J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2013;10:5.

Medical students' perception of the educational environment in a medical college in India: a cross-sectional study using the Dundee Ready Education Environment questionnaire

• Kohli V
• Dhaliwal U

Abstract

PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of the environment in this medical college using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM).
METHODS
Cross-sectional study; 348 medical student volunteers (68.1%) of all semesters participated (511 enrolled). DREEM has 50 items, each rated from 0-4 (Likert scale: 0, strongly disagree to 4, strongly agree), that measure five domains: students' perceptions of learning; perceptions of teachers; academic self-perception; perceptions of the atmosphere; and social self-perception. Mean item scores, domain scores, and global scores were computed.
RESULTS
The three highest rated items were knowledgeable teachers, having good friends, and confidence about passing; the three most problematic items were a poor support system for stressed students, inability to memorize everything, and over-emphasis on factual learning. The percentage score for perception of learning (47.26+/-14.85) was significantly lower than that for teachers (52.28+/-9.91; P<0.001); academic self-perception (52.14+/-15.21; P<0.001); perception of the atmosphere (51.21+/-13.60; P=0.001); and social self-perception (50.63+/-13.90; P=0.010). The global scores were lowest for eighth-semester students (89.8+/-21.24) when compared to second (101.33+/-21.05; P=0.003), fourth (107.69+/-18.96; P<0.001), and sixth (100.07+/-20.61; P=0.020).
CONCLUSION
Improvement is required across all domains of the educational environment at this institution. Students, particularly of the eighth semester, perceived the teaching negatively. The lowest scores were given to the support system, burdensome course content, and factual learning; thus, a hybrid curriculum that includes problem-based learning might provide students with stimulating learning; structured clinical teaching with specific curricular objectives, as well as mentoring of senior students by faculty and near-peers, might improve the learning environment for senior students.

Keyword

Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure; Educational environment; Medical student; Perception; Questionnaire

MeSH Terms

Atmosphere
Cross-Sectional Studies*
Curriculum
Education*
Friends
Humans
India*
Learning
Mentors
Problem-Based Learning
Self Concept
Students, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Veerapen K, McAleer S. Students’ perception of the learning environment in a distributed medical programme. Med Educ Online. 2010; 15:http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5168.

2. Al-Ayed IH, Sheik SA. Assessment of the educational environment at the College of Medicine of King Saud University, Riyadh. East Mediterr Health J. 2008; 14:953–959.

3. Arzuman H, Yusoff MS, Chit SP. Big Sib students’ perceptions of the educational environment at the School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, using Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) Inventory. Malays J Med Sci. 2010; 17:40–47.

4. Demiroren M, Palaoglu O, Kemahli S, Ozyurda F, Ayhan IH. Perceptions of students in different phases of medical education of educational environment:. Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Med Educ Online. 2008; 13:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00267.

5. Mojaddidi MA, Khoshhal KI, Habib F, Shalaby S, El-Bab ME, Al-Zalabani AH. Reassessment of the undergraduate educational environment in College of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2013. 35(Suppl 1):S39–S46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.765554.

6. Abraham R, Ramnarayan K, Vinod P, Torke S. Students’ perceptions of learning environment in an Indian medical School. BMC Med Educ. 2008; 8:20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-8-20.

7. Thomas BS, Abraham RR, Alexander M, Ramnarayan K. Students’ perceptions regarding educational environment in an Indian dental school. Med Teach. 2009; 31:e185–e186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590802516749.

8. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, Groenen G, Primparyon P. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach. 1997; 19:295–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421599709034208.

9. Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M. Using DREEM to compare graduating students’ perceptions of learning environments at medical schools adopting contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach. 2012; 34(Suppl 1):S25–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.656747.

10. Edgren G, Haffling AC, Jakobsson U, McAleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach. 2010; 32:e233–e238. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421591003706282.

11. Dimoliatis ID, Vasilaki E, Anastassopoulos P, Ioannidis JP, Roff S. Validation of the Greek translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010; 23:348.

12. Naser SM, Biswas A, Nandy M, Niyogi S, Biswas G, Das AK. Perception of students regarding educational environment in a medical college in eastern region of India. J Indian Med Assoc. 2012; 110:800–802. 806

13. Tokuda Y, Goto E, Otaki J, Jacobs J, Omata F, Obara H, Shapiro M, Soejima K, Ishida Y, Ohde S, Takahashi O, Fukui T. Undergraduate educational environment, perceived preparedness for postgraduate clinical training, and pass rate on the National Medical Licensure Examination in Japan. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10:35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-35.

14. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001; 23:337–344.

15. Aghamolaei T, Fazel I. Medical students’ perceptions of the educational environment at an Iranian Medical Sciences University. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10:87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-87.

16. Ramani S. Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching. Med Teach. 2008; 30:851–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590802206747.

17. Ramani S. Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Med Teach. 2003. 25:112–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000092463.

18. Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ. Impediments to bed-side teaching. Med Educ. 1998; 32:159–162.

19. Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC. A comparison between findings from the DREEM questionnaire and that from qualitative interviews. Med Teach. 2009; 31:e449–e453. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590902849552.

20. Hasan T, Gupta P. Assessing the learning environment at Jazan medical school of Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2013. 35(Suppl 1):S90–S96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.765546.

21. Unnikrishnan B, Rekha T, Mithra PP, Kumar N, Reshmi B. Perceptions of medical students about their educational environment in Community Medicine in a medical college of coastal Karnataka. Indian J Community Med. 2012; 37:130–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.96106.

22. Bhatia A, Singh N, Dhaliwal U. Mentoring for first year medical students: humanising medical education. Indian J Med Ethics. 2013; 10:100–103.