Korean J Anesthesiol.  2017 Aug;70(4):412-419. 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.412.

Comparing epidural surgical anesthesia and spinal anesthesia following epidural labor analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. heajo7890@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The conversion of epidural labor analgesia (ELA) to epidural surgical anesthesia (ESA) for intrapartum cesarean section (CS) often fails, resulting in intraoperative pain. Spinal anesthesia (SA) can provide a denser sensory block than ESA. The purpose of this prospective, non-blinded, parallel-arm, randomized trial was to compare the rate of pain-free surgery between ESA and SA following ELA for intrapartum CS.
METHODS
Both groups received continuous epidural infusions for labor pain at a rate of 10 ml/h. In the ESA group (n = 163), ESA was performed with 17 ml of 2% lidocaine mixed with 100 µg fentanyl, 1 : 200,000 epinephrine, and 2 mEq bicarbonate. In the SA group (n = 160), SA was induced with 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 15 µg fentanyl. We investigated the failure rate of achieving pain-free surgery and the incidence of complications between the two groups.
RESULTS
The failure rate of achieving pain-free surgery was higher in the ESA group than the SA group (15.3% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the rate of conversion to general anesthesia; however, the rate of analgesic requirement was higher in the ESA group than in the SA group (12.9% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001). The incidence of high block, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and shivering and Apgar scores were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
SA after ELA can lower the failure rate of pain-free surgery during intrapartum CS compared to ESA after ELA.

Keyword

Cesarean section; Epidural anesthesia; Epidural labor analgesia; Spinal anesthesia

MeSH Terms

Analgesia*
Anesthesia*
Anesthesia, Epidural
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Spinal*
Bupivacaine
Cesarean Section*
Epinephrine
Female
Fentanyl
Hypotension
Incidence
Labor Pain
Lidocaine
Nausea
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies*
Shivering
Vomiting
Bupivacaine
Epinephrine
Fentanyl
Lidocaine

Cited by  2 articles

Let us not discard a preexisting epidural catheter for intrapartum cesarean section yet!
Anju Romina Bhalotra
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(3):244-245.    doi: 10.4097/kja.d.17.00017.

Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong: should a pre-existing epidural catheter be discarded for an intrapartum cesarean section?
Duk Kyung Kim
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70(4):373-374.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.373.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr