Yonsei Med J.  2008 Feb;49(1):79-83.

Use of Allograft in Skeletally Immature Patients for Calcaneal Neck Lengthening Osteotomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pedhkim@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To date, there have been no studies evaluating the usefulness of allograft as a substitute for autograft in calcaneal neck lengthening osteotomy. This retrospective study examined the results of calcaneal neck lengthening osteotomy using allograft for pathologic flatfoot deformity in children and adolescents with various neuromuscular diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 118 feet in 79 children treated surgically between Mar 2000 and July 2005 were reviewed. The mean age at the time of the operation was 9+3 years (range, 3-17 years) and follow-up averaged 15.4 months (range, 13-21 months) postoperatively. Talo-1st metatarsal angle, talo-calcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch were measured before and after operation and bony union was estimated. RESULTS: Bony union was noted at the latest follow-up and there were no postoperative complications such as reduction loss, infection, nonunion, delayed union or graft loss during the follow-up period in all but one foot. All radiographic indices were improved postoperatively in all cases. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that use of allograft in calcaneal neck lengthening osteotomy is a useful option for correction of the planovalgus deformity in skeletally immature patients whose enough autobone can not be obtained.

Keyword

Calcaneal neck lengthening osteotomy; pathologic flatfoot; allograft

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Bone Diseases/*congenital/radiography/*surgery
*Bone Lengthening
*Bone Transplantation
Calcaneus/*surgery
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Male
*Osteotomy
Transplantation, Homologous

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of both feet of 9-year-old boy (A) Preoperative radiographs (B) Immediate postoperative radiographs (C) Bony union was confirmed at the postoperative 1 year, and corrected talonavicular subluxation was noted in standing position.


Reference

1. Barry RJ, Scranton PE Jr. Flat feet in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983. 181:68–75.
Article
2. Evans D. Calcaneo-valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975. 57:270–278.
Article
3. Mosca VS. Calcaneal lengthening for valgus deformity of the hindfoot. Results in children who had severe, symptomatic flatfoot and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:500–512.
Article
4. Crego CH Jr, Ford LT. An end-result study of various operative procedures for correcting flat feet in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952. 34-A:183–195.
Article
5. Grice DS. An extra-articular arthrodesis of the subastragalar joint for correction of paralytic flat feet in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952. 34-A:927–940.
Article
6. Rathjen KE, Mubarak SJ. Calcaneal-cuboid-cuneiform osteotomy for the correction of valgus foot deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998. 18:775–782.
Article
7. Gür E, Sarlak O. The complications of Salter innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg. 1990. 56(1 Pt B):257–261.
8. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988. 70:407–415.
Article
9. Grice DS. Further experience with extra-articular arthrodesis of the subtalar joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955. 37:246–259.
Article
10. McCall RE, Lillich JS, Harris JR, Johnston FA. The Grice extraarticular subtalar arthrodesis: a clinical review. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985. 5:442–445.
Article
11. Phillips GE. A review of elongation of os calcis for flat feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983. 65:15–18.
Article
12. Anderson MJ, Keyak JH, Skinner HB. Compressive mechanical properties of human cancellous bone after gamma irradiation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992. 74:747–752.
Article
13. Glancy GL, Brugioni DJ, Eilert RE, Chang FM. Autograft versus allograft for benign lesions in children. Clin Orthop. 1991. 262:28–33.
Article
14. Hamer AJ, Stockley I, Elson RA. Changes in allograft bone irradiated at different temperatures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999. 81:342–344.
Article
15. Hamer AJ, Strachan JR, Black MM, Ibbotson CJ, Stockley I, Elson RA. Biomechanical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurements. A comparison of fresh, freshfrozen and irradiated bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996. 78-B:363–368.
16. Poumarat G, Squire P. Comparison of mechanical properties of human, bovine bone and a new processed bone xenograft. Biomaterials. 1993. 14:337–340.
Article
17. Markin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 324:86–97.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr