Restor Dent Endod.  2017 Feb;42(1):54-59. 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.54.

Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science, Cheonan, Korea. donyshin@dankook.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of urushiol against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) to that of NaOCl.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The canals of thirty two single rooted human teeth were instrumented with Ni-Ti files (ProTaper Next X1, X2, X3, Dentsply). A pure culture of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was prepared in sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth. The teeth were submerged in the suspension of E. faecalis and were incubated at 37℃ for 7 days to allow biofilm formation. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups according to the irrigant used, and a negative control group where no irrigant was used (n = 8). Group 1 used physiologic normal saline, group 2 used 6% NaOCl, and group 3 used 10 wt% urushiol solution. After canal irrigation, each sample was collected by the sequential placement of 2 sterile paper points (ProTaper NEXT paper points, size X3, Dentsply). Ten-fold serial dilutions on each vials, and 100 µL were cultured on a BHI agar plate for 8 hours, and colony forming unit (CFU) analysis was done. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-whitney U tests.
RESULTS
Saline group exhibited no difference in the CFU counts with control group, while NaOCl and urushiol groups showed significantly less CFU counts than saline and control groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The result of this study suggests 10% urushiol and 6% NaOCl solution had powerful antibacterial activity against E. faecalis when they were used as root canal irrigants.

Keyword

Antibacterial effect; Enterococcus faecalis; Root canal irrigant; Sodium hypochlorite; Urushiol

MeSH Terms

Agar
Biofilms
Brain
Dental Pulp Cavity*
Enterococcus faecalis
Heart
Humans
Root Canal Irrigants
Sodium Hypochlorite
Stem Cells
Tooth
Agar
Root Canal Irrigants
Sodium Hypochlorite

Reference

1. Svensäter G, Bergenholtz G. Biofilms in endodontic infections. Endod Topics. 2004; 9:27–36.
Article
2. Wolcott R, Dowd S. The role of biofilms: are we hitting the right target? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:Supplment 1. 28S–35S.
Article
3. Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the final irrigation regimen. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:663–672.
Article
4. Siqueira JF Jr, de Uzeda M. Disinfection by calcium hydroxide pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obligate and one facultative anaerobic bacteria. J Endod. 1996; 22:674–676.
Article
5. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:1–11.
Article
6. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32:93–98.
Article
7. Lee LW, Lan WH, Wang GY. A evaluation of chlorhexidine as an endosonic irrigan. J Formos Med Assoc. 1990; 89:491–497.
8. Mathew J, Emil J, Paulaian B, John B, Raja J, Mathew J. Viability and antibacterial efficacy of four root canal disinfection techniques evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17:444–448.
Article
9. Haapasalo M, Udnaes T, Endal U. Persistent, recurrent, and acquired infection of the root canal system posttreatment. Endod Topics. 2003; 6:29–56.
Article
10. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005; 10:77–102.
Article
11. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod. 1999; 25:167–171.
Article
12. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006; 32:389–398.
Article
13. Agrawal V, Rao MR, Dhingra K, Gopal VR, Mohapatra A, Mohapatra A. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of three root canal irrigants - BioPure MTAD, 2% CHX gluconate and 5.25% NaOCl as a final rinse against E. faecalis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14:842–847.
14. Fouad AF. The microbial challenge to pulp regeneration. Adv Dent Res. 2011; 23:285–289.
Article
15. Kim MJ, Choi YH, Kim WG, Kwak SS. Antioxidative activity of urushiol derivatives from the sap of lacquer tree (Rhus vernicifera Stokes). Korean J plant Resour. 1997; 10:227–230.
16. Jeong SY, Kim DW, Seo JC. Preparation and the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of urushiol powders (YPUOH). Prog Org Coat. 2014; 77:981–987.
Article
17. Cha HS, Shin DH. Antibacterial capacity of cavity disinfectants against Streptococcus mutans and their effects on shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35:147–152.
Article
18. Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Clewell DB. Prevalence, phenotype, and genotype of oral Enterococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004; 19:95–101.
Article
19. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod. 2004; 30:315–320.
20. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlén G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1998; 31:1–7.
Article
21. Hancock HH 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J. Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91:579–586.
Article
22. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Gadê-Neto CR, Sousa EL, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA, Texeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004; 19:71–76.
Article
23. Portenier I, Walrimo TMT, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis - the root canal survivor and ‘star’ in posttreatment disease. Endod Topics. 2003; 6:135–159.
Article
24. Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Appelbe OK. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2005; 38:735–742.
Article
25. Hubble TS, Hatton JF, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE, Gillespie MJ. Influence of Enteroccocus faecalis proteases and the collagen-binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2003; 18:121–126.
Article
26. Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis: a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. 2001; 34:399–405.
27. Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod. 2002; 28:689–693.
Article
28. Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls. J Endod. 1984; 10:477–483.
Article
29. Haapasalo HK, Sirén EK, Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo MP. Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2000; 33:126–131.
Article
30. Morgental RD, Singh A, Sappal H, Kopper PM, Vier-Pelisser FV, Peters OA. Dentin inhibits the antibacterial effect of new and conventional endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 2013; 39:406–410.
Article
31. Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Loiola LE, Morgental RD, Leonardo R de T, Tanomaru-Filho M. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Braz Dent J. 2013; 24:21–24.
Article
32. Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Chávez-Andrade GM, de Faria-Júnior NB, Watanabe E, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on Enterococcus faecalis from root canals: an ex vivo study. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26:342–346.
Article
33. Vatkar NA, Hedge V, Sathe S. Vitality of Enterococcus faecalis inside dentinal tubules after five root canal disinfection methods. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19:445–449.
Article
34. Dychdala GR. Chlorine and chlorine compounds. In : Block SS, editor. Disinfection, sterilization and prevention. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger;1991. p. 133–135.
35. Mohammadi Z, Shahriari S. Residual antibacterial activity of CHX and MTAD in human root dentin in vitro. J Oral Sci. 2008; 50:63–67.
Article
36. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008; 34:1291–1301.e3.
Article
37. Suk KT, Kim HS, Kim MY, Kim JW, Uh Y, Jang IH, Kim SK, Choi EH, Kim MJ, Joo JS, Baik SK. In vitro antibacterial and morphological effects of the urushiol component of the sap of the Korean lacquer tree (Rhus vernicifera Stokes) on Helicobacter pylori. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:399–404.
Article
38. Vivan RR, Bortolo MV, Duarte MA, Moraes IG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bramante CM. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris removal. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21:305–309.
Article
39. Misuriya A, Bhardwaj A, Bhardwaj A, Aggrawal S, Kumar PP, Gajjarepu S. A Comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15:153–160.
Article
40. Shen Y, Qian W, Chung C, Olsen I, Haapasalo M. Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three dimensional quantitative analysis. J Endod. 2009; 35:981–985.
Article
41. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54:291–312.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr