J Gastric Cancer.  2016 Dec;16(4):207-214. 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.4.207.

The Ratio-Based N Staging System Can More Accurately Reflect the Prognosis of T4 Gastric Cancer Patients with D2 Lymphadenectomy Compared with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging System

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. md9650@hanyang.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The utility of N classification has been questioned after the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) was published. We evaluated the correlation between ratio-based N (rN) classification with the overall survival of pathological T4 gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed 222 cases of advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2015. The T4 gastric cancer patents were classified into four groups according to the lymph node ratio (the number of metastatic lymph nodes divided by the retrieved lymph nodes): rN0, 0%; rN1, ≤13.3%; rN2, ≤40.0%; and rN3, >40.0%.
RESULTS
The rN stage showed a large down stage migration compared with pathological T4N3 (AJCC/UICC). There was a significant difference in overall survival between rN2 and rN3 groups in patients with pT4N3 (P=0.013). In contrast, the difference in metastatic lymph nodes was not significant in these patients (≥16 vs. <15; P=0.177). In addition, the rN staging system showed a more distinct difference in overall survival than the pN staging system for pathological T4 gastric cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results confirm that rN staging could be a good alternative for pathological T4 gastric cancer patients who undergo D2 lymphadenectomy. However, before applying this system to gastric cancer patients who undergo D2 lymphadenectomy, a larger sample size is required to further evaluate the usefulness of the rN staging system for all stages, including less advanced stages.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Prognosis; TNM staging

MeSH Terms

Classification
Gastrectomy
Humans
Joints*
Lymph Node Excision*
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis*
Sample Size
Stomach Neoplasms*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Survival curves of pT4pN3 gastric cancer patients according to the ratio-based N staging system (rN2 vs. rN3 groups). pT = pathologic T; pN = pathologic N; rN = ratio-based N.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Survival curves of pT4 gastric cancer patients according to the rN staging system. (B) Survival curves of pT4 gastric cancer patients according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control on Cancer staging system. pT = pathologic T; rN = ratio-based N; pN = pathologic N.


Reference

1. Tóth D, Török M, Kincses Z, Damjanovich L. Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy. Gastric Cancer. 2013; 16:201–207.
2. Mishima Y, Hirayama R. The role of lymph node surgery in gastric cancer. World J Surg. 1987; 11:406–411.
3. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:3077–3079.
4. Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, D'Amico TA, Das P, Denlinger C, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11:531–546.
5. Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:7114–7124.
6. Putchakayala K, Difronzo LA. D2 lymph node dissection improves staging in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2011; 77:1326–1329.
7. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:113–123.
8. Krijnen P, den Dulk M, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Jansen-Landheer ML, van de Velde CJ. Improved survival after resectable non-cardia gastric cancer in The Netherlands: the importance of surgical training and quality control. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35:715–720.
9. Patel MI, Rhoads KF, Ma Y, Ford JM, Visser BC, Kunz PL, et al. Seventh edition (2010) of the AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: is there room for improvement? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:1631–1638.
10. Reim D, Loos M, Vogl F, Novotny A, Schuster T, Langer R, et al. Prognostic implications of the seventh edition of the international union against cancer classification for patients with gastric cancer: the Western experience of patients treated in a single-center European institution. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:263–271.
11. Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, Ambrosi A, Mencarelli R, Belluco C, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10:1077–1085.
12. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg. 2007; 245:543–552.
13. Asoglu O, Karanlik H, Parlak M, Kecer M, Muslumanoglu M, Igci A, et al. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009; 56:908–913.
14. Lemmens VE, Dassen AE, van der Wurff AA, Coebergh JW, Bosscha K. Lymph node examination among patients with gastric cancer: variation between departments of pathology and prognostic impact of lymph node ratio. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37:488–496.
15. Wang J, Dang P, Raut CP, Pandalai PK, Maduekwe UN, Rattner DW, et al. Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database. Ann Surg. 2012; 255:478–485.
16. Wong J, Rahman S, Saeed N, Lin HY, Almhanna K, Shridhar R, et al. Prognostic impact of lymph node retrieval and ratio in gastric cancer: a U.S. single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17:2059–2066.
17. Maduekwe UN, Lauwers GY, Fernandez-Del-Castillo C, Berger DL, Ferguson CM, Rattner DW, et al. New metastatic lymph node ratio system reduces stage migration in patients undergoing D1 lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:1267–1277.
18. Lee HK, Yang HK, Kim WH, Lee KU, Choe KJ, Kim JP. Influence of the number of lymph nodes examined on staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2001; 88:1408–1412.
19. Kong SH, Lee HJ, Ahn HS, Kim JW, Kim WH, Lee KU, et al. Stage migration effect on survival in gastric cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy: the reappraisal of positive lymph node ratio as a proper N-staging. Ann Surg. 2012; 255:50–58.
20. Lee YC, Yang PJ, Zhong Y, Clancy TE, Lin MT, Wang J. Lymph node ratio-based staging system outperforms the seventh AJCC system for gastric cancer: validation analysis with national Taiwan university hospital cancer registry. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014; DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000110. [In press].
21. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:177–186.
22. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, Bonenkamp JJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Songun I, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:2069–2077.
23. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, Bancewicz J, Craven J, Joypaul V, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical co-operative group. Br J Cancer. 1999; 79:1522–1530.
24. Giuliani A, Caporale A, Corona M, Di Bari M, Demoro M, Ricciardulli T, et al. Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: influence on prognosis of lymph node count. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 23:215–224.
25. Hsu JT, Lin CJ, Sung CM, Yeh HC, Chen TH, Chen TC, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39:1287–1293.
26. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against Cancer Cancer staging manuals. Cancer. 2010; 116:3763–3773.
Full Text Links
  • JGC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr