Blood Res.  2019 Sep;54(3):218-228. 10.5045/br.2019.54.3.218.

Prognostic utility of ADAMTS13 activity for the atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and comparison of complement serology between aHUS and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea. doh@cha.ac.kr
  • 2Institute for Clinical Research, School of Medicine CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 3Department Laboratory Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 4Western Australian Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) involves dysregulation of the complement system, but whether this also occurs in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) remains unclear. Although these conditions are difficult to differentiate clinically, TTP can be distinguished by low (<10%) ADAMTS13 activity. The aim was to identify the differences in complement activation products between TTP and aHUS and investigate ADAMTS13 activity as a prognostic factor in aHUS.
METHODS
We analyzed patients with thrombotic microangiopathy diagnosed as TTP (N=48) or aHUS (N=50), selected from a Korean registry (N=551). Complement activation products in the plasma samples collected from the patients prior to treatment and in 40 healthy controls were measured by ELISA.
RESULTS
The levels of generalized (C3a), alternate (factor Bb), and terminal (C5a and C5b-9) markers were significantly higher (all P<0.01) in the patients than in the healthy controls. Only the factor Bb levels significantly differed (P=0.008) between the two disease groups. In aHUS patients, high normal ADAMTS13 activity (≥77%) was associated with improved treatment response (OR, 6.769; 95% CI, 1.605-28.542; P=0.005), remission (OR, 6.000; 95% CI, 1.693-21.262; P=0.004), exacerbation (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.064-0.916; P=0.031), and disease-associated mortality rates (OR, 0.155; 95% CI, 0.029-0.813; P=0.017).
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that complement biomarkers, except factor Bb, are similarly activated in TTP and aHUS patients, and ADAMTS13 activity can predict the treatment response and outcome in aHUS patients.

Keyword

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; Complement; High ADAMTS13 activity; Treatment outcomes

MeSH Terms

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome*
Biomarkers
Complement Activation
Complement System Proteins*
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Humans
Mortality
Plasma
Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic*
Thrombotic Microangiopathies
Biomarkers
Complement System Proteins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 CONSORT diagram of the patients included in analysis. Abbreviations: ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; aHUS, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; PEX, plasma exchange; STEC-HUS, Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli hemolytic uremic syndrome; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

  • Fig. 2 Summary box plots for the levels of complement activation products in healthy controls (N=40) and in patients with TTP (N=48), aHUS (N=41), or GC-aHUS (N=9) measured with ELISA. (A) C3a [ng/mL: control, 139.8 (31–473.8); TTP, 195.9 (62–404.4); aHUS, 221.3 (80.7–791.8); GC-aHUS, 266.4 (115.7–483.8); P=0.005]. (B) Factor Bb [ng/mL: control, 499 (110–2,072); TTP, 760 (1–16,557); aHUS, 1,200 (270–11,797); GC-aHUS, 1,380 (52–2490); P<0.001]. (C) C5a [ng/mL: control, 11.4 (2.7–69.1); TTP, 20.1 (2.7–68.6); aHUS, 19.9 (5.4–66.1); GC-aHUS, 22.7 (8.7 –37.4); P=0.001]. (D) C5b-9 [ng/mL: control, 155 (58–459); TTP, 292 (85–939); aHUS, 317 (82–1,415); GC-aHUS, 340 (183–515); P<0.001]. All the data represent the medians (ranges). The P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Abbreviations: aHUS, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; GC-aHUS, genetically confirmed aHUS; NS, not significant; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.


Reference

1. George JN, Nester CM. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:1847–1848.
Article
2. Mannucci PM, Cugno M. The complex differential diagnosis between thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and the atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: laboratory weapons and their impact on treatment choice and monitoring. Thromb Res. 2015; 136:851–854.
Article
3. Crawley JT, Scully MA. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: basic pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013; 2013:292–299.
Article
4. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1676–1687.
Article
5. Loirat C, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011; 6:60.
Article
6. Afshar-Kharghan V. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016; 2016:217–225.
Article
7. Ruiz-Torres MP, Casiraghi F, Galbusera M, et al. Complement activation: the missing link between ADAMTS-13 deficiency and microvascular thrombosis of thrombotic microangiopathies. Thromb Haemost. 2005; 93:443–452.
Article
8. Jang MJ, Chong SY, Kim IH, et al. Clinical features of severe acquired ADAMTS13 deficiency in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: the Korean TTP registry experience. Int J Hematol. 2011; 93:163–169.
Article
9. Cataland SR, Holers VM, Geyer S, Yang S, Wu HM. Biomarkers of terminal complement activation confirm the diagnosis of aHUS and differentiate aHUS from TTP. Blood. 2014; 123:3733–3738.
Article
10. Coppo P, Schwarzinger M, Buffet M, et al. Predictive features of severe acquired ADAMTS13 deficiency in idiopathic thrombotic microangiopathies: the French TMA reference center experience. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e10208.
Article
11. Vesely SK, George JN, Lammle B, et al. ADAMTS13 activity in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome: relation to presenting features and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of 142 patients. Blood. 2003; 102:60–68.
Article
12. Ricklin D, Hajishengallis G, Yang K, Lambris JD. Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2010; 11:785–797.
Article
13. Noris M, Mescia F, Remuzzi G. STEC-HUS, atypical HUS and TTP are all diseases of complement activation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012; 8:622–633.
Article
14. Kavanagh D, Goodship TH. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, genetic basis, and clinical manifestations. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011; 2011:15–20.
Article
15. Legendre CM, Licht C, Muus P, et al. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:2169–2181.
Article
16. Kremer Hovinga JA, Vesely SK, Terrell DR, Lammle B, George JN. Survival and relapse in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2010; 115:1500–1511.
Article
17. Reti M, Farkas P, Csuka D, et al. Complement activation in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10:791–798.
Article
18. Westwood JP, Langley K, Heelas E, Machin SJ, Scully M. Complement and cytokine response in acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2014; 164:858–866.
Article
19. Wu TC, Yang S, Haven S, et al. Complement activation and mortality during an acute episode of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2013; 11:1925–1927.
Article
20. Feng S, Liang X, Kroll MH, Chung DW, Afshar-Kharghan V. von Willebrand factor is a cofactor in complement regulation. Blood. 2015; 125:1034–1037.
Article
21. Turner NA, Moake J. Assembly and activation of alternative complement components on endothelial cell-anchored ultra-large von Willebrand factor links complement and hemostasisthrombosis. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e59372.
Article
22. Thurman JM, Marians R, Emlen W, et al. Alternative pathway of complement in children with diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4:1920–1924.
Article
23. Martin K, Borgel D, Lerolle N, et al. Decreased ADAMTS-13 (A disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats) is associated with a poor prognosis in sepsis-induced organ failure. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35:2375–2382.
Article
24. Farkas P, Csuka D, Mikes B, et al. Complement activation, inflammation and relative ADAMTS13 deficiency in secondary thrombotic microangiopathies. Immunobiology. 2017; 222:119–127.
Article
25. Khanal N, Dahal S, Upadhyay S, Bhatt VR, Bierman PJ. Differentiating malignant hypertension-induced thrombotic microangiopathy from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Ther Adv Hematol. 2015; 6:97–102.
Article
26. Bendapudi PK, Hurwitz S, Fry A, et al. Derivation and external validation of the PLASMIC score for rapid assessment of adults with thrombotic microangiopathies: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2017; 4:e157–e164.
Article
27. Lee JM, Park YS, Lee JH, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Korean pediatric series. Pediatr Int. 2015; 57:431–438.
Article
Full Text Links
  • BR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr