1.Conrad HJ., Seong WJ., Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 98:389–404.
Article
2.Martl′nez-Rus F., Sua′rez MJ., Rivera B., Pradl′es G. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2011. 105:108–14.
3.Patzelt SB., Lamprinos C., Stampf S., Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014. 145:542–51.
4.Cho YB., Chung CH., Kim HJ. Marginal and internal fit of copings made by CAD/CAM using different scanning methods. J Dent Rehab App Sci. 2013. 29:366–76.
Article
5.Jacobs MS., Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 65:436–42.
Article
6.Felton DA., Kanoy BE., Bayne SC., Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 65:357–64.
Article
7.Holden JE., Goldstein GR., Hittelman EL., Clark EA. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2009. 18:645–8.
Article
8.Quintas AF., Oliveira F., Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004. 92:250–7.
Article
9.Tan PL., Gratton DG., Diaz-Arnold AM., Holmes DC. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations. J Prosthodont. 2008. 17:378–83.
Article
10.Pera P., Gilodi S., Bassi F., Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994. 72:585–90.
Article
11.Kohorst P., Brinkmann H., Dittmer MP., Borchers L., Stiesch M. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2010. 37:283–91.
Article
12.Stappert CF., Dai M., Chitmongkolsuk S., Gerds T., Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems. Br Dent J. 2004. 196:766–70.
Article
13.Wolfart S., Wegner SM., Al-Halabi A., Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:587–92.
14.Balkaya MC., Cinar A., Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2005. 93:346–55.
Article
15.Fonseca JC., Henriques GE., Sobrinho LC., de Go′es MF. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium copings. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:686–91.
Article
16.Wettstein F., Sailer I., Roos M., Hämmerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008. 116:272–9.
Article
17.Gonzalo E., Sua′rez MJ., Serrano B., Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. 102:378–84.
Article
18.Valderrama S., Van Roekel N., Andersson M., Goodacre CJ., Munoz CA. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995. 8:29–37.
19.Baig MR., Tan KB., Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent. 2010. 104:216–27.
Article
20.Han HS., Yang HS., Lim HP., Park YJ. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2011. 106:191–7.
Article
21.Reich S., Wichmann M., Nkenke E., Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005. 113:174–9.
Article
22.Jesu′s Sua′rez M., Lozano JF., Paz Salido M., Martl′nez F. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2005. 18:390–1.
23.Castillo de Oyagüe R., Sa′nchez-Jorge MI., Sa′nchez Turrio′n A., Monticelli F., Toledano M., Osorio R. Influence of CAM vs. CAD/CAM scanning methods and finish line of tooth preparation in the vertical misfit of zirconia bridge structures. Am J Dent. 2009. 22:79–83.
24.Holmes JR., Bayne SC., Holland GA., Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989. 62:405–8.
Article
25.Flügge TV., Schlager S., Nelson K., Nahles S., Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. 144:471–8.
Article
26.Vojdani M., Torabi K., Farjood E., Khaledi A. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013. 14:118–29.
27.McLean JW., von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971. 131:107–11.
Article
28.Fransson B., Oilo G., Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985. 1:197–9.
Article
29.Moldovan O., Rudolph H., Quaas S., Bornemann G., Luthardt RG. Internal and external fit of CAM-made zirconia bridge frameworks-a pilot study. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 2006. 61:38–42.
30.Sakrana AA. In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013. 21:575–80.
Article
31.Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990. 64:18–24.
Article
32.Molin M., Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993. 51:201–6.
Article
33.Kokubo Y., Nagayama Y., Tsumita M., Ohkubo C., Fukushima S., Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil. 2005. 32:753–8.
Article
34.Colpani JT., Borba M., Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater. 2013. 29:174–80.
Article