J Breast Cancer.  2018 Dec;21(4):433-441. 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e54.

Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Diagnosis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jeongeon.lee@samsung.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on recurrence and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients with cytology-proven axillary node metastasis.
METHODS
We selected patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis and were treated with NAC followed by curative surgery between January 2007 and December 2014. We classified patients into three groups: group A, negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and no further dissection; group B, negative SLN status with backup axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); and group C, no residual axillary metastasis on pathology with standard ALND.
RESULTS
The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 3-122 months) and the median number of retrieved SLNs was 5 (range, 2-9). The SLN identification rate was 98.3% (234/238 patients), and the false negative rate of SLNB after NAC was 7.5%. There was no significant difference in axillary recurrence-free survival (p=0.118), disease-free survival (DFS; p=0.578) or overall survival (OS; p=0.149) among groups A, B, and C. In the subgroup analysis of breast pathologic complete response (pCR) status, there was no significant difference in DFS (p=0.271, p=0.892) or OS (p=0.207, p=0.300) in the breast pCR and non-pCR patients.
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that SLNB can be feasible and oncologically safe after NAC for cytology-determined axillary node metastasis patients and could help reduce arm morbidity and lymphedema by avoiding ALND in SLN-negative patients.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Lymph node excision; Neoadjuvant therapy; Sentinel lymph node biopsy

MeSH Terms

Arm
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Diagnosis*
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Therapy*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Lymphedema
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Metastasis
Pathology
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Recurrence
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy*

Figure

  • Figure 1 Algorithm of patient selection and grouping of patients with initial cytology-determined nodal disease.ALN=axillary lymph node; SLNB=sentinel lymph node biopsy; SLN=sentinel lymph node; ALND=axillary lymph node dissection.

  • Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) between combined groups A–C and node-positive groups.

  • Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier curves for axillary recurrence-free survival (A), disease-free survival (B), and overall survival (C) among groups A, B, and C.

  • Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival and overall survival among groups A, B, and C in hormone receptor (HR)-positive (A) and HR-negative (B) patients.

  • Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival and overall survival among groups A, B, and C in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (A) and HER2-negative (B) patients.

  • Figure 6 Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival and overall survival among groups A, B, and C in breast pathologic complete response (pCR) (A) and non-pCR (B) patients.


Cited by  1 articles

Targeted axillary biopsy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Gunay Gurleyik, Sibel Aydin Aksu, Fügen Aker, Kubra Kaytaz Tekyol, Eda Tanrikulu, Emin Gurleyik
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021;100(6):305-312.    doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.6.305.


Reference

1. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15:2483–2493. PMID: 9215816.
Article
2. Vlastos G, Mirza NQ, Lenert JT, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Feig BW, et al. The feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma patients after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy. Cancer. 2000; 88:1417–1424. PMID: 10717625.
Article
3. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013; 310:1455–1461. PMID: 24101169.
4. Park S, Lee JE, Paik HJ, Ryu JM, Bae SY, Lee SK, et al. Feasibility and prognostic effect of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cytology-proven, node-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017; 17:e19–e29. PMID: 27495997.
Article
5. Enokido K, Watanabe C, Nakamura S, Ogiya A, Osako T, Akiyama F, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with an initial diagnosis of cytology-proven lymph node-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016; 16:299–304. PMID: 26993216.
Article
6. Shen J, Gilcrease MZ, Babiera GV, Ross MI, Meric-Bernstam F, Feig BW, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with documented axillary metastases. Cancer. 2007; 109:1255–1263. PMID: 17330229.
Article
7. Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, Kuerer H, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:9304–9311. PMID: 16361629.
Article
8. Rouzier R, Extra JM, Klijanienko J, Falcou MC, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:1304–1310. PMID: 11870173.
Article
9. Fu JF, Chen HL, Yang J, Yi CH, Zheng S. Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e105316. PMID: 25210779.
Article
10. Kang YJ, Han W, Park S, You JY, Yi HW, Park S, et al. Outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy-guided decisions in breast cancer patients with conversion from positive to negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 166:473–480. PMID: 28766131.
Article
11. Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, Smith R, Julian T, Miller B, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:2694–2702. PMID: 15837984.
Article
12. van Deurzen CH, Vriens BE, Tjan-Heijnen VC, van der Wall E, Albregts M, van Hilligersberg R, et al. Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45:3124–3130. PMID: 19716287.
Article
13. Mocellin S, Goldin E, Marchet A, Nitti D. Sentinel node biopsy performance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2016; 138:472–480. PMID: 26084763.
Article
14. Lee S, Kim EY, Kang SH, Kim SW, Kim SK, Kang KW, et al. Sentinel node identification rate, but not accuracy, is significantly decreased after pre-operative chemotherapy in axillary node-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007; 102:283–288. PMID: 17063280.
Article
15. Kim JY, Kim MK, Lee JE, Jung Y, Bae SY, Lee SK, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initial cytology-proven axillary node metastasis. J Breast Cancer. 2015; 18:22–28. PMID: 25834607.
Article
16. Newman EA, Sabel MS, Nees AV, Schott A, Diehl KM, Cimmino VM, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in patients with documented node-positive breast cancer at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14:2946–2952. PMID: 17514407.
Article
17. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:7703–7720. PMID: 16157938.
Article
18. Miltenburg DM, Miller C, Karamlou TB, Brunicardi FC. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. J Surg Res. 1999; 84:138–142. PMID: 10357910.
Article
19. Fraile M, Rull M, Julián FJ, Fusté F, Barnadas A, Llatjós M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy as a practical alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients: an approach to its validity. Ann Oncol. 2000; 11:701–705. PMID: 10942059.
Article
20. Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1072–1078. PMID: 26811528.
Article
21. Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, Holloway CM, Gaboury L, Sideris L, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:258–264. PMID: 25452445.
Article
22. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:609–618. PMID: 23683750.
Article
23. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:500–515. PMID: 23540561.
Article
24. Warren LE, Miller CL, Horick N, Skolny MN, Jammallo LS, Sadek BT, et al. The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88:565–571. PMID: 24411624.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr