Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  2019 ;41(1):52. 10.1186/s40902-019-0231-3.

Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment

• Bakri MM
• Lee SH
• Lee JH

• KMID: 2468999
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0231-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND
A compact passive oxide layer can grow on tantalum (Ta). It has been reported that this oxide layer can facilitate bone ingrowth in vivo though the development of bone-like apatite, which promotes hard and soft tissue adhesion. Thus, Ta surface treatment on facial implant materials may improve the tissue response, which could result in less fibrotic encapsulation and make the implant more stable on the bone surface. The purposes of this study were to verify whether surface treatment of facial implant materials using Ta can improve the biohistobiological response and to determine the possibility of potential clinical applications.
METHODS
Two different and commonly used implant materials, silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), were treated via Ta ion implantation using a Ta sputtering gun. Ta-treated samples were compared with untreated samples using in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Osteoblast (MG-63) and fibroblast (NIH3T3) cell viability with the Ta-treated implant material was assessed, and the tissue response was observed by placing the implants over the rat calvarium (n"‰="‰48) for two different lengths of time. Foreign body and inflammatory reactions were observed, and soft tissue thickness between the calvarium and the implant as well as the bone response was measured.
RESULTS
The treatment of facial implant materials using Ta showed a tendency toward increased fibroblast and osteoblast viability, although this result was not statistically significant. During the in vivo study, both Ta-treated and untreated implants showed similar foreign body reactions. However, the Ta-treated implant materials (silicone and ePTFE) showed a tendency toward better histological features: lower soft tissue thickness between the implant and the underlying calvarium as well as an increase in new bone activity.
CONCLUSION
Ta surface treatment using ion implantation on silicone and ePTFE facial implant materials showed the possibility of reducing soft tissue intervention between the calvarium and the implant to make the implant more stable on the bone surface. Although no statistically significant improvement was observed, Ta treatment revealed a tendency toward an improved biohistological response of silicone and ePTFE facial implants. Conclusively, tantalum treatment is beneficial and has the potential for clinical applications.

Keyword

Tantalum ion implantation; Surface treatment; ePTFE; Silicone

MeSH Terms

Animals
Cell Survival
Fibroblasts
Foreign Bodies
In Vitro Techniques
Osteoblasts
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Rats
Silicon
Silicones
Skull
Tantalum*
Tissue Adhesions
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Silicon
Silicones
Tantalum