2010; 44:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x.

5. General Pharmaceutical Council. Future pharmacists: standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists. London: General Pharmaceutical Council;2011.

6. Costello J, Horne M. Patients as teachers?: an evaluative study of patients’ involvement in classroom teaching. Nurse Educ Pract. 2001; 1:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1054/nepr.2001.0014.

7. Spencer J, Godolphin W, Karpenko N, Towle A. Can patients be teachers?: involving patients and service users in healthcare professional’s education. London: The Health Foundation;2011.

8. Hayes V, Bing-You R, Pitts D, Manning L. The benefits of honoring patients as teachers: a qualitative study. PRiMER. 2018; 2:4. https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2018.242345.

9. McKeown M, Malihi-Shoja L, Downe S. Service user and carer involvement in education for health and social care: promoting partnership for health. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons;2010.

10. Seymour S. Commensus: description of Commensus [Internet]. Preston: University of Central Lancashire;2019. [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.uclan.ac.uk/comen­sus/index.php.

11. Manfrin A, Wadiwala S, Apampa B. Students and faculty perception of Active Learning: a case study. Stud Engagem High Educ J. 2020; 3:213–230.

12. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.

13. Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.

14. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage;2013.

15. Smithson J, Bellingan M, Glass B, Mills J. Standardized patients in pharmacy education: an integrative literature review. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015; 7:851–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.002.