Yonsei Med J.  2017 Jan;58(1):43-50. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.43.

Identificaiton of Novel Immunogenic Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7-Specific Epitopes Restricted to HLA-A*33;03 for Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jlim@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
To identify new immunogenic HLA-A*33;03-restricted epitopes from the human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E7 protein for immunotherapy against cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We synthesized fourteen overlapping 15-amino acid peptides and measured intracellular interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production in PBMC and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) after sensitization with these peptides using flow cytometry and ELISpot assay. The immunogenicity of epitopes was verified using a ⁵¹Cr release assay with SNU1299 cells.
RESULTS
Among the fourteen 15-amino acid peptides, E7₄₉₋₆₃ (RAHYNIVTFCCKCDS) demonstrated the highest IFN-γ production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and CD8+ CTLs sensitized with E7₄₉₋₆₃ showed higher cytotoxic effect against SNU1299 cells than did CD8+ CTLs sensitized with other peptides or a negative control group. Thirteen 9- or 10-amino acid overlapping peptides spanning E7₄₉₋₆₃, E7₅₀₋₅₉ (AHYNIVTFCC), and E7₅₂₋₆₁ (YNIVTFCCKC) induced significantly higher IFN-γ production and cytotoxic effects against SNU1299 cells than the other peptides and negative controls, and the cytotoxicity of E7₅₀₋₅₉- and E7₅₂₋₆₁-sensitized PBMCs was induced via the cytolytic effect of CD8+ CTLs.
CONCLUSION
We identified E7₅₀₋₅₉ and E7₅₂₋₆₁ as novel HPV 16 E7 epitopes for HLA-A*33;03. CD8+ CTL sensitized with these peptides result in an antitumor effect against cervical cancer cells. These epitopes could be useful for immune monitoring and immunotherapy for cervical cancer and HPV 16-related diseases including anal cancer and oropharyngeal cancer.

Keyword

HLA-A*33;03; HPV 16 E7; immunotherapy; cervical cancer; epitopes

MeSH Terms

Amino Acid Sequence
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology/metabolism
Epitopes/*immunology/therapeutic use
Female
*HLA-A Antigens
Human papillomavirus 16/*immunology
Humans
*Immunotherapy
Interferon-gamma/analysis/*biosynthesis
Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology/metabolism
T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology/metabolism
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*therapy
Epitopes
HLA-A Antigens
Interferon-gamma

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Quantitation of IFN-γ production and a cytotoxicity assay of candidate 15-amino acid peptide-sensitized CTLs. (A) Flow cytometry analyses were performed to measure intracellular IFN-γ production of PBMCs sensitized with candidate peptides. E749-63 induced significantly higher IFN-γ production in PBMCs from HLA-A*33;03 subjects than negative controls (non-peptide). The data are representative of ten independent experiments using PBMCs from HLA-A*33;03 subjects. (B) The bar graph depicts the numbers of each peptide-specific INF-γ+CD8+ T cells per 7.5×104 PBMCs. Columns, mean (n=10); bars, SE. (C) ELISpot assays were performed to measure IFN-γ production from CD8+ CTL that were sensitized with fourteen candidate peptides. HPV 16 E749-63 induced greater number of IFN-γ+ spots from CD8+ CTLs of HLA-A*33;03 donors than other peptides as well as negative control. The bar graph depicts the numbers of SFU of INF-γ produced by CD8+ T cells. Columns, mean (n=6); bars, SE. (D) E749-63 (▵)-sensitized PBMCs lysed a significantly higher number of SNU1299 cells than negative control in a cytotoxic assay using 51Cr release. Point, mean (n=10); bars, SE. CMV A33 (○)-sensitized PBMCs was used as a positive control and non-peptide (•) or CMV A02 (▾)-sensitized PBMCs were used as negative controls matched with each donor's HLA type. All statistically significant differences between the test group and the control group (non-peptide) were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. IFN-γ, interferon-γ; CTLs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, standard error; HPV, human papillomavirus.

  • Fig. 2 Quantitation of intracellular IFN-γ production and a cytotoxicity assay of candidate 9- or 10-amino acid peptide-sensitized CTLs. (A) E750-59 and E752-61 induced significantly higher IFN-γ production in PBMCs from HLA-A*33;03 subjects than negative controls (non-peptide). The data are representative of ten independent experiments using PBMCs from HLA-A*33;03 subjects. (B) The bar graph depicts the number of each peptide-specific INF-γ+CD8+ T cells per 7.5×104 PBMCs. Columns, mean (n=10); bars, SE. Statistically significant differences between the test group and the non-peptide group were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. (C) E750-59 (▵)- and E752-61 (▪)-sensitized PBMC lysed a significantly higher number of SNU129 cells than negative control (non-peptide, •). CMV A33 (○)-sensitized PBMCs was used as a positive control and CMV A02 (▾)-sensitized PBMCs was used as a negative control. Point, mean (n=10); bars, SE. (D) E750-59 (▾)- and E752-61 (▵)-sensitized PBMCs lysed a significantly higher number of EBV-BLCs than negative control. CMV A33 (○)-sensitized PBMCs was used as a positive control and non-peptide sensitized-PBMCs (none, •) or non-peptide pulsed-EBV-BLCs (▪, □) were used as negative controls. Point, mean (n=10); bars, SE. (E) CD69 expression by CD8+ T cells was measured by flow cytometry to determine the activation of CD8+ CTLs after a 1-week sensitization with each candidate peptide, and E750-59 and E752-61 -sensitized CD8+ CTLs expressed higher quantities of CD69 than negative control. CMV A33-sensitized CD8+ CTLs were used as a positive control and non-peptide or CMV A02-sensitized CD8+ CTLs were used as negative controls. Data are representative of four independent experiments using PBMCs from HLA-A*3303 subjects. IFN-γ, interferon-γ; CTLs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, standard error; EBV-BLCs, Epstein-Barr virus-B lymphoblastoid cells.

  • Fig. 3 HPV 16 E7 peptide-specific cytotoxicity by the cytolytic effect of CD8+ CTLs in PBMCs (A) E749-63-sensitized- and isolated-CD8+ CTLs (▪) as well as E749-63-sensitized PBMCs (○) lysed significantly greater quantities of SNU1299 cells than the CD8+ T lymphocyte-depleted PBMCs (▵) and non-peptide sensitized-PBMCs (•) used as a negative control. Point, mean (n=7); bar, SE. (B) E750-59 (▾)- and E752-61 (▵)-sensitized and isolated-CD8+ CTLs also showed significantly higher cytotoxicity against SNU1299 cells than CD8+ T lymphocyte-depleted PBMCs (▪, □) as well as the negative control (non-peptide, •). Point, mean (n=7); bar, SE. HPV, human papillomavirus; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, standard error; CTLs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes.


Reference

1. zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2:342–350.
Article
2. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:518–527.
Article
3. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002; 55:244–265.
Article
4. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:4294–4301.
Article
5. Kim JJ. Targeted human papillomavirus vaccination of men who have sex with men in the USA: a cost-effectiveness modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10:845–852.
Article
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National survey shows HPV vaccine rates trail other teen vaccines. 2011. accessed on 2011 August 25. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2011/p0825_hpv_vaccine.htm.
7. Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, Solomon D, Bratti MC, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 298:743–753.
Article
8. Cannistra SA, Niloff JM. Cancer of the uterine cervix. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1030–1038.
Article
9. Su JH, Wu A, Scotney E, Ma B, Monie A, Hung CF, et al. Immunotherapy for cervical cancer: research status and clinical potential. BioDrugs. 2010; 24:109–129.
10. van der Burg SH, Melief CJ. Therapeutic vaccination against human papilloma virus induced malignancies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011; 23:252–257.
Article
11. Jang S, Kim YT, Chung HW, Lee KR, Lim JB, Lee K. Identification of novel immunogenic human leukocyte antigen-A 2402-binding epitopes of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 for immunotherapy against human cervical cancer. Cancer. 2012; 118:2173–2183.
Article
12. Yan J, Harris K, Khan AS, Draghia-Akli R, Sewell D, Weiner DB. Cellular immunity induced by a novel HPV18 DNA vaccine encoding an E6/E7 fusion consensus protein in mice and rhesus macaques. Vaccine. 2008; 26:5210–5215.
Article
13. Ressing ME, Sette A, Brandt RM, Ruppert J, Wentworth PA, Hartman M, et al. Human CTL epitopes encoded by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 identified through in vivo and in vitro immunogenicity studies of HLA-A*0201-binding peptides. J Immunol. 1995; 154:5934–5943.
14. Clayton J, Lonjou C. Allele and Haplotype frequencies for HLA loci in various ethnic groups. In : Charron D, editor. Genetic diversity of HLA. Functional and medical implications. Paris: EDK;1997. p. 665–820.
15. Lim JB, Kim HO, Jeong SH, Ha JE, Jang S, Lee SG, et al. Identification of HLA-A*2402-restricted HCMV immediate early-1 (IE-1) epitopes as targets for CD8+ HCMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Transl Med. 2009; 7:72.
Article
16. Rauser G, Einsele H, Sinzger C, Wernet D, Kuntz G, Assenmacher M, et al. Rapid generation of combined CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell lines for adoptive transfer into recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants. Blood. 2004; 103:3565–3572.
Article
17. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61:69–90.
Article
18. Schorge JO, Molpus KL, Koelliker D, Nikrui N, Goodman A, Fuller AF Jr. Stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with negative lymph nodes: the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 66:31–35.
Article
19. Bonomi P, Blessing J, Ball H, Hanjani P, DiSaia PJ. A phase II evaluation of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1989; 34:357–359.
Article
20. Øvestad IT, Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Malpica A, Kruse AJ, Janssen EA, et al. Local immune response in the microenvironment of CIN2-3 with and without spontaneous regression. Mod Pathol. 2010; 23:1231–1240.
Article
21. Jung AC, Guihard S, Krugell S, Ledrappier S, Brochot A, Dalstein V, et al. CD8-alpha T-cell infiltration in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma correlates with improved patient prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2013; 132:E26–E36.
Article
22. Kubo RT, Sette A, Grey HM, Appella E, Sakaguchi K, Zhu NZ, et al. Definition of specific peptide motifs for four major HLA-A alleles. J Immunol. 1994; 152:3913–3924.
23. Jochmus I, Osen W, Altmann A, Buck G, Hofmann B, Schneider A, et al. Specificity of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes induced by a human papillomavirus type 16 E7-derived peptide. J Gen Virol. 1997; 78(Pt 7):1689–1695.
Article
24. Steller MA, Gurski KJ, Murakami M, Daniel RW, Shah KV, Celis E, et al. Cell-mediated immunological responses in cervical and vaginal cancer patients immunized with a lipidated epitope of human papillomavirus type 16 E7. Clin Cancer Res. 1998; 4:2103–2109.
25. Vici P, Pizzuti L, Mariani L, Zampa G, Santini D, Di Lauro L, et al. Targeting immune response with therapeutic vaccines in premalignant lesions and cervical cancer: hope or reality from clinical studies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016; 15:1327–1336.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr