J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2018 Mar;61(2):277-281. 10.3340/jkns.2017.0197.

Additional Surgical Method Aimed to Increase Distractive Force during Occipitocervical Stabilization : Technical Note

• Antar V
• Turk O

• KMID: 2408030
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0197

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
Craniovertebral junctional anomalies constitute a technical challenge. Surgical opening of atlantoaxial joint region is a complex procedure especially in patients with nuchal deformity like basilar invagination. This region has actually very complicated anatomical and functional characteristics, including multiple joints providing extension, flexion, and wide rotation. In fact, it is also a bottleneck region where bones, neural structures, and blood vessels are located. Stabilization surgery regarding this region should consider the fact that the area exposes excessive and life-long stress due to complex movements and human posture. Therefore, all options should be considered for surgical stabilization, and they could be interchanged during the surgery, if required.
METHODS
A 53-year-old male patient applied to outpatients' clinic with complaints of head and neck pain persisting for a long time. Physical examination was normal except increased deep tendon reflexes. The patient was on long-term corticosteroid due to an allergic disease. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography findings indicated basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation. The patient underwent C0-C3-C4 (lateral mass) and additional C0-C2 (translaminar) stabilization surgery.
RESULTS
In routine practice, the sites where rods are bound to occipital plates were placed as paramedian. Instead, we inserted lateral mass screw to the sites where occipital screws were inserted on the occipital plate, thereby creating a site where extra rod could be bound. When C2 translaminar screw is inserted, screw caps remain on the median plane, which makes them difficult to bind to contralateral system. These bind directly to occipital plate without any connection from this region to the contralateral system. Advantages of this technique include easy insertion of C2 translaminar screws, presence of increased screw sizes, and exclusion of pullout forces onto the screw from neck movements. Another advantage of the technique is the median placement of the rod; i.e., thick part of the occipital bone is in alignment with axial loading.
CONCLUSION
We believe that this technique, which could be easily performed as adjuvant to classical stabilization surgery with no need for special screw and rod, may improve distraction force in patients with low bone density.

Keyword

Spine; Craniovertebral; Screws

MeSH Terms

Atlanto-Axial Joint
Blood Vessels
Bone Density
Congenital Abnormalities
Dislocations
Head
Humans
Joints
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Methods*
Middle Aged
Neck
Neck Pain
Occipital Bone
Physical Examination
Posture
Reflex, Stretch
Spine

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography findings indicated basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation.

• 

  Fig. 2 The sites where rods are bound to occipital plates were placed as paramedian. Instead, we inserted lateral mass screw to the sites where occipital screws were inserted on the occipital plate, thereby creating a site where extra rod could be bound.

• 

  Fig. 3 Postoperative images showed narrowed atlantodental interval with relief of compression on the spinal nerve.

Reference

References

1. Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 60:279–284. 1978.

2. Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, Hadley MN. The interspinous method of posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis. J Neurosurg. 74:190–198. 1991.

3. Du S, Ni B, Lu X, Xie N, Guo X, Guo Q, et al. Application of unilateral C2 translaminar screw in the treatment for atlantoaxial iInstability as an alternative or salvage of pedicle screw fixation. World Neurosurg. 97:86–92. 2017.

4. Haher TR, Yeung AW, Caruso SA, Merola AA, Shin T, Zipnick RI, et al. Occipital screw pullout strength. A biomechanical investigation of occipital morphology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 24:5–9. 1999.

5. Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26:2467–2471. 2001.

6. Gallie WE. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg. 46:495–499. 1939.

7. Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 129:47–53. 1994.

8. Goel A. Is inclusion of the occipital bone necessary/counter-effective for craniovertebral junction stabilization? J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 6:102–104. 2015.

9. Goel A, Jankharia B, Shah A, Sathe P. Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 25:740–744. 2016.

10. Gorek J, Acaroglu E, Berven S, Yousef A, Puttlitz CM. Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30:1513–1518. 2005.

11. Lee MJ, Cassinelli E, Riew KD. The feasibility of inserting atlas lateral mass screws via the posterior arch. Spine Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 31:2798–2801. 2006.

12. Magerl F, Seeman PS. Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. In : Kehr P, Weider A, editors. Cervical Spine I. Vienna: Spinger;1987. p. 322–327.

13. Marcotte P, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Karahalios DG, Drabier J. Posterior atlantoaxial facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg. 79:234–237. 1993.

14. Mendelsohn D, Dea N, Lee R, Boyd MC. Bilateral pedicle and crossed translaminar screws in C2. Asian Spine J. 9:783–788. 2015.

15. Menezes AH. Dorsal occipitocervical fusion: rod and wiring techniques. In : Kim DM, Vaccaro AR, Fessler RG, editors. Spinal Instrumentation: Surgical Techniques. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers;2005. p. 14–19.

16. Ransford AO, Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Thomas NP, Nelson IW. Craniocervical instability treated by contoured loop fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 68:173–177. 1986.

17. Takayasu M, Aoyama M, Joko M, Takeuchi M. Surgical Intervention for instability of the craniovertebral junction. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 56:465–475. 2016.

18. Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yi P, Li Z, et al. Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 28:888–895. 2003.

19. Wright NM. Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech. 17:158–162. 2004.

20. Yew A, Lu D, Lu DC. CT-based morphometric analysis of C1 laminar dimensions: C1 translaminar screw fixation is a feasible technique for salvage of atlantoaxial fusions. Surg Neurol Int. 6(Suppl 4):S236–S239. 2015.