J Dent Anesth Pain Med.  2018 Aug;18(4):223-233. 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.4.223.

The efficiency of topical anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: A review of use in dentistry

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. natthamet.won@mahidol.ac.th
  • 2Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

Topical anesthetics are commonly used in oral & maxillofacial surgery to control pain in the oral cavity mucosa before local anesthetic injection. These anesthetic agents come in many forms, developed for different usages, to minimize adverse reactions, and for optimal anesthetic efficiency. Earlier studies have revealed that these agents may also limit the growth of microorganisms in the area of anesthetic application. Many topical anesthetic agents show different levels of antimicrobial activity against various bacterial strains and Candida. The dosage of local anesthetic agent used in some clinical preparations is too low to show a significant effect on microbial activity. Efficiency of antimicrobial activity depends on the local anesthetic agent's properties of diffusion within the bloodstream and binding efficiency with cytoplasmic membrane, which is followed by disruption of the bacterial cell membrane. The antimicrobial properties of these agents may extend their usage in patients to both control pain and infection. To develop the topical local anesthetic optimal usage and antimicrobial effect, a collaborating antiseptic agent may be used to benefit the local anesthetic. However, more research is required regarding minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of topical local anesthetic agents with drug interaction between anesthetics and antiseptic agents.

Keyword

Antimicrobial Activity; Local Anesthetics; Microorganism; Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; Topical Anesthesia

MeSH Terms

Anesthetics*
Anesthetics, Local
Anti-Infective Agents*
Candida
Cell Membrane
Dentistry*
Diffusion
Drug Interactions
Humans
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mouth
Mucous Membrane
Surgery, Oral
Anesthetics
Anesthetics, Local
Anti-Infective Agents

Reference

1. Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008; 9:205–213. PMID: 18426354.
Article
2. Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local anesthesia: agents, techniques, and complications. Dent Clin North Am. 2012; 56:133–148. ixPMID: 22117947.
Article
3. Baltch AL, Schaffer C, Hammer MC, Sutphen NT, Smith RP, Conroy J, et al. Bacteremia following dental cleaning in patients with and without penicillin prophylaxis. Am Heart J. 1982; 104:1335–1339. PMID: 7148652.
Article
4. Roberts GJ, Simmons NB, Longhurst P, Hewitt PB. Bacteraemia following local anaesthetic injections in children. Br Dent J. 1998; 185:295–298. PMID: 9803037.
Article
5. Barbosa M, Carmona IT, Amaral B, Limeres J, Alvarez M, Cerqueira C, et al. General anesthesia increases the risk of bacteremia following dental extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110:706–712. PMID: 20580576.
Article
6. Covino BG. Pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Br J Anaesth. 1986; 58:701–716. PMID: 2425835.
Article
7. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012; 59:90–101. PMID: 22822998.
Article
8. Petrikas AZH, Egorova VA, Ermilova KV. Articaine and adrenaline combinations efficacy for dental anesthesia. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2009; 88:24–26.
9. Eggleston ST, Lush LW. Understanding allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother. 1996; 30:851–857. PMID: 8826570.
Article
10. Leonard M. Carl Koller: mankind's greatest benefactor? The story of local anesthesia. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:535–538. PMID: 9539455.
Article
11. Keller BJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics and a placebo in reducing injection pain. Hawaii Dent J. 1985; 16:10–11.
12. Cash C, Arnold DH. Extreme Methemoglobinemia After Topical Benzocaine: Recognition by Pulse Oximetry. J Pediatr. 2017; 181:319. PMID: 27881239.
Article
13. Lee HS. Recent advances in topical anesthesia. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 16:237–244. PMID: 28879311.
Article
14. Davis KL, Channick CL. Safety of topical tetracaine in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2009; 16:95–98. PMID: 23168506.
Article
15. Bagesund M, Tabrizi P. Lidocaine 20% patch vs lidocaine 5% gel for topical anaesthesia of oral mucosa. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008; 18:452–460. PMID: 18341564.
16. Roghani S, Duperon DF, Barcohana N. Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics. Pediatr Dent. 1999; 21:197–200. PMID: 10355012.
17. Kirk LM, Brown SD, Luu Y, Ogle A, Huffman J, Lewis PO. Beyond-use dating of lidocaine alone and in two “magic mouthwash” preparations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017; 74:e202–e210. PMID: 28438825.
Article
18. Mayor-Subirana G, Yague-Garcia J, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Anesthetic efficacy of Oraqix(R) versus Hurricaine(R) and placebo for pain control during non-surgical periodontal treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19:e192–e201. PMID: 24316699.
19. Guay J. Adverse events associated with intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block): a systematic review of complications. J Clin Anesth. 2009; 21:585–594. PMID: 20122591.
Article
20. Speirs AF, Taylor KH, Joanes DN, Girdler NM. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of topical skin analgesics and the anxiety and discomfort associated with venous cannulation. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:444–449. PMID: 11352393.
Article
21. McMillan AS, Walshaw D, Meechan JG. The efficacy of Emla and 5% lignocaine gel for anaesthesia of human gingival mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 38:58–61. PMID: 10783450.
Article
22. Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Latha R. Use of EMLA: is it an injection free alternative? J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001; 25:215–219. PMID: 12049081.
Article
23. Jackson D, Chen AH, Bennett CR. Identifying true lidocaine allergy. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125:1362–1366. PMID: 7844301.
24. Wilson AW, Deacock S, Downie IP, Zaki G. Allergy to local anaesthetic: the importance of thorough investigation. Br Dent J. 2000; 188:120–122. PMID: 10717997.
Article
25. Meechan JG. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2002; 46:759–766. PMID: 12436830.
Article
26. Parker JF, Vats A, Bauer G. EMLA toxicity after application for allergy skin testing. Pediatrics. 2004; 113:410–411. PMID: 14754960.
Article
27. Tran AN, Koo JY. Risk of systemic toxicity with topical lidocaine/prilocaine: a review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014; 13:1118–1122. PMID: 25226014.
28. Larson A, Stidham T, Banerji S, Kaufman J. Seizures and methemoglobinemia in an infant after excessive EMLA application. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013; 29:377–379. PMID: 23462397.
Article
29. Strichartz G. Molecular mechanisms of nerve block by local anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 1976; 45:421–441. PMID: 9844.
Article
30. Myers MI, Peltier AC. Uses of skin biopsy for sensory and autonomic nerve assessment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013; 13:323. PMID: 23250768.
Article
31. Schmidt RM, Rosenkranz HS. Antimicrobial activity of local anesthetics: lidocaine and procaine. J Infect Dis. 1970; 121:597–607. PMID: 4393033.
Article
32. James FM, George RH, Naiem H, White GJ. Bacteriologic aspects of epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 1976; 55:187–190. PMID: 943977.
Article
33. Rosenberg PH, Renkonen OV. Antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine and morphine. Anesthesiology. 1985; 62:178–179. PMID: 3918482.
Article
34. Hodson M, Gajraj R, Scott NB. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine: an in vitro study with bacteria implicated in epidural infection. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54:699–702. PMID: 10417467.
35. Grimmond TR, Brownridge P. Antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine and pethidine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986; 14:418–420. PMID: 3105346.
Article
36. Noda H, Saionji K, Miyazaki T. Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics. Masui. 1990; 39:994–1001. PMID: 2232143.
Article
37. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K. Bactericidal activity of clinically used local anesthetics on Staphylococcus aureus. Reg Anesth. 1996; 21:239–242. PMID: 8744667.
38. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K. Bactericidal activity of 0.5% bupivacaine with preservatives on microorganisms in the human skin flora. Reg Anesth. 1997; 22:178–184. PMID: 9089861.
Article
39. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K. Bactericidal activity of preservative-free bupivacaine on microorganisms in the human skin flora. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998; 42:1096–1099. PMID: 9809095.
Article
40. Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001; 18:687–694. PMID: 11553246.
Article
41. Mullin GS, Rubinfeld RS. The antibacterial activity of topical anesthetics. Cornea. 1997; 16:662–665. PMID: 9395876.
Article
42. Pere P, Lindgren L, Vaara M. Poor antibacterial effect of ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:884–886. PMID: 10485806.
43. Rodrigues AA, Pina-Vaz C, Mardh PA, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, Freitas-da-Fonseca A. Inhibition of germ tube formation by Candida albicans by local anesthetics: an effect related to ionic channel blockade. Curr Microbiol. 2000; 40:145–148. PMID: 10679044.
44. Batai I, Kerenyi M, Falvai J, Szabo G. Bacterial growth in ropivacaine hydrochloride. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94:729–731. PMID: 11867406.
45. Parr AM, Zoutman DE, Davidson JS. Antimicrobial activity of lidocaine against bacteria associated with nosocomial wound infection. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 43:239–245. PMID: 10490173.
Article
46. Pelz K, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Bogdan C, Otten JE. Analysis of the antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics used for dental analgesia. J Med Microbiol. 2008; 57:88–94. PMID: 18065672.
Article
47. Berg JO, Mossner BK, Skov MN, Lauridsen J, Gottrup F, Kolmos HJ. Antibacterial properties of EMLA and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen. 2006; 14:581–585. PMID: 17014670.
48. Sedef Gocmen J, Buyukkocak U, Caglayan O, Aksoy A. In vitro antibacterial effects of topical local anesthetics. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008; 19:351–353. PMID: 18608709.
49. Liu K, Ye L, Sun W, Hao L, Luo Y, Chen J. Does Use of Lidocaine Affect Culture of Synovial Fluid Obtained to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)? An In Vitro Study. Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:448–452. PMID: 29360804.
50. Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG, Sansonetty F, Martinez-De-Oliveira J, Fonseca AF, Mardh PA. Antifungal activity of local anesthetics against Candida species. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 8:124–137. PMID: 10968594.
Article
51. Abdelaziz AA, el-Nakeeb MA. Sporicidal activity of local anaesthetics and their binary combinations with preservatives. J Basic Microbiol. 1987; 27:403–410. PMID: 3134539.
Article
52. Silva MT, Sousa JC, Polonia JJ, Macedo PM. Effects of local anesthetics on bacterial cells. J Bacteriol. 1979; 137:461–468. PMID: 104970.
Article
53. Leung YW, Rawal BD. Mechanism of action of tetracaine hydrochloride against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis. 1977; 136:679–683. PMID: 410897.
54. Fazly Bazaz BS, Salt WG. Local anaesthetics as antibacterial agents: effects on cellular respiration and the leakage of cytoplasmic constituents. Microbios. 1983; 37:139–149. PMID: 6353168.
55. Rodrigues A, Vaz CP, Fonseca AF, de Oliveira JM, Barros H. In vitro effect of local anesthetics on candida albicans germ tube formation. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 1:193–197. PMID: 18475344.
56. Schmidt RM, Rosenkranz HS, Ryan JF. Inhibition of DNA synthesis by lidocaine and procaine. Experientia. 1971; 27:261–262. PMID: 5546633.
Article
57. Reynolds MM, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Patel R, Pulido JS. Selected Antimicrobial Activity of Topical Ophthalmic Anesthetics. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5:2.
Article
58. Anding K, Albrecht P, Heilmann C, Daschner F. The bactericidal effect of oxybuprocaine. A possible cause of false negative results in bronchoalveolar lavage. Anaesthesist. 1993; 42:619–622. PMID: 8214534.
59. Olsen KM, Peddicord TE, Campbell GD, Rupp ME. Antimicrobial effects of lidocaine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000; 45:217–219. PMID: 10660504.
Article
60. Chandan SS, Faoagali J, Wainwright CE. Sensitivity of respiratory bacteria to lignocaine. Pathology. 2005; 37:305–307. PMID: 16194830.
Article
61. Aldous WK, Jensen R, Sieck BM. Cocaine and lidocaine with phenylephrine as topical anesthetics: antimicrobial activity against common nasal pathogens. Ear Nose Throat J. 1998; 77:554–557. PMID: 9693473.
Article
62. Stratford AF, Zoutman DE, Davidson JS. Effect of lidocaine and epinephrine on Staphylococcus aureus in a guinea pig model of surgical wound infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110:1275–1279. PMID: 12360067.
63. Lu CW, Lin TY, Shieh JS, Wang MJ, Chiu KM. Antimicrobial effect of continuous lidocaine infusion in a Staphylococcus aureus-induced wound infection in a mouse model. Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 73:598–601. PMID: 25310128.
64. Rahn R. Endocarditis risk from dental procedures. Zahnarztl Prax. 1989; 40:48–52. PMID: 2623985.
65. Roberts MC. Antibiotic resistance in oral/respiratory bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998; 9:522–540. PMID: 9825225.
Article
66. Baltch AL, Pressman HL, Hammer MC, Sutphen NC, Smith RP, Shayegani M. Bacteremia following dental extractions in patients with and without penicillin prophylaxis. Am J Med Sci. 1982; 283:129–140. PMID: 7044125.
Article
67. Diz Dios P, Tomas Carmona I, Limeres Posse J, Medina Henriquez J, Fernandez Feijoo J, Alvarez Fernandez M. Comparative efficacies of amoxicillin, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin in prevention of bacteremia following dental extractions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50:2996–3002. PMID: 16940094.
Article
68. Ramos E, Santamaria J, Santamaria G, Barbier L, Arteagoitia I. Do systemic antibiotics prevent dry socket and infection after third molar extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 122:403–425. PMID: 27499028.
Article
69. Reiland MD, Ettinger KS, Lohse CM, Viozzi CF. Does Administration of Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Third Molar Removal Have an Effect on the Incidence of Alveolar Osteitis or Postoperative Surgical Site Infections? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75:1801–1808. PMID: 28438595.
Article
70. Otten JE, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Jahnke H, Pelz K. Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 74:627–635. PMID: 15889436.
Article
71. Pineiro A, Tomas I, Blanco J, Alvarez M, Seoane J, Diz P. Bacteraemia following dental implants' placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:913–918. PMID: 20701619.
72. Genovesi A, Barone A, Toti P, Covani U. The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine versus 0.12% chlorhexidine plus hyaluronic acid mouthwash on healing of submerged single implant insertion areas: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017; 15:65–72. PMID: 26084554.
Article
73. Chaveli-López B, Bagán-Sebastián JV. Treatment of oral mucositis due to chemotherapy. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8:e201–e209. PMID: 27034762.
Article
74. Maria OM, Eliopoulos N, Muanza T. Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis. Front Oncol. 2017; 7:89. PMID: 28589080.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JDAPM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr