Cancer Res Treat.  2017 Apr;49(2):313-321. 10.4143/crt.2016.098.

Expression of Myxovirus Resistance A (MxA) Is Associated with Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Positive Breast Cancers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, BioMedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. ahrong2h@naver.com
  • 2Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. artinus2000@naver.com
  • 3Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been determined in breast cancers. Interferons can affect T-cell activity through direct and indirect mechanisms. Myxovirus resistance A (MxA) is an excellent marker of interferon activity. Here,we evaluated TILs and MxA expression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ninety cases of hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2+ tumors and 78 cases of HR-/HER2+ tumors were included. The TILs level was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin-stained full face sections, and MxA expressionwas evaluated by immunohistochemistrywith a tissue microarray.
RESULTS
MxA protein expression was significantly higher in tumors with high histologic grade (p=0.023) and high levels of TILs (p=0.002). High levels of TILs were correlated with high histological grade (p=0.001), negative lymphovascular invasion (p=0.007), negative lymph node metastasis (p=0.007), absence of HR expression (p < 0.001), abundant tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) around ductal carcinoma in situ (p=0.018), and abundant TLSs around the invasive component (p < 0.001). High levels of TILs were also associated with improved disease-free survival, particularly in HR-/HER2+ breast cancers. However, MxA was not a prognostic factor.
CONCLUSION
High expression of MxA in tumor cells was associated with high levels of TILs in HER2-positive breast cancers. Additionally, a high level of TILs was a prognostic factor for breast cancer, whereas the level of MxA expression had no prognostic value.

Keyword

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; Myxovirus resistance proteins; Breast neoplasms

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms
Breast*
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Disease-Free Survival
Epidermal Growth Factor*
Hematoxylin
Humans*
Interferons
Lymph Nodes
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating*
Myxovirus Resistance Proteins
Neoplasm Metastasis
Orthomyxoviridae*
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor*
T-Lymphocytes
Epidermal Growth Factor
Hematoxylin
Interferons
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Evaluation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) level by histology with hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections according to the recommendation by the International TILs Working Group and tertiary lymphoid structures. Interpreted as 50% (A, ×100) and 70% (B, ×200) of TILs and tertiary lymphoid structure (C, ×200), a lymph-node like lymphoid accumulation showing high endothelial venule (arrowheads).

  • Fig. 2. Expression of myxovirus resistance A (MxA) by immunohistochemistry: negative staining (A, ×400), weak staining (B, ×400), moderate staining (C, ×400), and strong staining (D, ×400) for MxA.

  • Fig. 3. Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) level and disease-free survival in total human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancers (A), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2+ breast cancers (B), and HR–/HER2+ breast cancers (C).


Cited by  1 articles

Expression of Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 in Breast Cancer and Its Association with Immune-Related Markers
Miseon Lee, In Hye Song, Sun-Hee Heo, Young-Ae Kim, In Ah Park, Won Seon Bang, Hye Seon Park, Gyungyub Gong, Hee Jin Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):80-89.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.500.


Reference

References

1. Ahn SG, Jeong J, Hong S, Jung WH. Current issues and clinical evidence in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015; 49:355–63.
Article
2. Stagg J, Loi S, Divisekera U, Ngiow SF, Duret H, Yagita H, et al. Anti-ErbB-2 mAb therapy requires type I and II interferons and synergizes with anti-PD-1 or anti-CD137 mAb therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:7142–7.
Article
3. Lee HJ, Kim JY, Park IA, Song IH, Yu JH, Ahn JH, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the tertiary lymphoid structures in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015; 144:278–88.
Article
4. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, et al. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26:259–71.
Article
5. Schlee M. Master sensors of pathogenic RNA: RIG-I like receptors. Immunobiology. 2013; 218:1322–35.
6. Weichselbaum RR, Ishwaran H, Yoon T, Nuyten DS, Baker SW, Khodarev N, et al. An interferon-related gene signature for DNA damage resistance is a predictive marker for chemotherapy and radiation for breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105:18490–5.
Article
7. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012; 149:274–93.
Article
8. Hu JL, Hua YJ, Chen Y, Yu B, Gao S. Structural analysis of tumor-related single amino acid mutations in human MxA protein. Chin J Cancer. 2015; 34:583–93.
Article
9. Haller O, Staeheli P, Schwemmle M, Kochs G. Mx GTPases: dynamin-like antiviral machines of innate immunity. Trends Microbiol. 2015; 23:154–63.
Article
10. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010; 140:805–20.
Article
11. Lee HJ, Kim JY, Song IH, Park IA, Yu JH, Ahn JH, et al. High mobility group B1 and N1 (HMGB1 and HMGN1) are associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HER2-positive breast cancers. Virchows Arch. 2015; 467:701–9.
Article
12. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, Foster GR, et al. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007; 6:975–90.
Article
13. Crouse J, Kalinke U, Oxenius A. Regulation of antiviral T cell responses by type I interferons. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015; 15:231–42.
Article
14. Simmons DP, Wearsch PA, Canaday DH, Meyerson HJ, Liu YC, Wang Y, et al. Type I IFN drives a distinctive dendritic cell maturation phenotype that allows continued class II MHC synthesis and antigen processing. J Immunol. 2012; 188:3116–26.
Article
15. Minn AJ. Interferons and the immunogenic effects of cancer therapy. Trends Immunol. 2015; 36:725–37.
Article
16. Calmon MF, Rodrigues RV, Kaneto CM, Moura RP, Silva SD, Mota LD, et al. Epigenetic silencing of CRABP2 and MX1 in head and neck tumors. Neoplasia. 2009; 11:1329–39.
Article
17. Mushinski JF, Nguyen P, Stevens LM, Khanna C, Lee S, Chung EJ, et al. Inhibition of tumor cell motility by the interferon-inducible GTPase MxA. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284:15206–14.
Article
18. Brown SG, Knowell AE, Hunt A, Patel D, Bhosle S, Chaudhary J. Interferon inducible antiviral MxA is inversely associated with prostate cancer and regulates cell cycle, invasion and docetaxel induced apoptosis. Prostate. 2015; 75:266–79.
Article
19. Croner RS, Sturzl M, Rau TT, Metodieva G, Geppert CI, Naschberger E, et al. Quantitative proteome profiling of lymph node-positive vs. -negative colorectal carcinomas pinpoints MX1 as a marker for lymph node metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135:2878–86.
20. Huber M, Bahr I, Kratzschmar JR, Becker A, Muller EC, Donner P, et al. Comparison of proteomic and genomic analyses of the human breast cancer cell line T47D and the antiestrogen-resistant derivative T47D-r. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004; 3:43–55.
Article
21. Becker M, Sommer A, Kratzschmar JR, Seidel H, Pohlenz HD, Fichtner I. Distinct gene expression patterns in a tamoxifen-sensitive human mammary carcinoma xenograft and its tamoxifen-resistant subline MaCa 3366/TAM. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005; 4:151–68.
22. Johansson HJ, Sanchez BC, Forshed J, Stal O, Fohlin H, Lewensohn R, et al. Proteomics profiling identify CAPS as a potential predictive marker of tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Clin Proteomics. 2015; 12:8.
Article
23. Sistigu A, Yamazaki T, Vacchelli E, Chaba K, Enot DP, Adam J, et al. Cancer cell-autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Nat Med. 2014; 20:1301–9.
Article
24. Farmer P, Bonnefoi H, Anderle P, Cameron D, Wirapati P, Becette V, et al. A stroma-related gene signature predicts resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2009; 15:68–74.
Article
25. Goc J, Germain C, Vo-Bourgais TK, Lupo A, Klein C, Knockaert S, et al. Dendritic cells in tumor-associated tertiary lymphoid structures signal a Th1 cytotoxic immune contexture and license the positive prognostic value of infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res. 2014; 74:705–15.
Article
26. Martinet L, Garrido I, Filleron T, Le Guellec S, Bellard E, Fournie JJ, et al. Human solid tumors contain high endothelial venules: association with T- and B-lymphocyte infiltration and favorable prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011; 71:5678–87.
Article
27. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012; 490:61–70.
Article
28. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17:1474–81.
Article
29. Lee HJ, Park IA, Park SY, Seo AN, Lim B, Chai Y, et al. Two histopathologically different diseases: hormone receptor-positive and hormone receptor-negative tumors in HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 145:615–23.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr