Yonsei Med J.  2016 Jul;57(4):905-914. 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.905.

Assessment of Denosumab in Korean Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 6Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Family Medicine, Cheil General Hospital, College of Medicine, Kwandong University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
  • 9GlaxoSmithKline, Seoul, Korea.
  • 10GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA. barbara.g.kravitz@gsk.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
The efficacy and safety of denosumab was compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in this phase III study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Women aged 60 to 90 years with a T-score of <-2.5 and ≥-4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized to a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab or placebo for the 6-month double-blind phase. Eligible subjects entered the 6-month open-label extension phase and received a single dose of denosumab 60 mg.
RESULTS
Baseline demographics were similar in the 62 denosumab- and 64 placebo-treated subjects who completed the double-blind phase. Treatment favored denosumab over placebo for the primary endpoint {mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at Month 6 [3.2% (95% confidence interval 2.1%, 4.4%; p<0.0001)]}; and secondary endpoints (mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Month 1, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD at Months 1 and 6, and median percent change from baseline in bone turnover markers at Months 1, 3, and 6). Endpoint improvements were sustained over 12 months in the open-label extension (n=119). There were no new or unexpected safety signals.
CONCLUSION
Denosumab was well tolerated and effective in increasing BMD and decreasing bone turnover markers over a 12-month period in Korean postmenopausal women. The findings of this study demonstrate that denosumab has beneficial effects on the measures of osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women.

Keyword

Denosumab; postmenopausal osteoporosis; Korea; bone mineral density; biochemical markers of bone turnover

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
*Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Bone Density
Bone Density Conservation Agents/*therapeutic use
Denosumab/*therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Female
Femur
Femur Neck
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy/*ethnology
Postmenopause
Republic of Korea
Bone Density Conservation Agents
Denosumab

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study design. SC, subcutaneous.

  • Fig. 2 Subject disposition. *Some subjects had more than 1 reason for failing screening.

  • Fig. 3 Primary endpoint - Mean percent change from baseline in BMD in lumbar spine. BMD measurements consisted of last observation carried forward (LOCF) values. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals for the mean percent change from baseline BMD at the lumbar spine (unadjusted). Baseline for the placebo → denosumab group is the end of double-blind phase. BMD, bone mineral density.

  • Fig. 4 Secondary endpoints - mean/median percent change from baseline in BMD in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter and in bone turnover markers, s-CTX and s-PINP. BMD measurements consisted of last observation carried forward (LOCF) values, and bone turnover marker measurements consisted of observed values. Error bars for BMD endpoints are 95% confidence intervals for the mean percent change from baseline BMD. Error bars for bone turnover markers are (Q1, Q3). Baseline for the placebo → denosumab group is the end of double-blind phase. BMD, bone mineral density; s-CTX, serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; s-PINP, serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide.


Cited by  2 articles

Pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis
Yong-Ki Min
J Korean Med Assoc. 2016;59(11):847-856.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2016.59.11.847.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Denosumab in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective, Observational Study in South Korea
Yumie Rhee, Dong-Gune Chang, Jeonghoon Ha, Sooa Kim, Yusun Lee, Euna Jo, Jung-Min Koh
Endocrinol Metab. 2022;37(3):497-505.    doi: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1427.


Reference

1. Choi YJ, Oh HJ, Kim DJ, Lee Y, Chung YS. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Korean adults aged 50 years or older and the higher diagnosis rates in women who were beneficiaries of a national screening program: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2009. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27:1879–1886.
Article
2. Kim JW, Jeon YJ, Baek DH, Kim TN, Chang JS. Percentage of the population at high risk of osteoporotic fracture in South Korea: analysis of the 2010 Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination survey data. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25:1313–1319.
Article
3. Mithal A, Ebeling P, Kyer CS. The Asia-pacific regional audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2013s. International Osteoporosis Foundation;accessed on 2014 January 23. Available at: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/sites/default/files/media/PDFs/Regional%20Audits/2013-Asia_Pacific_Audit_0_0.pdf.
4. Kostenuik PJ. Osteoprotegerin and RANKL regulate bone resorption, density, geometry and strength. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005; 5:618–625.
Article
5. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:756–765.
Article
6. Papapoulos S, Chapurlat R, Libanati C, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwiński E, et al. Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27:694–701.
Article
7. Bone HG, Chapurlat R, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, et al. The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98:4483–4492.
Article
8. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:1434–1441.
Article
9. Orwoll E, Ettinger M, Weiss S, Miller P, Kendler D, Graham J, et al. Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:604–610.
Article
10. World Health Organization. WHO scientific group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level: summary meeting report; Brussels, Belgium, 5-7 May 2004. accessed on 2013 December 9. Available at: http://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf.
11. Pitale S, Thomas M, Rathi G, Deshmukh V, Kumar P, Reddy S, et al. Effects of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from India (abstract). Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 17:Suppl1. S373–S394.
12. Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Shiraki M. Dose-response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23:1131–1140.
Article
13. Chesnut CH 3rd, Silverman S, Andriano K, Genant H, Gimona A, Harris S, et al. A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group. Am J Med. 2000; 109:267–276.
Article
14. Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Krall EA, Dallal GE. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:670–676.
Article
15. Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Hosoi T, Miki T, Gorai I, et al. Clinical Trials Express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99:2599–2607.
Article
16. Lim SK, Kung AW, Sompongse S, Soontrapa S, Tsai KS. Vitamin D inadequacy in postmenopausal women in Eastern Asia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24:99–106.
Article
17. Delmas PD. Markers of bone turnover for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis with antiresorptive drugs. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11:Suppl 6. S66–S76.
Article
18. Iwamoto J, Takeda T, Sato Y, Uzawa M. Determinants of one-year response of lumbar bone mineral density to alendronate treatment in elderly Japanese women with osteoporosis. Yonsei Med J. 2004; 45:676–682.
Article
19. Lau EMC, Sambrook P, Seeman E, Leong KH, Leung PC, Delmas P. Guidelines for diagnosing, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Asia. APLAR J Rheumatol. 2006; 9:24–36.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr