J Gastric Cancer.  2020 Mar;20(1):81-94. 10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e4.

Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China. chenpinghwamei@163.com
  • 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
  • 3Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • 4Department of Clinical Medicine, Monash University School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Duodenal stump leakage (DSL) is a potentially fatal complication that can occur after gastrectomy, but its underlying risk factors are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and management of DSL after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Relevant data were collected from several prospective databases to retrospectively analyze the data of GC patients who underwent Billroth II (B-II) or Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction after laparoscopic gastrectomy from 2 institutions (Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences). The DSL risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis regression.
RESULTS
A total of 810 patients were eligible for our analysis (426 with R-Y, 384 with B-II with Braun). Eleven patients had DSL (1.36%). Body mass index (BMI), elevated preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and unreinforced duodenal stump were the independent risk factors for DSL. DSL was diagnosed in 2-12 days, with a median of 8 days. Seven patients received conservative treatment, 3 patients received puncture treatment, and only 1 patient required reoperation. All patients recovered successfully after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The risk factors of DSL were BMI ≥24 kg/m², elevated preoperative CRP level, and unreinforced duodenal stump. Nonsurgical treatments for DSL are preferred.

Keyword

Risk factors; Duodenal stump leakage; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Gastric cancer

MeSH Terms

Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Body Mass Index
C-Reactive Protein
Gastrectomy*
Gastroenterostomy
Humans
Multivariate Analysis
Prospective Studies
Punctures
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors*
Stomach Neoplasms*
C-Reactive Protein

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the study population.B-II = Billroth II; R-Y = Roux-en-Y.


Reference

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:394–424. PMID: 30207593.
Article
2. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:453–462. PMID: 18669424.
Article
3. Lee CM, Park S, Park SH, Jung SW, Choe JW, Sul JY, et al. Sentinel node mapping using a fluorescent dye and visible light during laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a prospective study from a single institute. Ann Surg. 2017; 265:766–773. PMID: 27058946.
4. Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:3961–3969. PMID: 28342130.
Article
5. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321:1983–1992. PMID: 31135850.
6. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. 2019; 270:983–991. PMID: 30829698.
Article
7. Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Obama K, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A Study). Ann Surg. 2019; 269:887–894. PMID: 29697447.
8. Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, et al. What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:1539–1547. PMID: 22179454.
Article
9. Kawamura H, Ohno Y, Ichikawa N, Yoshida T, Homma S, Takahashi M, et al. Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler (OrVil) versus linear stapler (overlap method). Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:5175–5182. PMID: 28488177.
10. Aurello P, Sirimarco D, Magistri P, Petrucciani N, Berardi G, Amato S, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21:7571–7576. PMID: 26140005.
Article
11. Cozzaglio L, Giovenzana M, Biffi R, Cobianchi L, Coniglio A, Framarini M, et al. Surgical management of duodenal stump fistula after elective gastrectomy for malignancy: an Italian retrospective multicenter study. Gastric Cancer. 2016; 19:273–279. PMID: 25491774.
Article
12. Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kojima K. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32:735–742. PMID: 28726137.
Article
13. Kim CH, Song KY, Park CH, Seo YJ, Park SM, Kim JJ. A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2015; 15:46–52. PMID: 25861522.
Article
14. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:113–123. PMID: 21573742.
15. Ri M, Hiki N, Ishizuka N, Ida S, Kumagai K, Nunobe S, et al. Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019; 22:1053–1059. PMID: 30852781.
Article
16. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017; 20:1–19.
17. Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Clinical outcomes and quality of life according to types of reconstruction following laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015; 25:69–73. PMID: 24743669.
Article
18. Okuno K, Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Kanemoto E, Gokita K, Tanioka T, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32:4465–4471. PMID: 29654529.
Article
19. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11:439–449. PMID: 20409751.
Article
20. Ali BI, Park CH, Song KY. Outcomes of non-operative treatment for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2016; 16:28–33. PMID: 27104024.
Article
21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:205–213. PMID: 15273542.
22. Cozzaglio L, Cimino M, Mauri G, Ardito A, Pedicini V, Poretti D, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and occlusion balloon in the management of duodenal stump fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15:1977–1981. PMID: 21913043.
Article
23. Kang KC, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim W, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al. Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:1953–1961. PMID: 21136095.
Article
24. Paik HJ, Lee SH, Choi CI, Kim DH, Jeon TY, Kim DH, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: risk factors, prevention, and management. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016; 90:157–163. PMID: 26942159.
Article
25. Orsenigo E, Bissolati M, Socci C, Chiari D, Muffatti F, Nifosi J, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 17:733–744. PMID: 24399492.
Article
26. Ramos MF, Pereira MA, Barchi LC, Yagi OK, Dias AR, Szor DJ, et al. Duodenal fistula: the most lethal surgical complication in a case series of radical gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2018; 53:366–370. PMID: 29653246.
Article
27. Takeuchi M, Ishii K, Seki H, Yasui N, Sakata M, Shimada A, et al. Excessive visceral fat area as a risk factor for early postoperative complications of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2016; 16:54. PMID: 27494994.
Article
28. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015; 102:462–479. PMID: 25703524.
Article
29. Lopez-Pastorini A, Riedel R, Koryllos A, Beckers F, Ludwig C, Stoelben E. The impact of preoperative elevated serum C-reactive protein on postoperative morbidity and mortality after anatomic resection for lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017; 109:68–73. PMID: 28577953.
Article
30. Mansukhani V, Desai G, Shah R, Jagannath P. The role of preoperative C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy infective complications: a prospective observational study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017; 36:289–295. PMID: 28752361.
Article
31. Perry TE, Muehlschlegel JD, Liu KY, Fox AA, Collard CD, Body SC, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts long-term mortality and hospital length of stay after primary, nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112:607–613. PMID: 20179497.
Article
32. Egenvall M, Mörner M, Martling A, Gunnarsson U. Prediction of outcome after curative surgery for colorectal cancer: preoperative haemoglobin, C-reactive protein and albumin. Colorectal Dis. 2018; 20:26–34. PMID: 28685921.
Article
33. Kim EY, Yim HW, Park CH, Song KY. C-reactive protein can be an early predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:445–454. PMID: 27734201.
Article
34. Crumley AB, McMillan DC, McKernan M, Going JJ, Shearer CJ, Stuart RC. An elevated C-reactive protein concentration, prior to surgery, predicts poor cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:1568–1571. PMID: 16685271.
Article
35. Johnson TV, Abbasi A, Owen-Smith A, Young A, Ogan K, Pattaras J, et al. Absolute preoperative C-reactive protein predicts metastasis and mortality in the first year following potentially curative nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010; 183:480–485. PMID: 20006861.
Article
36. Xu BB, Lu J, Zheng ZF, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. The predictive value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin ratio for early recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: using randomized phase III trial data. Gastric Cancer. 2019; 22:1016–1028. PMID: 30739259.
Article
37. Kim MC, Kim SY, Kim KW. Laparoscopic reinforcement suture (LARS) on staple line of duodenal stump using barbed suture in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective single arm phase II study. J Gastric Cancer. 2017; 17:354–362. PMID: 29302375.
Article
38. Misawa K, Yoshikawa T, Ito S, Cho H, Ito Y, Ogata T. Safety and feasibility of linear stapling device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid sheet for duodenal closure in gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional phase II study. World J Surg. 2019; 43:192–198. PMID: 30105634.
Article
39. Zizzo M, Ugoletti L, Manzini L, Castro Ruiz C, Nita GE, Zanelli M, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for malignant disease: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2019; 19:55. PMID: 31138190.
Article
40. Cornejo ML, Priego P, Ramos D, Coll M, Ballestero A, Galindo J, et al. Duodenal fistula after gastrectomy: retrospective study of 13 new cases. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016; 108:20–26. PMID: 26765231.
Article
41. Lee JY, Ryu KW, Cho SJ, Kim CG, Choi IJ, Kim MJ, et al. Endoscopic clipping of duodenal stump leakage after Billroth II gastrectomy in gastric cancer patient. J Surg Oncol. 2009; 100:80–81. PMID: 19373865.
Article
42. Schots JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Abdominal drainage and amylase measurement for detection of leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22:1163–1170. PMID: 29736661.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JGC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr