Yonsei Med J.  2015 Jul;56(4):1114-1121. 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1114.

The Effects of Oral Atenolol or Enalapril Premedication on Blood Loss and Hypotensive Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sjbai1@yuhs.ac
  • 2Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of premedication with oral atenolol or enalapril, in combination with remifentanil under sevoflurane anesthesia, on intraoperative blood loss by achieving adequate deliberate hypotension (DH) during orthognathic surgery. Furthermore, we investigated the impact thereof on the amount of nitroglycerin (NTG) administered as an adjuvant agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventy-three patients undergoing orthognathic surgery were randomly allocated into one of three groups: an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group (Group A, n=24) with enalapril 10 mg, a beta blocker group (Group B, n=24) with atenolol 25 mg, or a control group (Group C, n=25) with placebo. All patients were premedicated orally 1 h before the induction of anesthesia. NTG was the only adjuvant agent used to achieve DH when mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was not controlled, despite the administration of the maximum remifentanil dose (0.3 microg kg-1min-1) with sevoflurane.
RESULTS
Seventy-two patients completed the study. Blood loss was significantly reduced in Group A, compared to Group C (adjusted p=0.045). Over the target range of MAP percentage during DH was significantly higher in Group C than in Groups A and B (adjusted p-values=0.007 and 0.006, respectively). The total amount of NTG administered was significantly less in Group A than Group C (adjusted p=0.015).
CONCLUSION
Premedication with enalapril (10 mg) combined with remifentanil under sevoflurane anesthesia attenuated blood loss and achieved satisfactory DH during orthognathic surgery. Furthermore, the amount of NTG was reduced during the surgery.

Keyword

Atenolol; enalapril; premedication; blood loss; surgical; orthognathic surgery

MeSH Terms

Administration, Oral
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage/*pharmacology
Adult
Aged
*Anesthesia, Inhalation
Atenolol/administration & dosage/*pharmacology
Blood Loss, Surgical
Blood Pressure/drug effects
Cardiac Output/drug effects
Double-Blind Method
Enalapril/administration & dosage/*pharmacology
Female
Heart Rate/drug effects
Humans
Intraoperative Care
Male
Methyl Ethers/*administration & dosage
Middle Aged
*Orthognathic Surgical Procedures
Piperidines/*administration & dosage
*Premedication
Treatment Outcome
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Atenolol
Enalapril
Methyl Ethers
Piperidines

Figure

  • Fig. 1 CONSORT flow diagram. Group A, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group; Group B, β-blocker group; Group C, control group.

  • Fig. 2 Mean arterial blood pressures (MAP) in Group A, B, and C at each time point, as described in Table 1. Significant differences over time in MAP were observed among the three groups following analysis using a linear mixed model. The results of Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons for repeated measures indicated a pattern of significant difference in MAP at T1 between Group A and C (adjusted p=0.0561). In addition, MAP at T1 was statistically lower in Group B than Group C (adjusted p<0.001) and MAP at T7 was significantly higher in Group C than Group A (adjusted p<0.001). Group A, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group; Group B, β-blocker group; Group C, control group. *,‡Adjusted p<0.05, †Adjusted p<0.1.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Heart rate (HR) and (B) cardiac index (CI) in Groups A, B, and C at each time point, as shown in Table 1. Analysis using a linear mixed model indicated significant overall differences among the three groups, regardless of time. After post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction, the HR of Group B was significantly lower than that of Group C (adjusted p=0.0213). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in CI among the three groups at any of the time points analyzed. Group A, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group; Group B, β-blocker group; Group C, control group. *Adjusted p<0.05.


Reference

1. Carlos E, Monnazzi MS, Castiglia YM, Gabrielli MF, Passeri LA, Guimarães NC. Orthognathic surgery with or without induced hypotension. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43:577–580.
Article
2. Praveen K, Narayanan V, Muthusekhar MR, Baig MF. Hypotensive anaesthesia and blood loss in orthognathic surgery: a clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 39:138–140.
Article
3. Consensus conference. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion. JAMA. 1988; 260:2700–2703.
4. Rohling RG, Zimmermann AP, Biro P, Haers PE, Sailer HF. Alternative methods for reduction of blood loss during elective orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999; 14:77–82.
5. Enderby GE. A report on mortality and morbidity following 9,107 hypotensive anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 1961; 33:109–113.
Article
6. Degoute CS. Controlled hypotension: a guide to drug choice. Drugs. 2007; 67:1053–1076.
7. Testa LD, Tobias JD. Pharmacologic drugs for controlled hypotension. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7:326–337.
Article
8. Apipan B, Rummasak D. Efficacy and safety of oral propranolol premedication to reduce reflex tachycardia during hypotensive anesthesia with sodium nitroprusside in orthognathic surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:120–124.
Article
9. Boezaart AP, van der Merwe J, Coetzee A. Comparison of sodium nitroprusside- and esmolol-induced controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(5 Pt 1):373–376.
Article
10. He YM, Feng L, Huo DM, Yang ZH, Liao YH. Enalapril versus losartan for adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrology (Carlton). 2013; 18:605–614.
Article
11. Amr YM, Amin SM. Effects of preoperative β-blocker on blood loss and blood transfusion during spinal surgeries with sodium nitroprusside-controlled hypotension. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012; 6:263–267.
Article
12. Petrozza PH. Induced hypotension. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1990; 28:223–229.
Article
13. Lessard MR, Trépanier CA, Baribault JP, Brochu JG, Brousseau CA, Coté JJ, et al. Isoflurane-induced hypotension in orthognathic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69:379–383.
Article
14. Choi WS, Samman N. Risks and benefits of deliberate hypotension in anaesthesia: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37:687–703.
Article
15. Precious DS, Splinter W, Bosco D. Induced hypotensive anesthesia for adolescent orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54:680–683.
Article
16. Schaberg SJ, Kelly JF, Terry BC, Posner MA, Anderson EF. Blood loss and hypotensive anesthesia in oral-facial corrective surgery. J Oral Surg. 1976; 34:147–156.
Article
17. Shin S, Lee JW, Kim SH, Jung YS, Oh YJ. Heart rate variability dynamics during controlled hypotension with nicardipine, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014; 58:168–176.
Article
18. Yoshikawa F, Kohase H, Umino M, Fukayama H. Blood loss and endocrine responses in hypotensive anaesthesia with sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin for mandibular osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38:1159–1164.
Article
19. Marshall WK, Bedford RF, Arnold WP, Miller ED, Longnecker DE, Sussman MD, et al. Effects of propranolol on the cardiovascular and renin-angiotensin systems during hypotension produced by sodium nitroprusside in humans. Anesthesiology. 1981; 55:277–280.
Article
20. Nair S, Collins M, Hung P, Rees G, Close D, Wormald PJ. The effect of beta-blocker premedication on the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114:1042–1046.
Article
21. Tohmo H, Karanko M, Scheinin M, Viinamäki O, Salonen M, Nieminen V. Enalapril premedication attenuates the blood pressure response to tracheal intubation and stabilizes postoperative blood pressure after controlled hypotension with sodium nitroprusside in neurovascular patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1993; 5:13–21.
Article
22. Gerson JI, Allen FB, Seltzer JL, Parker FB Jr, Markowitz AH. Arterial and venous dilation by nitroprusside and nitroglycerin--is there a difference? Anesth Analg. 1982; 61:256–260.
Article
23. Yaster M, Simmons RS, Tolo VT, Pepple JM, Wetzel RC, Rogers MC. A comparison of nitroglycerin and nitroprusside for inducing hypotension in children: a double-blind study. Anesthesiology. 1986; 65:175–179.
Article
24. Herrick AL, Waller PC, Berkin KE, Pringle SD, Callender JS, Robertson MP, et al. Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension. Am J Med. 1989; 86:421–426.
Article
25. Kraiczi H, Hedner J, Peker Y, Grote L. Comparison of atenolol, amlodipine, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan for antihypertensive treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161:1423–1428.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr