Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2018 Jan;61(1):111-117. 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.111.

Clinical experience of long-term use of dienogest after surgery for ovarian endometrioma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ogjeong@ewha.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Delhi, India.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Endometriosis is a common and recurring gynecologic disease which have afflicting females of reproductive age. We investigated the efficacy of long-term, post-operative use of dienogest for ovarian endometrioma.
METHODS
We studied 203 patients who had undergone laparoscopic or robotic surgery for ovarian endometrioma, and were administrated dienogest 2 mg/day beginning in July of 2013, and continuing. We evaluated side effects of dienogest and ultrasonography was performed every 6 months to detect potential recurrence of endometrioma (2 cm) in these post-surgical patients.
RESULTS
The follow-up observation periods were 30.2±20.9 months from surgery. The mean age was 34.1±7.2 years old. The mean diameter of pre-operative endometrioma was 5.6±3.0 cm2. One hundred eighty-two (89.7%) women received dienogest continuously for 12.0±7.1 months. Of the subjects, 21 (10.3%) patients discontinued dienogest at 2.4±1.0 months. The most common side effect when dienogest was discontinued was abnormal uterine bleeding. The occurrence rate of vaginal bleeding was 15.8%, a number which did not differ significantly in patients with/without post-operative gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist administration. The other side effects were gastrointestinal trouble including constipation, acne, headache, depression, hot flush, weight gain, and edema. However, no serious adverse events or side effects were documented and recurrent endometriomas were diagnosed in 3 patients (1.5%).
CONCLUSION
The data indicates that dienogest was both tolerable and safe for long-term use as prophylaxis in an effort to obviate the recurrence of ovarian endometrioma post-operatively, as well as potential need for surgical re-intervention.

Keyword

Dienogest; Endometriosis; Recurrence

MeSH Terms

Acne Vulgaris
Constipation
Depression
Edema
Endometriosis*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genital Diseases, Female
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Headache
Humans
Recurrence
Ultrasonography
Uterine Hemorrhage
Weight Gain
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

Reference

1. Rogers PA, D’Hooghe TM, Fazleabas A, Gargett CE, Giudice LC, Montgomery GW, et al. Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod Sci. 2009; 16:335–346.
2. Allen C, Hopewell S, Prentice A. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; CD004753.
Article
3. D'Hooghe TM. Endometriosis. In : Berek JS, Novak E, editors. Berek & Novak's gynaecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2012. p. 505–556.
4. Liu X, Yuan L, Shen F, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Guo SW. Patterns of and risk factors for recurrence in women with ovarian endometriomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109:1411–1420.
Article
5. Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; CD004992.
Article
6. Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 15:441–461.
Article
7. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29:400–412.
Article
8. Leyland N, Casper R, Laberge P, Singh SS. SOGC. Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 32:S1–32.
9. Rizk B, Turki R, Lotfy H, Ranganathan S, Zahed H, Freeman AR, et al. Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2015; 7:109–118.
10. Ferrero S, Scala C, Racca A, Calanni L, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, et al. Second surgery for recurrent unilateral endometriomas and impact on ovarian reserve: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103:1236–1243.
11. Roustan A, Perrin J, Debals-Gonthier M, Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Agostini A, Courbiere B. Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30:840–847.
12. Muzii L, Achilli C, Lecce F, Bianchi A, Franceschetti S, Marchetti C, et al. Second surgery for recurrent endometriomas is more harmful to healthy ovarian tissue and ovarian reserve than first surgery. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103:738–743.
Article
13. Ouchi N, Akira S, Mine K, Ichikawa M, Takeshita T. Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision: risk factors and prevention. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40:230–236.
Article
14. Köhler G, Faustmann TA, Gerlinger C, Seitz C, Mueck AO. A dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy and safety of 1, 2, and 4mg of dienogest daily for endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 108:21–25.
15. Schindler AE. Dienogest in long-term treatment of endometriosis. Int J Womens Health. 2011; 3:175–184.
Article
16. Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Viganò P, De Matteis S, Barbara G, Fedele L. Post-operative endometriosis recurrence: a plea for prevention based on pathogenetic, epidemiological and clinical evidence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 21:259–265.
Article
17. Takaesu Y, Nishi H, Kojima J, Sasaki T, Nagamitsu Y, Kato R, et al. Dienogest compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after conservative surgery for endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016; 42:1152–1158.
Article
18. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Pietropaolo G, Frontino G, Somigliana E, Crosignani PG. Progestogens for endometriosis: forward to the past. Hum Reprod Update. 2003; 9:387–396.
Article
19. Strowitzki T, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Schumacher U, Ahlers C, Seitz C. Safety and tolerability of dienogest in endometriosis: pooled analysis from the European clinical study program. Int J Womens Health. 2015; 7:393–401.
Article
20. Sengoku K, Miyamoto T, Horikawa M, Katayama H, Nishiwaki K, Kato Y, et al. Clinicopathologic risk factors for recurrence of ovarian endometrioma following laparoscopic cystectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 92:278–284.
Article
21. Somigliana E, Viganò P, Tirelli AS, Felicetta I, Torresani E, Vignali M, et al. Use of the concomitant serum dosage of CA 125, CA 19-9 and interleukin-6 to detect the presence of endometriosis. Results from a series of reproductive age women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19:1871–1876.
Article
22. Harada T, Kubota T, Aso T. Usefulness of CA19-9 versus CA125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78:733–739.
Article
23. Shen A, Xu S, Ma Y, Guo H, Li C, Yang C, et al. Diagnostic value of serum CA125, CA19-9 and CA15-3 in endometriosis: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2015; 43:599–609.
Article
24. Guzel AI, Topcu HO, Ekilinc S, Tokmak A, Kokanali MK, Cavkaytar S, et al. Recurrence factors in women underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrioma. Minerva Chir. 2014; 69:277–282.
25. Koga K, Takemura Y, Osuga Y, Yoshino O, Hirota Y, Hirata T, et al. Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21:2171–2174.
Article
26. Park SY, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kim CH, Kang BM. Efficacy and safety of dienogest in patients with endometriosis: a single-center observational study over 12 months. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016; 43:215–220.
Article
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr