Korean J Med Educ.  2017 Jun;29(2):101-109. 10.3946/kjme.2017.57.

Do medical students generate sound arguments during small group discussions in problem-based learning?: an analysis of preclinical medical students' argumentation according to a framework of hypothetico-deductive reasoning

Affiliations
  • 1Innovation Center for Medical Education, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. hyunjung@inje.ac.kr
  • 2Learning, Design, and Technology Program, The University of Georgia College of Education, Athens, GA, USA.
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Hypothetico-deductive reasoning (HDR) is an essential learning activity and a learning outcome in problem-based learning (PBL). It is important for medical students to engage in the HDR process through argumentation during their small group discussions in PBL. This study aimed to analyze the quality of preclinical medical students' argumentation according to each phase of HDR in PBL.
METHODS
Participants were 15 first-year preclinical students divided into two small groups. A set of three 2-hour discussion sessions from each of the two groups during a 1-week-long PBL unit on the cardiovascular system was audio-recorded. The arguments constructed by the students were analyzed using a coding scheme, which included four types of argumentation (Type 0: incomplete, Type 1: claim only, Type 2: claim with data, and Type 3: claim with data and warrant). The mean frequency of each type of argumentation according to each HDR phase across the two small groups was calculated.
RESULTS
During small group discussions, Type 1 arguments were generated most often (frequency=120.5, 43%), whereas the least common were Type 3 arguments (frequency=24.5, 8.7%) among the four types of arguments.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study revealed that the students predominantly made claims without proper justifications; they often omitted data for supporting their claims or did not provide warrants to connect the claims and data. The findings suggest instructional interventions to enhance the quality of medical students' arguments in PBL, including promoting students' comprehension of the structure of argumentation for HDR processes and questioning.

Keyword

Argumentation; Hypothetico-deductive reasoning; Problem-based learning

MeSH Terms

Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods
Female
Humans
*Interprofessional Relations
Male
Peer Group
Personal Satisfaction
*Problem Solving
Problem-Based Learning/*methods
Students, Medical/*psychology
Young Adult
Full Text Links
  • KJME
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr