J Breast Cancer.  2016 Dec;19(4):341-348. 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.341.

Role of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. wcpark@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

Historically, endocrine therapy for breast cancer began with ovarian ablation (OA) for the treatment of premenopausal patients. After the identification of estrogen receptors and the development of many antiestrogens, tamoxifen has been approved and used as the standard endocrine therapy for hormonal receptor (HR)-positive premenopausal patients to date. With the development of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, the paradigm of endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with HR-positive breast cancer began to change from OA to ovarian function suppression (OFS). To date, the indication for OFS was limited to those premenopausal patients with HR-positive breast cancer who were unable to use tamoxifen as the primary adjuvant endocrine therapy. However, following the definitive demonstration of the therapeutic role of OFS added to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor after chemotherapy in large randomized trials, such as Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial or Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial, the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for the use of endocrine therapy in premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer were recently updated to recommend OFS in high-risk patients who required adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, the role of OFS to protect ovarian function during chemotherapy in premenopausal women has remained controversial, and some evidence showing the protective effect of OFS on the ovaries during chemotherapy as well as its therapeutic effect for breast cancer in premenopausal women with HR-negative breast cancer was recently published. Further evaluation is necessary to determine its exact role. In conclusion, the role of OA or OFS has been evolving, not only to improve the efficacy of breast cancer treatment, but also to preserve ovary function. OFS remains a main strategy for premenopausal women with HR-positive early breast cancer, though its exact role should be determined in further studies.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Function; Ovary; Premenopause

MeSH Terms

Aromatase
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Drug Therapy
Estrogen Receptor Modulators
Female
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Humans
Medical Oncology
Ovary
Premenopause
Receptors, Estrogen
Tamoxifen
Aromatase
Estrogen Receptor Modulators
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Receptors, Estrogen
Tamoxifen

Reference

1. Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, Buchholz TA, Davidson NE, Gelmon KE, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice guideline update on ovarian suppression. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1689–1701. PMID: 26884586.
Article
2. Singh G. Oophorectomy in breast cancer-controversies and current status. Indian J Surg. 2012; 74:210–212. PMID: 23730045.
Article
3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Ovarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1996; 348:1189–1196. PMID: 8898035.
4. Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Láng I, Ciruelos E, Bellet M, et al. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:436–446. PMID: 25495490.
Article
5. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Láng I, et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:107–118. PMID: 24881463.
Article
6. Moore HC, Unger JM, Phillips KA, Boyle F, Hitre E, Porter D, et al. Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:923–932. PMID: 25738668.
Article
7. Beatson GT. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment, with illustrative cases. Lancet. 1896; 148:104–107.
Article
8. Beatson GT. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment, with illustrative cases. Lancet. 1896; 148:162–165.
Article
9. Love RR, Philips J. Oophorectomy for breast cancer: history revisited. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94:1433–1434. PMID: 12359852.
Article
10. Boyd S. On oöphorectomy in the treatment of cancer. Br Med J. 1897; 2:890–896.
11. Boyd S. On oophorectomy in cancer of the breast. BMJ. 1900; 2:1161–1167.
12. Huggins C, Dao TL. Adrenalectomy and oophorectomy in treatment of advanced carcinoma of the breast. J Am Med Assoc. 1953; 151:1388–1394. PMID: 13034482.
13. Mueller MD, Dreher E, Eggimann T, Linder H, Altermatt H, Hänggi W. Is laparoscopic oophorectomy rational in patients with breast cancer? Surg Endosc. 1998; 12:1390–1392. PMID: 9822463.
Article
14. Ahlbom H. Castration by roentgen rays as an auxiliary treatment in the radiotherapy of cancer Mammae at Radiumhemmet, Stockholm. Acta Radiol. 1930; 11:614–635.
Article
15. Lees AW, Giuffre C, Burns PE, Hurlburt ME, Jenkins HJ. Oophorectomy versus radiation ablation of ovarian function in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980; 151:721–724. PMID: 7444722.
Article
16. Dees EC, Davidson NE. Ovarian ablation as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2001; 28:322–331. PMID: 11498826.
Article
17. Bese NS, Iribas A, Dirican A, Oksuz D, Atkovar G, Ober A. Ovarian ablation by radiation therapy: is it still an option for the ablation of ovarian function in endocrine responsive premenopausal breast cancer patients? Breast. 2009; 18:304–308. PMID: 19800233.
Article
18. Davidson NE. Ovarian ablation as treatment for young women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994; (16):95–99. PMID: 7528032.
19. Allen E, Doisy EA. An ovarian hormone: preliminary report on its localization, extraction and partial purification, and action in test animals. JAMA. 1923; 81:819–821.
20. Toft D, Gorski J. A receptor molecule for estrogens: isolation from the rat uterus and preliminary characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966; 55:1574–1581. PMID: 5227676.
Article
21. Schally AV, Arimura A, Kastin AJ, Matsuo H, Baba Y, Redding TW, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: one polypeptide regulates secretion of luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones. Science. 1971; 173:1036–1038. PMID: 4938639.
Article
22. Engel JB, Schally AV. Drug insight: clinical use of agonists and antagonists of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 3:157–167. PMID: 17237842.
Article
23. Schally AV, Comaru-Schally AM, Nagy A, Kovacs M, Szepeshazi K, Plonowski A, et al. Hypothalamic hormones and cancer. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2001; 22:248–291. PMID: 11587553.
Article
24. Taylor CW, Green S, Dalton WS, Martino S, Rector D, Ingle JN, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16:994–999. PMID: 9508182.
Article
25. Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Perrotta A, Amoroso D, Balestrero M, De Matteis A, et al. Ovarian ablation versus goserelin with or without tamoxifen in pre-perimenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: results of a multicentric Italian study. Ann Oncol. 1994; 5:337–342. PMID: 8075030.
Article
26. Prowell TM, Davidson NE. What is the role of ovarian ablation in the management of primary and metastatic breast cancer today? Oncologist. 2004; 9:507–517. PMID: 15477635.
Article
27. LHRH-agonists in Early Breast Cancer Overview Group. Cuzick J, Ambroisine L, Davidson N, Jakesz R, Kaufmann M, et al. Use of luteinising-hormone-releasing hormone agonists as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised adjuvant trials. Lancet. 2007; 369:1711–1723. PMID: 17512856.
28. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365:1687–1717. PMID: 15894097.
29. Söreide JA, Varhaug JE, Fjösne HE, Erikstein B, Jacobsen AB, Skovlund E, et al. Adjuvant endocrine treatment (goserelin vs tamoxifen) in premenopausal patients with operable node positive stage II breast cancer: a prospective randomized national multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002; 28:505–510. PMID: 12217302.
Article
30. Tevaarwerk AJ, Wang M, Zhao F, Fetting JH, Cella D, Wagner LI, et al. Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:3948–3958. PMID: 25349302.
Article
31. Ribi K, Luo W, Bernhard J, Francis PA, Burstein HJ, Ciruelos E, et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression versus tamoxifen alone in premenopausal women with early breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1601–1610. PMID: 27022111.
Article
32. Regan MM, Francis PA, Pagani O, Fleming GF, Walley BA, Viale G, et al. Absolute benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapies for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: TEXT and SOFT trials. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:2221–2231. PMID: 27044936.
Article
33. Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Stoeger H, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Knauer M, Moik M, et al. Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26:313–320. PMID: 25403582.
Article
34. Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Poggio F, Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Ugolini D, et al. Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26:2408–2419. PMID: 26347105.
Article
35. Elgindy E, Sibai H, Abdelghani A, Mostafa M. Protecting ovaries during chemotherapy through gonad suppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126:187–195. PMID: 26241272.
36. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:2500–2510. PMID: 23715580.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr