Yonsei Med J.  2012 Sep;53(5):1028-1035.

Development of the Rectus Abdominis and Its Sheath in the Human Fetus

• Yang JD
• Hwang HP
• Kim JH
• Rodriguez-Vazquez JF
• Abe SI
• Murakami G
• Cho BH

Abstract

PURPOSE
Although the rectus abdominis and its sheath are well known structures, their development in the human fetus is poorly understood.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We examined rectus abdominis and sheath development in semiserial horizontal sections of 18 fetuses at 5-9 weeks of gestation.
RESULTS
Rectus muscle differentiation was found to commence above the umbilicus at 6 weeks and extend inferiorly. Until closure of the anterior chest wall via fusion of the bilateral sternal anlagen (at 7 weeks), the anterior rectal sheath originated from the external oblique and developed towards the medial margin of the rectus abdominis at all levels, including the supracostal part. After formation of the anterior sheath, fascial laminae from the internal oblique and transversus abdominis contributed to formation of the posterior rectus sheath. However, the posterior sheath was absent along the supracostal part of the rectus abdominis, as the transversus muscle fibers reached the sternum or the midline area. Therefore, it appeared that resolution of the physiological umbilical hernia (8-9 weeks) as well as chest wall closure was not required for development of the rectus abdominis and its sheath. Conversely, in the inferior part of the two largest fetal specimens, after resolution of the hernia, the posterior sheath underwent secondary disappearance, possibly due to changes in mechanical stress.
CONCLUSION
Upward extension of the rectus abdominis suddenly stopped at the margin of the inferiorly developing pectoralis major without facing the external intercostalis. The rectus thoracis, if present, might correspond to the pectoralis.

Keyword

Rectus abdominis; rectus sheath; pectoralis; sternalis; sternum; rib

MeSH Terms

Fetus*
Hernia
Hernia, Umbilical
Humans*
Pregnancy
Rectus Abdominis*
Ribs
Sternum
Stress, Mechanical
Thoracic Wall
Umbilicus

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 The abdominal wall is occupied by the umbilical veins in tilted horizontal sections of a 5-week embryo (CRL 7 mm). HE staining. Panel A (or Panel D) is the most superior (or inferior) in the figure. Panels E-H are higher magnification views of the primitive rectus abdominis shown in panels A-D, respectively. Panel C displays the level of the umbilical hernia. Arrows in panels B-D (or E and F) indicate developing ribs (or candidate anlagen of the abdominal wall muscles). The plate-like, midline condensation (arrows in panel F) appears to correspond to the abdominal band in mice and rats (see text for explanation). Panels A-D or panels E-H were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panels D and H).

• 

  Fig. 2 Abdominal wall muscles appear in horizontal sections of a 6-week embryo (CRL 16 mm). HE staining (panels A-C) and silver impregnation (panels D-F). Panel A (or Panel F) is the most superior (or inferior) level of the figure. The rectus abdominis (R) appears to be differentiated at levels above the umbilicus (panels A and B), but it is identified as a mesenchymal cell cluster alongside the umbilicus (panels C and D) and is difficult to identify below the umbilicus (star in panels E and F). Likewise, the oblique muscles (EO, IO) are not identified below the umbilicus (panels E and F). The rectus abdominis is located in the lateral part of the body wall rather than the anterior site. The rectus sheath (arrowheads) was not seen at any level. The diaphragm has not yet developed. The future inferior part of the pleural cavity is filled with loose tissue (PC in panels A-C). All panels were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panel B). In all figures including Fig. 1, the upper side of each panel corresponds to the anterior or ventral side of the body. AO, aorta; SA, serratus anterior; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; UA, umbilical artery; UR, urachus; EO, external oblique; IO, internal oblique; PC, primitive pleural cavity.

• 

  Fig. 3 Anterior rectal sheath appears in horizontal sections of a 7-week embryo (CRL 21 mm). HE staining. Panel A (or Panel G) is the most superior (or inferior) level of the figure. The rectus abdominis extends superiorly in the superficial side of the rib cage (panels A-D). However, the anterior chest wall is not closed by the sternum but by the surface ectoderm and underlining mesenchymal tissues (stars in panel B). Panels C and D are higher magnification views of the bilateral rectus muscles shown in panel B. The PC is filled with loose mesenchymal tissue (panels B and C). Panel E, the level of the umbilical vein exiting the liver, with the ribs also present. The anterior sheath (arrowheads), originating from the external oblique (EO), covers the rectus abdominis at levels above the umbilicus (panels B-E). In panel F (the level of the umbilical hernia) and panel G (a level below the umbilicus), the rectus sheath as well as the transversus (T) is difficult to identify. In panel G, the rectus abdominis is artifactually divided into two parts during the histological procedure. The rectus abdominis is reduced in size at the level below the umbilicus (panel G). An insert of panel G demonstrates the most inferior part of the muscle comprising of a single small band adjacent to the pubic bone anlage (pubis). Panels A and C-G were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panel A). D, diaphragm; IEA, inferior epigastric artery; IO, internal oblique; PC, primitive pleural cavity; T, transverses abdominis/thoracis; UA, umbilical artery; UR, urachus.

• 

  Fig. 4 Posterior rectus sheath appears in horizontal sections of an 8-week embryo (CRL 29 mm). HE staining. Panel A (or Panel F) is the most superior (or inferior) level of the figure. In panels A-C, the rectus abdominis (R) attaches to the anterior aspect of the ribs, but it does not extend medially to reach the sternum (S). The rectus abdominis is located at the superficial side of the internal intercostal (II). The asterisk in panel A indicates bleeding. The anterior sheath (arrowheads), originating from the external oblique (EO), covers the rectus abdominis at all levels (panels A-F). In panel D, the level of the umbilical vein exiting the liver, note the absence of ribs. In panel E (a level of the umbilical hernia) and panel F (a level below the umbilicus), the posterior sheath (arrows) originates from the transversus abdominis (T). In panel F, the midline area is composed of loose mesenchymal tissue (asterisk) and the anterior sheath (arrowheads) does not reach the midline area. All panels were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panel A). D, diaphragm; IEA, inferior epigastric artery; IO, internal oblique; T, transverses abdominis/thoracis; UA, umbilical artery; UR, urachus.

• 

  Fig. 5 Posterior rectus sheath becomes clear in horizontal sections of a 9-week fetus (CRL 35 mm). HE staining. Panel A (or Panel F) is the most superior (or inferior) level of the figure. The bilateral sternal anlagen have already fused (panels A and B). The supracostal part of the rectus abdominis (R) is located on the superficial side of (panel A), but in panels B and C, at the same layer as the internal intercostal (II). The anterior sheath (arrowheads), originating from the external oblique (EO), covers the rectus abdominis at all levels (panels A-F). In panel D, the level of the umbilical vein exiting the liver, the ribs are seen. A midline raphe-like structure can be seen (asterisk in panel D). Panel E, a level of the umbilical hernia, which includes the 11th rib that receives the internal oblique (IO). In panel F, a level below the umbilicus, three lateral muscles are separated by relatively wide loose mesenchymal tissues. Arrows in panels E and F indicate the posterior sheath originating from the transversus abdominis (T). All panels were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panel A). SMA, superior mesenteric artery. D, diaphragm; IEA, inferior epigastric artery; S, sternum.

• 

  Fig. 6 Secondary change of the posterior rectus sheath after resolution of the umbilical hernia: horizontal sections of a 9-week fetus (CRL 36 mm). HE staining. Panel A (or Panel H) is the most superior (or inferior) level of the figure. In panels A-C, the rectus abdominis (R) is well developed in the anterior aspect of the internal intercostal (II). In panel D, the level of the umbilical vein exit, note the absence of ribs. The anterior sheath (arrowheads) is clearly identified at the medial side of the rectus abdominis (panels E-H). At a level below the umbilicus, part of the posterior sheath is absent (arrow with star in panel G) and the midline area (asterisk in panels G and H) is composed of dense connective tissue. The inferior epigastric artery (IEA) runs upward from panel H to panel F as a single trunk, and divides into two major branches at a level between panels E and F. All panels were prepared at the same magnification (scale bar in panel A). D, diaphragm; IO, internal oblique; T, transverses abdominis/thoracis; UA, umbilical artery; UR, urachus; EO, external oblique; S, sternum.

Reference

1. Williams PL. Gray's Anatomy. 1995. 38th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;825–829.

2. Munger GT, Munger BL. Differentiation of the anterior body wall and truncal epidermis and associated co-migration of cutaneous nerves and mesenchyme. Anat Rec. 1991. 231:261–274.

3. Gościcka D, Murawski E. Tendinous intersections of the rectus abdominis muscle in human fetuses. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 1980. 39:427–434.

4. Niikura H, Okamoto S, Nagase S, Takano T, Murakami G, Tatsumi H, et al. Fetal development of the human gubernaculum with special reference to the fasciae and muscles around it. Clin Anat. 2008. 21:547–557.

5. Rizk NN. A new description of the anterior abdominal wall. Anat Rec. 1976. 184:515.

6. Rizk NN. A new description of the anterior abdominal wall in man and mammals. J Anat. 1980. 131(Pt 3):373–385.

7. Rizk NN, Adieb N. The development of the anterior abdominal wall in the rat in the light of a new anatomical description. J Anat. 1982. 134(Pt 2):237–242.

8. Rao VS, Rao GRKH. The sternalis muscle. J Anat Soc India. 1954. 3:49–51.

9. Kacker GN. Sternalis muscle in U.P. Indian subjects. J Anat Soc India. 1960. 9:101–103.

10. Blees G. A peculiar type of sternalis muscle. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1968. 7:69–72.

11. Jeng H, Su SJ. The sternalis muscle: an uncommon anatomical variant among Taiwanese. J Anat. 1998. 193(Pt 2):287–288.

12. Saeed M, Murshid KR, Rufai AA, Elsayed SE, Sadiq MS. Sternalis. An anatomic variant of chest wall musculature. Saudi Med J. 2002. 23:1214–1221.

13. Rozen WM, Kapila S, Donahoe S. Why there are two rows of deep inferior epigastric artery perforators despite variability in the number of deep inferior epigastric artery trunks: an anatomical and embryological argument. Clin Anat. 2011. 24:786–788.

14. Klíma M. Early development of the human sternum and the problem of homologization of the so-called suprasternal structures. Acta Anat (Basel). 1968. 69:473–484.

15. Manley NR, Barrow JR, Zhang T, Capecchi MR. Hoxb2 and hoxb4 act together to specify ventral body wall formation. Dev Biol. 2001. 237:130–144.

16. Brewer S, Williams T. Loss of AP-2alpha impacts multiple aspects of ventral body wall development and closure. Dev Biol. 2004. 267:399–417.

17. Vermeij-Keers C, Hartwig NG, van der Werff JF. Embryonic development of the ventral body wall and its congenital malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996. 5:82–89.

18. Stevenson RE, Rogers RC, Chandler JC, Gauderer MW, Hunter AG. Escape of the yolk sac: a hypothesis to explain the embryogenesis of gastroschisis. Clin Genet. 2009. 75:326–333.

19. Christ B, Jacob M, Jacob HJ. On the origin and development of the ventrolateral abdominal muscles in the avian embryo. An experimental and ultrastructural study. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1983. 166:87–101.

20. Durland JL, Sferlazzo M, Logan M, Burke AC. Visualizing the lateral somitic frontier in the Prx1Cre transgenic mouse. J Anat. 2008. 212:590–602.

21. Nowicki JL, Takimoto R, Burke AC. The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterio-posterior regionalization in avian embryos. Mech Dev. 2003. 120:227–240.

22. Liem IK, Aoyama H. Body wall morphogenesis: limb-genesis interferes with body wall-genesis via its influence on the abaxial somite derivatives. Mech Dev. 2009. 126:198–211.

23. Evans DJ, Valasek P, Schmidt C, Patel K. Skeletal muscle translocation in vertebrates. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2006. 211:Suppl 1. 43–50.

24. Mehta V, Arora J, Yadav Y, Suri RK, Rath G. Rectus thoracis bifurcalis: a new variant in the anterior chest wall musculature. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2010. 51:799–801.

25. Ura R. Über die allgemeine Differenzierung der oberflächlichen Brustmuskeln mit besonderer Berűcksichtigung der Hautrumpfmuskeln der Säugetiere. Mitteil Med Gesellsch Tokyo. 1937. 51:216–288. 339–390.

26. Kida MY, Izumi A, Tanaka S. Sternalis muscle: topic for debate. Clin Anat. 2000. 13:138–140.

27. O'Neill MN, Folan-Curran J. Case report: bilateral sternalis muscles with a bilateral pectoralis major anomaly. J Anat. 1998. 193(Pt 2):289–292.

28. Jelev L, Georgiev G, Surchev L. The sternalis muscle in the Bulgarian population: classification of sternales. J Anat. 2001. 199(Pt 3):359–363.

29. Kitamura S, Yoshioka T, Kaneda M, Matsuoka K, Chen KL, Sakai A. [A case of the congenital partial defect of the pectoralis major--accompanied by the sternalis with enormous size]. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1985. 60:728–732.

30. Kida MY, Kudoh H. Innervation of the sternalis muscle accompanied by congenital partial absence of the pectoralis major muscle. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1991. 67:449–455.

31. Kumar H, Rath G, Sharma M, Kohli M, Rani B. Bilateral sternalis with unusual left-sided presentation: a clinical perspective. Yonsei Med J. 2003. 44:719–722.