J Breast Cancer.  2017 Dec;20(4):347-355. 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.4.347.

Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil as Palliative Treatment for Heavily Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. moisa@snu.ac.kr
  • 3Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy beyond standard treatment for anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
METHODS
We consecutively enrolled 158 MBC patients who underwent CMF chemotherapy in a palliative setting at two academic hospitals in Korea between 2002 and 2016.
RESULTS
The median age of the 158 enrolled patients was 51 years (range, 30-77 years). The enrolled patients were treated with a median of 5 lines of systemic treatment (range, 2-11) before CMF therapy, and the median time from diagnosis of MBC to CMF administration was 36.0 months (range, 7.1-146.7 months). The median number of cycles of CMF treatment was 3 (range, 1-19), and the relative dose intensity was 90.4%. The toxicity profile was mild, with an observed 3.1% of grade 2 and 5.0% of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Among 147 patients (93.0%) whose response to CMF was evaluated, the response rate was 10.9% (16/147), with complete response (CR) in one and partial response (PR) in 15. In addition, the disease control rate (calculated as CR+PR+stable disease) was 44.2% (65/147). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.6) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.1-11.6), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CMF therapy is effective and tolerable as salvage treatment for heavily pretreated MBC.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Cyclophosphamide; Fluorouracil; Methotrexate; Palliative care

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Cyclophosphamide*
Diagnosis
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Therapy
Fluorouracil*
Humans
Korea
Methotrexate*
Neutropenia
Palliative Care*
Retrospective Studies*
Salvage Therapy
Cyclophosphamide
Fluorouracil
Methotrexate

Figure

  • Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).

  • Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival (PFS) based on cancer biologic subtype (A), disease control rate (B), and response rate (C).HR=hormone receptor; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; TNBC=triple-negative breast cancer; HR-positive=HR-positive/HER2-negative; HER2-positive=HR-positive or negative/HER2-positive; TNBC=HR-negative/HER2-negative; CR=complete response; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease; PD=disease progression.


Reference

1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65:87–108. PMID: 25651787.
Article
2. Arriagada R, Spielmann M, Koscielny S, Le Chevalier T, Delozier T, Ducourtieux M, et al. Patterns of failure in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13:1378–1386. PMID: 12196363.
Article
3. Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, LoRusso PM, Kuter I, Vogel C, et al. Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17:485–493. PMID: 10080589.
Article
4. Oshaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, Jones SE, Miles D, Bell D, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001; 12:1247–1254. PMID: 11697835.
5. Vahdat LT, Pruitt B, Fabian CJ, Rivera RR, Smith DA, Tan-Chiu E, et al. Phase II study of eribulin mesylate, a halichondrin B analog, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:2954–2961. PMID: 19349550.
Article
6. Livingston RB, Ellis GK, Gralow JR, Williams MA, White R, McGuirt C, et al. Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15:1395–1400. PMID: 9193331.
Article
7. Smorenburg CH, Bontenbal M, Seynaeve C, van Zuylen C, de Heus G, Verweij J, et al. Phase II study of weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing or failing both an anthracycline and a taxane. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001; 66:83–87. PMID: 11368414.
Article
8. Thomas E, Tabernero J, Fornier M, Conté P, Fumoleau P, Lluch A, et al. Phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:3399–3406. PMID: 17606975.
Article
9. Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, et al. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:7794–7803. PMID: 16172456.
Article
10. Gennari A, Conte P, Rosso R, Orlandini C, Bruzzi P. Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20-year period: a retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. Cancer. 2005; 104:1742–1750. PMID: 16149088.
11. Chia SK, Speers CH, D'yachkova Y, Kang A, Malfair-Taylor S, Barnett J, et al. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2007; 110:973–979. PMID: 17647245.
Article
12. Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, Kau SW, Yang Y, Hortobagyi GN. Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer. 2004; 100:44–52. PMID: 14692023.
Article
13. Mauri D, Polyzos NP, Salanti G, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Multiple-treatments meta-analysis of chemotherapy and targeted therapies in advanced breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100:1780–1791. PMID: 19066278.
Article
14. Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV, Poisson R, Redmond C, Margolese RG, et al. Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8:1483–1496. PMID: 2202791.
Article
15. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365:1687–1717. PMID: 15894097.
16. Bang SM, Heo DS, Lee KH, Byun JH, Chang HM, Noh DY, et al. Adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000; 89:2521–2526. PMID: 11135211.
Article
17. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 1998; 352:930–942. PMID: 9752815.
18. Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B, Fehrenbacher L, Sedlacek SM, Fisher B, et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:3686–3696. PMID: 15897552.
Article
19. Jones S, Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy J, Blum JL, Vukelja SJ, McIntyre KJ, et al. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of us oncology research trial 9735. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:1177–1183. PMID: 19204201.
Article
20. Carmichael J, Possinger K, Phillip P, Beykirch M, Kerr H, Walling J, et al. Advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial with gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13:2731–2736. PMID: 7595731.
Article
21. Rha SY, Moon YH, Jeung HC, Kim YT, Sohn JH, Yang WI, et al. Gemcitabine monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 90:215–221. PMID: 15830134.
Article
22. Vogel C, O'Rourke M, Winer E, Hochster H, Chang A, Adamkiewicz B, et al. Vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in women 60 years of age or older. Ann Oncol. 1999; 10:397–402. PMID: 10370781.
Article
23. Blum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM, Horton J, Rutman O, Buzdar A, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2001; 92:1759–1768. PMID: 11745247.
Article
24. Reichardt P, Von Minckwitz G, Thuss-Patience PC, Jonat W, Kölbl H, Jänicke F, et al. Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(")) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy. Ann Oncol. 2003; 14:1227–1233. PMID: 12881384.
Article
25. Zambetti M, Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Daidone MG, Coradini D, Bignami P, et al. Adjuvant CMF for node-negative and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992; (11):77–83. PMID: 1627434.
26. Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8:235–244. PMID: 17329194.
Article
27. Rhee J, Han SW, Oh DY, Kim JH, Im SA, Han W, et al. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of triple-negativity in node-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008; 8:307. PMID: 18947390.
Article
28. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434. PMID: 17671126.
Article
29. Paik S, Bryant J, Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Park C, Wickerham DL, et al. HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92:1991–1998. PMID: 11121461.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr