J Clin Nutr.  2018 Jun;10(1):2-8. 10.15747/jcn.2018.10.1.2.

Clinical Outcomes of Nutritional Supply in Critically Ill Patients in the Prone Position

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 2College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. yjlee1117@snubh.org

Abstract

PURPOSE
Enteral nutrition is recommended in critically ill patients. On the other hand, the recommendation of nutritional support is limited and often controversial in critically ill patients in the prone position. Therefore, this study evaluated the clinical outcomes of nutritional support in critically ill patients in the prone position.
METHODS
A retrospective evaluation of the electronic medical records was conducted, including adult patients who were in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) in the prone position in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from May 1, 2015 to June 30, 2017. The patients' characteristics, nutritional support status while they were in the prone position, mortality in ICU and during hospitalization, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation days, and complications, such as ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and vomiting were collected.
RESULTS
In total, 100 patients were included. Of these, 12 received enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition and 88 received only parenteral nutrition. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, number of comorbidity, weight, PaOâ‚‚/FiOâ‚‚, hours of prone position, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. No differences were observed in ICU mortality (75.0% vs. 46.6%; P=0.065), hospital mortality (83.3% vs. 58.0%; P=0.081), ICU length of stay (22.2±14.6 vs. 18.2±21.2; P=0.128) and mechanical ventilation days (19.3±14.8 vs. 14.5±19.1; P=0.098). In addition, there were no differences in the possible complications of the prone position, such as VAP (8.3% vs. 4.5%; P=0.480) and vomiting (8.3% vs. 1.1%; P=0.227).
CONCLUSION
No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. Further studies will be needed to confirm the way of nutrition support while in the prone position.

Keyword

Prone position; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition; Critical illness

MeSH Terms

Adult
Comorbidity
Critical Illness*
Electronic Health Records
Enteral Nutrition
Hand
Hospital Mortality
Hospitalization
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Mortality
Nutritional Support
Parenteral Nutrition
Physiology
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
Prone Position*
Respiration, Artificial
Retrospective Studies
Seoul
Vomiting
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr