Korean J Radiol.  2017 ;18(4):749-752. 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.749.

RE: Should We Use a Monopolar or Bipolar Mode for Performing No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors? Clinical Practice Might have Already Resolved the Matter Once and for All

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Jean Verdier Hospital, Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis Universitary Hospitals, Bondy 93140, France. olivier.seror@aphp.fr
  • 2Mixt Research Unit 1162, Fonctional Genomic of Solide Tumor, Natrional Institut of Research in Healthcare, Paris 75010, France.
  • 3Unitú de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Paris 13 Universitary, Sorbonne Paris Cité Unversitary Groupmnent, Bobigny 93000, France.

Abstract

No abstract available.

Keyword

Minimally invasive; Bovine; Preclinical; Radiofrequency ablation; No-touch technique; Hepatocellular carcinoma

MeSH Terms

Bipolar Disorder
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
*Catheter Ablation
Humans
Liver
*Liver Neoplasms

Cited by  1 articles

Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources
Dong Ho Lee, Jeong Min Lee
Korean J Radiol. 2018;19(4):545-559.    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.545.


Reference

1. Chang W, Lee JM, Lee SM, Han JK. No-touch radiofrequency ablation: a comparison of switching bipolar and switching monopolar ablation in ex vivo bovine liver. Korean J Radiol. 2017; 18:279–288. PMID: 28246508.
2. Seror O. Ablative therapies: advantages and disadvantages of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, microwave and electroporation methods, or how to choose the right method for an individual patient? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015; 96:617–624. PMID: 25981214.
3. Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011; 258:351–369. PMID: 21273519.
Article
4. Pillai K, Akhter J, Chua TC, Shehata M, Alzahrani N, Al-Alem I, et al. Heat sink effect on tumor ablation characteristics as observed in monopolar radiofrequency, bipolar radiofrequency, and microwave, using ex vivo calf liver model. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e580. PMID: 25738477.
5. Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Rabahi Y, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrié N, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma within milan criteria: no-touch multibipolar radiofrequency ablation for treatment-long-term results. Radiology. 2016; 280:611–621. PMID: 27010381.
Article
6. Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Van Nhieu JT, Rabahi Y, Nahon P, Laurent A, et al. Histopathologic comparison of monopolar versus no-touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation to treat hepatocellular carcinoma within milan criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25:599–607. PMID: 24529547.
Article
7. Hocquelet A, Aubé C, Rode A, Cartier V, Sutter O, Manichon AF, et al. Comparison of no-touch multi-bipolar vs. monopolar radiofrequency ablation for small HCC. J Hepatol. 2017; 66:67–74. PMID: 27422750.
Article
8. Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, et al. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007; 245:36–43. PMID: 17197963.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr