J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2014;11:7. 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.7.

Does curricular change improve faculty perceptions of student experiences with the educational environment? A preliminary study in an institution undergoing curricular change

• Shehnaz SI
• Sreedharan J
• Gomathi KG

• KMID: 2380926
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.7

Abstract

PURPOSE
College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, United Arab Emirates, underwent a major curriculum change from a discipline-based to an organ system-based integrated curriculum. However, it was not known how the faculty perceived the changes in the educational environment as experienced by the students. In this context, we aimed to compare the faculty perceptions of the student experiences in the discipline-based curriculum with those in the organ system-based integrated curriculum.
METHODS
The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire was modified to assess faculty perceptions of the student experiences, pilot-tested, and administered to all faculty members (n=28) involved in the discipline-based curriculum (FDC) in January 2009. In the subsequent year, data were collected from the same faculty involved in the new integrated curriculum (FIC). Collected data were transferred to Predictive Analytics Software version 18. Total, domain, and individual statement scores were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Percentage agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty were assessed by the McNemar's test for proportion.
RESULTS
The mean total DREEM score was significantly higher (P<0.001) for FIC (139/200) as compared to FDC (119/200). The FIC perceived significantly more positive student experiences with the educational environment as indicated by the domain scores and statement scores. The differences in proportions of agreement between FIC and FDC also reinforced that the FIC perceived more positive student experiences with the educational environment.
CONCLUSION
The study showed that the faculty perceived the organ system-based integrated curriculum as providing a better educational environment for the students than the discipline based curriculum.

Keyword

Curriculum; Educational environment; Medical faculty; Perceptions; Undergraduate medical education

MeSH Terms

Curriculum
Education
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Faculty, Medical
Humans
Uncertainty
United Arab Emirates
Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Mean statement scores for faculty teaching in discipline-based curriculum (FDC) and faculty teaching in integrated curriculum (FIC).

Reference

1. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001; 23:337–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590120063330.

2. Jiffry MT, McAleer S, Fernandoo S, Marasinghe RB. Using the DREEM questionnaire to gather baseline information on an evolving medical school in Sri Lanka. Med Teach. 2005; 27:348–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590500151005.

3. Mayya S, Roff S. Students’ perceptions of educational environment: a comparison of academic achievers and under-achievers at Kasturba Medical College, India. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004; 17:280–291.

4. Al-Hazimi A, Zaini R, Al-Hyiani A, Hassan N, Gunaid A, Ponnamperuma G, Karunathilake I, Roff S, McAleer s, Davis M, editors. Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: a study in four undergraduate medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004; 17:192–203.

5. Shehnaz SI, Sreedharan J. Students' perceptions of educational environment in a medical school experiencing curricular transition in United Arab Emirates. Med Teach. 2011; 33:e37–e42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.530312.

6. Shehnaz SI, Sreedharan J, Gomathi KG. Faculty and students’ perceptions of student experiences in a medical school undergoing curricular transition in the United Arab Emirates. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012; 12:77–85. http://web.squ.edu.om/squmj/archive.asp?year=2012&panelno=0.

7. Miles S, Leinster SJ. Comparing staff and student perceptions of the student experience at a new medical school. Med Teach. 2009; 31:539–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590802139732.

8. Lam TP, Khoo US, Chan YS, Cheng YH, Lam KF. The first batch of graduates of a new medical curriculum in Asia: how their teachers see them. Med Educ. 2004; 38:980–986. http://dx.doi.org 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01910.x.

9. Watson RT, Suter E, Romrell LJ, Harman EM, Rooks LG, Neims AH. Moving a graveyard: how one school prepared the way for continuous curriculum renewal. Acad Med. 1998; 73:948–955.

10. Haghdoost AA, Shakibi MR. Medical student and academic staff perceptions of role models: an analytical cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6:9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-9.

11. Riquelme A, Oporto M, Oporto J, Mendez J, Viviani P, Salech F, Chianale J, Moreno R, Sanchez I. Measuring students' perceptions of the educational climate of the new curriculum at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: performance of the Spanish translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009; 22:112.

12. Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ. 2008; 42:778–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03110.x.

13. Norcini J. The power of feedback. Med Educ. 2010; 44:16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03542.x.

14. Whittle SR, Whelan B, Murdoch-Eaton DG. DREEM and beyond; studies of the educational environment as a means for its enhancement. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2007; 20:7.

15. Seabrook M. Clinical students’ initial reports of the educational climate in a single medical school. Med Educ. 2004; 38:659–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01823.x.