Korean J Radiol.  2019 Nov;20(11):1536-1545. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0104.

Altered Functional Brain Networks in Patients with Traumatic Anosmia: Resting-State Functional MRI Based on Graph Theoretical Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. mdmoonwj@naver.com
  • 2Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroImaging, Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, and KI for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea. yong@kaist.ac.kr
  • 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Traumatic anosmia is a common disorder following head injury; however, little is known regarding its neural basis and influence on the functional networks. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the functional connectivity changes in patients with traumatic anosmia compared to healthy controls using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixteen patients with traumatic anosmia and 12 healthy controls underwent rs-fMRI. Differences in the connectivity of the olfactory and whole brain networks were compared between the two groups. Graph theoretical parameters, such as modularity and global efficiency of the whole brain or olfactory networks, were calculated and compared. Correlation analyses were performed between the parameters and disease severity.
RESULTS
Patients with traumatic anosmia showed decreased intra-network connectivity in the olfactory network (false discovery rate [FDR]-corrected p < 0.05) compared with that in healthy controls. Furthermore, the inter-network connectivity was increased in both the olfactory (FDR-corrected p < 0.05) and whole brain networks (degree-based statistic-corrected p < 0.05) in the anosmia group. The whole brain networks showed decreased modularity (p < 0.001) and increased global efficiency (p = 0.019) in patients with traumatic anosmia. The modularity and global efficiency were correlated with disease severity in patients with anosmia (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Traumatic anosmia increased the inter-network connectivity observed with rs-fMRI in the olfactory and global brain functional networks. rs-fMRI parameters may serve as potential biomarkers for traumatic anosmia by revealing a more widespread functional damage than previously expected.

Keyword

Traumatic anosmia; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Resting state; Brain networks; Functional connectivity; Graph theory

MeSH Terms

Biomarkers
Brain*
Craniocerebral Trauma
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Olfaction Disorders*
Biomarkers

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Functional connectivity of olfactory network and functional connectivity differences between healthy controls and patients with traumatic anosmia.Numbers in left column and bottom row indicate anatomical ROI numbers, and information about each ROI number is provided in Supplementary Table 1.A. Significant difference in functional connectivity between groups. White color indicates significantly lower functional connectivity and black color indicates significantly higher functional connectivity in patients. Intra-cluster connectivity was decreased in patients, specifically in insular cortex (ROI numbers 4, 5, 8, and 10) and anterior cingulate/frontal cortex (ROI numbers 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 21). Inter-anatomical-cluster connectivity was increased in patients (ROI numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 15, 18, and 19). B. Glass-brain representation of functional connectivity differences. Both higher and lower functional connectivity were observed in patients with anosmia compared to that in healthy controls. FDR = false discovery rate, ROI = region-of-interest

  • Fig. 2 Whole brain functional connectivity and differences between healthy controls and patients with traumatic anosmia.A. Functional connectivity differences are shown as t-statistic matrix, where positive values indicate lower connectivity in patients and vice versa. B. Functional connectivity with significant difference between groups through cluster-wise inference methods. White color indicates significantly lower functional connectivity and black color indicates significantly higher functional connectivity in patients with anosmia with corresponding anatomic locations appearing on color blocks and each color indicating different anatomic functional location from one shown in left column. Functional connectivity was generally higher in significant clusters for patients. DBS = degree-based-statistic

  • Fig. 3 Glass brain representations of functional connectivity differences.Nodes are highlighted with various colors according to their assigned networks. Edges in blue indicate lower connectivity, while red indicates higher connectivity in patients. Top 5 clusters are presented separately in bottom figure. Cluster presented on left was more significant. Additional information on clusters is provided in Table 1. Major clusters had significant functional connectivity differences between visual, sensory/somatomotor hand, and subcortical networks.

  • Fig. 4 Predicting KVSS II score using network parameters for patients with traumatic anosmia.Three-dimensional scatter plots show linear relationships between KVSS II score, network parameters, and disease duration. Network parameters predicted KVSS II scores when controlling for disease duration. R-squared and p values of whole regression model, and p value for each parameter are presented. Global efficiency and modularity showed significant and opposite linear relationships with KVSS II score. KVSS = Korean Virsion of Sniffin stick


Reference

1. Costanzo RM, Miwa T. Posttraumatic olfactory loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 63:99–107. PMID: 16733335.
Article
2. Mott AE, Leopold DA. Disorders in taste and smell. Med Clin North Am. 1991; 75:1321–1353. PMID: 1943323.
Article
3. Schofield PW, Moore TM, Gardner A. Traumatic brain injury and olfaction: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2014; 5:5. PMID: 24478752.
Article
4. Miao X, Yang L, Gu H, Ren Y, Chen G, Liu J, et al. Evaluation of post-traumatic anosmia with MRI and chemosensory ERPs. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272:1945–1953. PMID: 25253545.
Article
5. Yousem DM, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, McKeown DA, Doty RL. Posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction: MR and clinical evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996; 17:1171–1179. PMID: 8791933.
6. Henkin RI, Levy LM. Functional MRI of congenital hyposmia: brain activation to odors and imagination of odors and tastes. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002; 26:39–61. PMID: 11801904.
Article
7. Kollndorfer K, Fischmeister FP, Kowalczyk K, Hoche E, Mueller CA, Trattnig S, et al. Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss. Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 9:401–410. PMID: 26594622.
Article
8. Moon WJ, Park M, Hwang M, Kim JK. Functional MRI as an objective measure of olfaction deficit in patients with traumatic anosmia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39:2320–2325. PMID: 30409849.
Article
9. Reichert JL, Postma EM, Smeets PAM, Boek WM, de Graaf K, Schöpf V, et al. Severity of olfactory deficits is reflected in functional brain networks-An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39:3166–3177. PMID: 29602198.
Article
10. Hummel T, Fliessbach K, Abele M, Okulla T, Reden J, Reichmann H, et al. Olfactory FMRI in patients with Parkinson's disease. Front Integr Neurosci. 2010; 4:125. PMID: 21120143.
Article
11. Schneider F, Habel U, Reske M, Toni I, Falkai P, Shah NJ. Neural substrates of olfactory processing in schizophrenia patients and their healthy relatives. Psychiatry Res. 2007; 155:103–112. PMID: 17532193.
Article
12. Wang J, Eslinger PJ, Doty RL, Zimmerman EK, Grunfeld R, Sun X, et al. Olfactory deficit detected by fMRI in early Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 2010; 1357:184–194. PMID: 20709038.
Article
13. Vedaei F, Fakhri M, Harirchian MH, Firouznia K, Lotfi Y, Ali Oghabian M. Methodological considerations in conducting an olfactory fMRI study. Behav Neurol. 2013; 27:267–276. PMID: 23619085.
Article
14. Hohenfeld C, Werner CJ, Reetz K. Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: is there potential for an imaging biomarker? Neuroimage Clin. 2018; 18:849–870. PMID: 29876270.
Article
15. Kollndorfer K, Jakab A, Mueller CA, Trattnig S, Schöpf V. Effects of chronic peripheral olfactory loss on functional brain networks. Neuroscience. 2015; 310:589–599. PMID: 26415766.
Article
16. Hong SC, Yoo YS, Kim ES, Kim SC, Park SH, Kim JK, et al. Development of KVSS test (Korean version of Sniffin' Sticks test). Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1999; 42:855–860.
17. Cho JH, Jeong YS, Lee YJ, Hong SC, Yoon JH, Kim JK. The Korean version of the Sniffin' stick (KVSS) test and its validity in comparison with the cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009; 36:280–286. PMID: 18775610.
Article
18. Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Trujillo-Barreto N, et al. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage. 2008; 39:1104–1120. PMID: 17997111.
Article
19. Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G. Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. In : Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paola R, editors. Information processing in medical imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;1995. p. 263–274.
20. Rao H, Korczykowski M, Pluta J, Hoang A, Detre JA. Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: an fMRI study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). Neuroimage. 2008; 42:902–910. PMID: 18582578.
Article
21. Shah C, Erhard K, Ortheil HJ, Kaza E, Kessler C, Lotze M. Neural correlates of creative writing: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013; 34:1088–1101. PMID: 22162145.
Article
22. Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Barnes KA, Church JA, et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron. 2011; 72:665–678. PMID: 22099467.
Article
23. Seubert J, Freiherr J, Djordjevic J, Lundström JN. Statistical localization of human olfactory cortex. Neuroimage. 2013; 66:333–342. PMID: 23103688.
Article
24. Pamplona GS, Santos Neto GS, Rosset SR, Rogers BP, Salmon CE. Analyzing the association between functional connectivity of the brain and intellectual performance. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:61. PMID: 25713528.
Article
25. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010; 52:1059–1069. PMID: 19819337.
Article
26. Latora V, Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2001; 87:198701. PMID: 11690461.
Article
27. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech. 2008; 2008:P10008.
Article
28. Chung J, Yoo K, Lee P, Kim CM, Roh JH, Park JE, et al. Normalization of cortical thickness measurements across different T1 magnetic resonance imaging protocols by novel W-score standardization. Neuroimage. 2017; 159:224–235. PMID: 28757193.
Article
29. Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M. Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology. 2011; 48:1711–1725. PMID: 21895683.
Article
30. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995; 57:289–300.
Article
31. Yoo K, Lee P, Chung MK, Sohn WS, Chung SJ, Na DL, et al. Degree-based statistic and center persistency for brain connectivity analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38:165–181. PMID: 27593391.
Article
32. Han P, Winkler N, Hummel C, Hähner A, Gerber J, Hummel T. Alterations of brain gray matter density and olfactory bulb volume in patients with olfactory loss after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018; 35:2632–2640. PMID: 29699465.
Article
33. Damoiseaux JS, Prater KE, Miller BL, Greicius MD. Functional connectivity tracks clinical deterioration in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2012; 33:828.e19–828.e30.
Article
34. Bettus G, Guedj E, Joyeux F, Confort-Gouny S, Soulier E, Laguitton V, et al. Decreased basal fMRI functional connectivity in epileptogenic networks and contralateral compensatory mechanisms. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009; 30:1580–1591. PMID: 18661506.
Article
35. Kollndorfer K, Kowalczyk K, Hoche E, Mueller CA, Pollak M, Trattnig S, et al. Recovery of olfactory function induces neuroplasticity effects in patients with smell loss. Neural Plast. 2014; 2014:140419. PMID: 25544900.
Article
36. Bende M, Nordin S. Perceptual learning in olfaction: professional wine tasters versus controls. Physiol Behav. 1997; 62:1065–1070. PMID: 9333201.
37. van den Heuvel MP, Hulshoff Pol HE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010; 20:519–534. PMID: 20471808.
Article
38. Stanley ML, Simpson SL, Dagenbach D, Lyday RG, Burdette JH, Laurienti PJ. Changes in brain network efficiency and working memory performance in aging. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0123950. PMID: 25875001.
Article
39. Meunier D, Achard S, Morcom A, Bullmore E. Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks. Neuroimage. 2009; 44:715–723. PMID: 19027073.
Article
40. Song J, Birn RM, Boly M, Meier TB, Nair VA, Meyerand ME, et al. Age-related reorganizational changes in modularity and functional connectivity of human brain networks. Brain Connect. 2014; 4:662–676. PMID: 25183440.
Article
41. Alexander-Bloch AF, Gogtay N, Meunier D, Birn R, Clasen L, Lalonde F, et al. Disrupted modularity and local connectivity of brain functional networks in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010; 4:147. PMID: 21031030.
Article
42. Brier MR, Thomas JB, Fagan AM, Hassenstab J, Holtzman DM, Benzinger TL, et al. Functional connectivity and graph theory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014; 35:757–768. PMID: 24216223.
Article
43. Baum GL, Ciric R, Roalf DR, Betzel RF, Moore TM, Shinohara RT, et al. Modular segregation of structural brain networks supports the development of executive function in youth. Curr Biol. 2017; 27:1561–1572.e8. PMID: 28552358.
Article
44. Sporns O. The non-random brain: efficiency, economy, and complex dynamics. Front Comput Neurosci. 2011; 5:5. PMID: 21369354.
Article
45. Nakayama N, Okumura A, Shinoda J, Yasokawa YT, Miwa K, Yoshimura SI, et al. Evidence for white matter disruption in traumatic brain injury without macroscopic lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77:850–855. PMID: 16574734.
Article
46. Eierud C, Craddock RC, Fletcher S, Aulakh M, King-Casas B, Kuehl D, et al. Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 4:283–294. PMID: 25061565.
Article
47. Akiki TJ, Averill CL, Wrocklage KM, Scott JC, Averill LA, Schweinsburg B, et al. Default mode network abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: a novel network-restricted topology approach. Neuroimage. 2018; 176:489–498. PMID: 29730491.
Article
48. Zhou Y. Small world properties changes in mild traumatic brain injury. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 46:518–527. PMID: 27902865.
Article
49. Kaushal M, España LY, Nencka AS, Wang Y, Nelson LD, McCrea MA, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity after concussion is associated with clinical recovery. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 40:1211–1220. PMID: 30451340.
Article
50. Vakhtin AA, Calhoun VD, Jung RE, Prestopnik JL, Taylor PA, Ford CC. Changes in intrinsic functional brain networks following blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013; 27:1304–1310. PMID: 24020442.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr