Nat Prod Sci.  2019 Jun;25(2):143-149. 10.20307/nps.2019.25.2.143.

Enhanced Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties of Processed Eucommiae Cortex

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Natural Medicine Resources, Semyung University, Jecheon, Chungbuk 27136, Korea. hwalee@semyung.ac.kr
  • 2School of Industrial Bio-Pharmaceutical Science, Semyung University, Jecheon, Chungbuk 27136, Korea.

Abstract

Eucommiae Cortex (EC), bark of Eucommia ulmoides, has been known as a traditional medicine to regulate hypertension and immune system. Because silk of gum in the EC blocks the release of active ingredients, EC generally has been utilized after processing with carbonization or salt-water to breakdown it. This study aimed to investigate the differences of non-processed EC and processed EC on antioxidant and anticancer properties. Antioxidant capacity was assessed by measuring the content of total polyphenols, reducing power, and ABTS radical scavenging effect. And anticancer effects were examined by evaluating the viability of pancreatic cancer cells and wound healing ability. The results demonstrated that processed EC contained more content of polyphenols and exhibited more potent reducing power and radical scavenging effect than non-processed EC. In addition, processed EC more efficiently inhibited proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer cells. These results suggest that processing of medicinal plants can improve the biological properties such as antioxidant or anticancer activity, which may lead to the development of herbal medicine treatment technology.

Keyword

Eucommia ulmoides; Processing; Antioxidant; Pancreatic cancer; Cell proliferation

MeSH Terms

Carbon
Cell Proliferation
Eucommiaceae
Gingiva
Herbal Medicine
Hypertension
Immune System
Medicine, Traditional
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Plants, Medicinal
Polyphenols
Silk
Wound Healing
Carbon
Polyphenols
Silk

Figure

  • Fig. 1 HPLC chromatograms of pinoresinol diglucose (A), non-processed Eucommiae Cortex (B), carbonized Eucommiae Cortex (C), and salt-processed Eucommiae Cortex (D).

  • Fig. 2 The antioxidant effects of processed Eucommiae Cortex (EC). (A) The effect of non-processed EC (N-EC), carbonized EC (C-EC), and salt-processed EC (S-EC) on ABTS radical scavenging. (B) The reducing power of N-EC, C-EC, and S-EC. L-ascorbic acid (L-A, 100 µg/mL) was used as a positive control. Values were expressed as means ± S.D. *p < 0.05 indicates significant difference from the vehicle treatment.

  • Fig. 3 The inhibitory effect of processed Eucommiae Cortex (EC) on pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. The effect of non-processed EC (N-EC), carbonized EC (C-EC), and salt-processed EC (S-EC) on pancreatic cancer cell viability by MTT assay. Cells were treated with various concentrations of test samples for 48 h. And then, MTT solution was treated and formed formazan crystals were lysed with DMSO. The absorbance at 540 nm was measured. Values were expressed as means ± S.D. *p < 0.05 indicates significant difference from the vehicle treatment.

  • Fig. 4 The effect of processed Eucommiae Cortex (EC) on cell cycle distribution of PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells. Cells were treated with non-processed EC (N-EC), carbonized EC (C-EC), and salt-processed EC (S-EC) for 24 h. Fixed cells were stained with propidium iodide in the presence of RNase A for 45 min in the dark. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry.

  • Fig. 5 The effect of processed Eucommiae Cortex (EC) on migration of PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells. Migration of cancer cells by non-processed EC (N-EC), carbonized EC (C-EC), and salt-processed EC (S-EC) were evaluated by wound healing assay. Images are representative wound areas for three independent experiments that show similar results. Results were expressed as means ± S.D. *,# p < 0.05 indicates significant difference from the vehicle treatment.


Reference

1. Dai X, Huang Q, Zhou B, Gong Z, Liu Z, Shi S. Food Chem. 2013; 139:563–570.
2. Hsieh CL, Yen GC. Life Sci. 2000; 66:1387–1400.
3. Lang C, Liu Z, Taylor HW, Baker DG. Am J Chin Med. 2005; 33:215–230.
4. Choi YH, Seo JH, Kim JS, Heor JH, Kim SK, Choi SU, Kim YS, Kim YK, Ryu SY. Korean J Pharmacogn. 2003; 34:308–313.
5. Kim MC, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Park J, Kim HL, Kim SY, Ahn KS, Jang HJ, Lee SG, Lee KM, Hong SH, Um JY. Am J Chin Med. 2012; 40:135–149.
6. Hirata T, Kobayashi T, Wada A, Ueda T, Fujikawa T, Miyashita H, Ikeda T, Tsukamoto S, Nohara T. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011; 21:1786–1791.
7. Zhang R, Liu ZG, Li C, Hu SJ, Liu L, Wang JP, Mei QB. Bone. 2009; 45:553–559.
8. He X, Wang J, Li M, Hao D, Yang Y, Zhang C, He R, Tao R. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014; 151:78–92.
9. Chai X, Wang Y, Su Y, Bah AJ, Hu L, Gao Y, Gao X. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012; 57:52–61.
10. Seo CS, Kim JH, Shin HK, Kim BS. Korean J Pharmacogn. 2015; 46:123–132.
11. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965; 16:144–158.
12. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999; 26:1231–1237.
13. Oyaizu M. Jpn J Nutr. 1986; 44:307–315.
14. Chen XY, Luo LI, Ren GC, Qu GY, Dong LS. West China J Pharm Sci . 2008; 5:592–593.
15. Tao Y, Sheng C, Li WD, Cai BC, Lu TL. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2014; 39:4352–4355.
16. Yen GC, Hsieh CL. J Agric Food Chem. 1998; 46:3952–3957.
17. Hu W, Wang G, Li P, Wang Y, Si CL, He J, Long W, Bai Y, Feng Z, Wang X. Chem Biol Interact. 2014; 224:108–116.
18. Milkovic L, Siems W, Siems R, Zarkovic N. Curr Pharm Des. 2014; 20:6529–6542.
19. Talero E, Avila-Roman J, Motilva V. Curr Pharm Des. 2012; 18:3939–3965.
20. Zhu Y, Hao W, Li X. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 1997; 22:598–601.
21. Wells A, Grahovac J, Wheeler S, Ma B, Lauffenburger D. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 34:283–289.
22. Li Y, Han C, Wang J, Xiao W, Wang Z, Zhang J, Yang Y, Zhang S, Ai C. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014; 151:452–460.
23. Riaz A, Rasul A, Hussain G, Zahoor MK, Jabeen F, Subhani Z, Younis T, Ali M, Sarfraz I, Selamoglu Z. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2018; 2018:9794625.
24. Soromou LW, Chen N, Jiang L, Huo M, Wei M, Chu X, Millimouno FM, Feng H, Sidime Y, Deng X. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012; 419:256–261.
25. Cho IH, Gong JH, Kang MK, Lee EJ, Park JH, Park SJ, Kang YH. BMC Pulm Med. 2014; 14:122.
26. Chen M, Cai F, Zha D, Wang X, Zhang W, He Y, Huang Q, Zhuang H, Hua ZC. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:26941–26958.
27. Choi SY, Ko HC, Ko SY, Hwang JH, Park JG, Kang SH, Han SH, Yun SH, Kim S. J Biol Pharm Bull. 2007; 30:772–778.
28. Chen QC, Zhang WY, Jin W, Lee IS, Min BS, Jung HJ, Na M, Lee S, Bae K. Planta Med. 2010; 76:79–81.
29. Ganeshpurkar A, Saluja AK. Saudi Pharm J. 2017; 25:149–164.
30. Lin JP, Yang JS, Lu CC, Chiang JH, Wu CL, Lin JJ, Lin HL, Yang MD, Liu KC, Chiu TH, Chung JG. Leuk Res. 2009; 33:823–828.
31. Chen H, Miao Q, Geng M, Liu J, Hu Y, Tian L, Pan J, Yang Y. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:269165.
32. Araújo JR, Gonçalves P, Martel F. Nutr Res. 2011; 31:77–87.
Full Text Links
  • NPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr