Ann Lab Med.  2016 Sep;36(5):457-462. 10.3343/alm.2016.36.5.457.

Comparative Evaluation of Three Homogenization Methods for Isolating Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nucleic Acids From Sputum Samples for Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. sung@amc.seoul.kr mnkim@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Laboratory Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) of sputum samples is commonly used to diagnose Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. Owing to the difficulty of extracting RNA from sputum containing mucus, sputum homogenization is desirable prior to nucleic acid isolation. We determined optimal homogenization methods for isolating viral nucleic acids from sputum.
METHODS
We evaluated the following three sputum-homogenization methods: proteinase K and DNase I (PK-DNase) treatment, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) treatment, and N-acetyl-L-cysteine and sodium citrate (NALC) treatment. Sputum samples were spiked with inactivated MERS-CoV culture isolates. RNA was extracted from pretreated, spiked samples using the easyMAG system (bioMérieux, France). Extracted RNAs were then subjected to rRT-PCR for MERS-CoV diagnosis (DiaPlex Q MERS-coronavirus, SolGent, Korea).
RESULTS
While analyzing 15 spiked sputum samples prepared in technical duplicate, false-negative results were obtained with five (16.7%) and four samples (13.3%), respectively, by using the PBS and NALC methods. The range of threshold cycle (Ct) values observed when detecting upE in sputum samples was 31.1-35.4 with the PK-DNase method, 34.7-39.0 with the PBS method, and 33.9-38.6 with the NALC method. Compared with the control, which were prepared by adding a one-tenth volume of 1:1,000 diluted viral culture to PBS solution, the ranges of Ct values obtained by the PBS and NALC methods differed significantly from the mean control Ct of 33.2 (both P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
The PK-DNase method is suitable for homogenizing sputum samples prior to RNA extraction.

Keyword

MERS coronavirus; Sputum; Homogenization; Nucleic acid extraction; Comparison; Proteinase K; DNase

MeSH Terms

Acetylcysteine/chemistry
Citrates/chemistry
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis
Deoxyribonuclease I/metabolism
Endopeptidase K/metabolism
Humans
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/genetics/*isolation & purification
RNA, Viral/analysis/*isolation & purification/metabolism
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sputum/*virology
Acetylcysteine
Citrates
Deoxyribonuclease I
Endopeptidase K
RNA, Viral

Cited by  2 articles

COVID-19 Molecular Testing in Korea: Practical Essentials and Answers From Experts Based on Experiences of Emergency Use Authorization Assays
Heungsup Sung, Kyoung Ho Roh, Ki Ho Hong, Moon-Woo Seong, Namhee Ryoo, Hyun Soo Kim, Jaehyeon Lee, So Yeon Kim, Sookwon Yoo, Mi-Na Kim, Myung Guk Han, Sang Won Lee, Hyukmin Lee, Cheon Kwon Yoo
Ann Lab Med. 2020;40(6):439-447.    doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.6.439.

Quality of Ribonucleic Acid Extraction for Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) of SARS-CoV-2: Importance of Internal Control Monitoring
Yeon Joo Lee, Youngeun Lim, Kyu Wha Hur, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim
Ann Lab Med. 2020;40(6):490-492.    doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.6.490.


Reference

1. Lee JH, Lee CS, Lee HB. An appropriate lower respiratory tract sample is essential for diagnosis of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1207–1208. PMID: 26240502.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens from patients under investigation (PUIs) for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)-Version 2.1. Updated on Jun 2015. http://www.cdc.gov.coronavirus/mers/downloads/guidelines-clinical-specimens.pdf.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). Last visited on 6 Jul 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/interim-guidance.html.
4. Wilson D, Yen-Lieberman B, Reischl U, Warshawsky I, Procop GW. Comparison of five methods for extraction of Legionella pneumophila from respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:5913–5916. PMID: 15583339.
5. Guery B, Poissy J, el Mansouf L, Séjourné C, Ettahar N, Lemaire X, et al. MERS-CoV study group. Clinical features and viral diagnosis of two cases of infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus: a report of nosocomial transmission. Lancet. 2013; 381:2265–2272. PMID: 23727167.
6. Kapoor M, Pringle K, Kumar A, Dearth S, Liu L, Lovchik J, et al. Clinical and laboratory findings of the first imported case of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus to the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59:1511–1518. PMID: 25100864.
7. Drosten C, Seilmaier M, Corman VM, Hartmann W, Scheible G, Sack S, et al. Clinical features and virological analysis of a case of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13:745–751. PMID: 23782859.
8. Memish ZA, Al-Tawfiq JA, Makhdoom HQ, Assiri A, Alhakeem RF, Albarrak A, et al. Respiratory tract samples, viral load, and genome fraction yield in patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome. J Infect Dis. 2014; 210:1590–1594. PMID: 24837403.
9. Murray PR. Microscopic and bacteriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975; 50:339–344. PMID: 1127999.
10. Kim HK, Oh SH, Yun KA, Sung H, Kim MN. Comparison of Anyplex II RV16 with the xTAG respiratory viral panel and Seeplex RV15 for detection of respiratory viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51:1137–1141. PMID: 23363824.
11. Sweeney PJ, Walker JM. Proteinase K (EC 3.4.21.14). In : Burrell MM, editor. Methods in molecular biology, Vol. 16. Enzymes of molecular biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press;1993. p. 305–311.
12. Breitbart B, Rohwer F. Method for discovering novel DNA viruses in blood using viral particle selection and shotgun sequencing. Biotechniques. 2005; 39:729–736. PMID: 16312220.
13. Desjardin LE, Perkins MD, Teixeira L, Cave MD, Eisenach KD. Alkaline decontamination of sputum specimens adversely affects stability of mycobacterial mRNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34:2435–2439. PMID: 8880495.
14. Erin EM, Jenkins GR, Kon OM, Zacharasiewicz AS, Nicholson GC, Neighbour H, et al. Optimized dialysis and protease inhibition of sputum dithiothreitol supernatants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 177:132–141. PMID: 17962642.
15. Grebski E, Peterson C, Medici TC. Effect of physical and chemical methods of homogenization on inflammatory mediators in sputum of asthma patients. Chest. 2001; 119:1521–1525. PMID: 11348963.
16. Zumla A, Hui DS, Perlman S. Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2015; 386:995–1007. PMID: 26049252.
17. Assiri A, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Rabeeah AA, Al-Rabiah FA, Al-Hajjar S, Al-Barrak A, et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13:752–761. PMID: 23891402.
18. Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Mller MA, Dijkman R, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature. 2013; 495:251–254. PMID: 23486063.
19. Poissy J, Goffard A, Parmentier-Decrucq E, Favory R, Kauv M, Kipnis E, et al. MERS-CoV Biology Group. Kinetics and pattern of viral excretion in biological specimens of two MERS-CoV cases. J Clin Virol. 2014; 61:275–278. PMID: 25073585.
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr