Korean J Neurotrauma.  2016 Oct;12(2):40-46. 10.13004/kjnt.2016.12.2.40.

Current Concept of Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: A Review

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. srjeon@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a catastrophic condition associated with significant neurological deficit, social, and financial burdens. Over the past decades, various treatments including medication, surgery, and rehabilitation therapy for SCI have been performed, but there were no definite treatment option to improve neurological function of patients with chronic SCI. Therefore, new treatment trials with stem cells have been studied to regenerate injured spinal cord. Among various types of stem cells, bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells is highly expected as candidates for the stem cell therapy. The result of the current research showed that direct intramedullary injection to the injured spinal cord site in subacute phase is most effective. Neurological examination, electrophysiologic studies, and magnetic resonance imaging are commonly used to assess the effectiveness of treatment. Diffusion tensor imaging visualizing white matter tract can be also alternative option to identify neuronal regeneration. Despite various challenging issues, stem cell therapy will open new perspectives for SCI treatment.

Keyword

Bone marrow; Cell therapy; Clinical trial; Mesenchymal stem cells; Spinal cord injury

MeSH Terms

Bone Marrow
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Neurologic Examination
Neurons
Regeneration
Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injuries*
Spinal Cord*
Stem Cells*
White Matter

Figure

  • FIGURE 1 (A) Discontinuity of white matter fiber on pre-treatment diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (arrow) (B) remained on DTI 6 months after mesenchymal stem cells injection (arrow). DTI evaluated at 6 months after the operation (D) revealed newly generated continuity in fiber signals (arrowhead) compared to preoperative DTI (arrowhead) (C).


Cited by  1 articles

Reduction of Inflammation and Enhancement of Motility after Pancreatic Islet Derived Stem Cell Transplantation Following Spinal Cord Injury
Erdal Karaoz, Filiz Tepekoy, Irem Yilmaz, Cansu Subasi, Serdar Kabatas
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019;62(2):153-165.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0035.


Reference

1. Abrams MB, Dominguez C, Pernold K, Reger R, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Olson L, et al. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells attenuate chronic inflammation and injury-induced sensitivity to mechanical stimuli in experimental spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009; 27:307–321. PMID: 19738324.
Article
2. Bakshi A, Hunter C, Swanger S, Lepore A, Fischer I. Minimally invasive delivery of stem cells for spinal cord injury: advantages of the lumbar puncture technique. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004; 1:330–337. PMID: 15478372.
Article
3. Branco F, Cardenas DD, Svircev JN. Spinal cord injury: a comprehensive review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007; 18:651–679. PMID: 17967359.
Article
4. Bulte JW, Kraitchman DL. Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed. 2004; 17:484–499. PMID: 15526347.
Article
5. Bunge MB. Novel combination strategies to repair the injured mammalian spinal cord. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008; 31:262–269. PMID: 18795474.
Article
6. Bunge MB, Wood PM. Realizing the maximum potential of Schwann cells to promote recovery from spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012; 109:523–540. PMID: 23098734.
Article
7. Callera F, de Melo CM. Magnetic resonance tracking of magnetically labeled autologous bone marrow CD34+ cells transplanted into the spinal cord via lumbar puncture technique in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: CD34+ cells' migration into the injured site. Stem Cells Dev. 2007; 16:461–466. PMID: 17610376.
Article
8. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 213:341–347. PMID: 17620285.
Article
9. Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. J Pathol. 2009; 217:318–324. PMID: 19023885.
Article
10. Chang Y, Jung TD, Yoo DS, Hyun JK. Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010; 27:2033–2040. PMID: 20822462.
Article
11. Chen Y, Tang Y, Vogel LC, Devivo MJ. Causes of spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013; 19:1–8. PMID: 23678280.
Article
12. Curt A, Schwab ME, Dietz V. Implantation of BM mesenchymal stem cells into injured spinal cord elicits de novo neurogenesis and functional recovery: evidence from a study in rhesus monkeys. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42:1–6. PMID: 14713937.
13. Deng YB, Liu XG, Liu ZG, Liu XL, Liu Y, Zhou GQ. Implantation of BM mesenchymal stem cells into injured spinal cord elicits de novo neurogenesis and functional recovery: evidence from a study in rhesus monkeys. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8:210–214. PMID: 16793730.
Article
14. Duncan ID, Aguayo AJ, Bunge RP, Wood PM. Transplantation of rat Schwann cells grown in tissue culture into the mouse spinal cord. J Neurol Sci. 1981; 49:241–252. PMID: 7217983.
Article
15. Ellingson BM, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN, Schmit BD. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:1976–1982. PMID: 18719029.
Article
16. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45:190–205. PMID: 17179973.
Article
17. Fehlings MG, Tighe A. Spinal cord injury: the promise of translational research. Neurosurg Focus. 2008; 25:E1.
Article
18. Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. The impact of age on mortality, impairment, and disability among adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009; 26:1707–1717. PMID: 19413491.
Article
19. García-Altés A, Pérez K, Novoa A, Suelves JM, Bernabeu M, Vidal J, et al. Spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury: a cost-of-illness study. Neuroepidemiology. 2012; 39:103–108. PMID: 22846706.
Article
20. Gonzalez-Lara LE, Xu X, Hofstetrova K, Pniak A, Chen Y, Mc-Fadden CD, et al. The use of cellular magnetic resonance imaging to track the fate of iron-labeled multipotent stromal cells after direct transplantation in a mouse model of spinal cord injury. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011; 13:702–711. PMID: 20686855.
Article
21. Gresham GE, Labi ML, Dittmar SS, Hicks JT, Joyce SZ, Stehlik MA. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia. 1986; 24:38–44. PMID: 3960588.
Article
22. Guo JS, Zeng YS, Li HB, Huang WL, Liu RY, Li XB, et al. Cotransplant of neural stem cells and NT-3 gene modified Schwann cells promote the recovery of transected spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45:15–24. PMID: 16773039.
Article
23. Guo X, Zahir T, Mothe A, Shoichet MS, Morshead CM, Katayama Y, et al. The effect of growth factors and soluble Nogo-66 receptor protein on transplanted neural stem/progenitor survival and axonal regeneration after complete transection of rat spinal cord. Cell Transplant. 2012; 21:1177–1197. PMID: 22236767.
Article
24. Guzman R, Uchida N, Bliss TM, He D, Christopherson KK, Stellwagen D, et al. Long-term monitoring of transplanted human neural stem cells in developmental and pathological contexts with MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:10211–10216. PMID: 17553967.
Article
25. Hall ED, Springer JE. Neuroprotection and acute spinal cord injury: a reappraisal. NeuroRx. 2004; 1:80–100. PMID: 15717009.
Article
26. Himes BT, Neuhuber B, Coleman C, Kushner R, Swanger SA, Kopen GC, et al. Recovery of function following grafting of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells into the injured spinal cord. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20:278–296. PMID: 16679505.
Article
27. Hofstetter CP, Schwarz EJ, Hess D, Widenfalk J, El Manira A, Prockop DJ, et al. Marrow stromal cells form guiding strands in the injured spinal cord and promote recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99:2199–2204. PMID: 11854516.
Article
28. Houle JD, Tessler A. Repair of chronic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2003; 182:247–260. PMID: 12895437.
Article
29. Huang H, Chen L, Xi H, Wang Q, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. Olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation for central nervous system diseases in 1,255 patients. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009; 23:14–20. PMID: 19192871.
30. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Eftekharpour E, Wang J, Schut D, Fehlings MG. Synergistic effects of transplanted adult neural stem/progenitor cells, chondroitinase, and growth factors promote functional repair and plasticity of the chronically injured spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2010; 30:1657–1676. PMID: 20130176.
Article
31. Kim SU. Human neural stem cells genetically modified for brain repair in neurological disorders. Neuropathology. 2004; 24:159–171. PMID: 15484694.
Article
32. Kirshblum S, Waring W 3rd. Updates for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014; 25:505–517. PMID: 25064785.
Article
33. Kirshblum SC, O'Connor KC. Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79:1456–1466. PMID: 9821910.
Article
34. Knoller N, Auerbach G, Fulga V, Zelig G, Attias J, Bakimer R, et al. Clinical experience using incubated autologous macrophages as a treatment for complete spinal cord injury: phase I study results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3:173–181. PMID: 16235699.
Article
35. Kobayashi NR, Fan DP, Giehl KM, Bedard AM, Wiegand SJ, Tetzlaff W. BDNF and NT-4/5 prevent atrophy of rat rubrospinal neurons after cervical axotomy, stimulate GAP-43 and Talpha1-tubulin mRNA expression, and promote axonal regeneration. J Neurosci. 1997; 17:9583–9595. PMID: 9391013.
36. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, Clark CA, Pappata S, Molko N, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13:534–546. PMID: 11276097.
Article
37. Leal-Filho MB. Spinal cord injury: From inflammation to glial scar. Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2:112. PMID: 21886885.
Article
38. Li JY, Christophersen NS, Hall V, Soulet D, Brundin P. Critical issues of clinical human embryonic stem cell therapy for brain repair. Trends Neurosci. 2008; 31:146–153. PMID: 18255164.
Article
39. Lima C, Escada P, Pratas-Vital J, Branco C, Arcangeli CA, Lazzeri G, et al. Olfactory mucosal autografts and rehabilitation for chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24:10–22. PMID: 19794133.
Article
40. Mackay-Sim A, Féron F, Cochrane J, Bassingthwaighte L, Bayliss C, Davies W, et al. Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial. Brain. 2008; 131:2376–2386. PMID: 18689435.
Article
41. Mariano ED, Batista CM, Barbosa BJ, Marie SK, Teixeira MJ, Morgalla M, et al. Current perspectives in stem cell therapy for spinal cord repair in humans: a review of work from the past 10 years. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014; 72:451–456. PMID: 24964113.
Article
42. McDonald JW, Liu XZ, Qu Y, Liu S, Mickey SK, Turetsky D, et al. Transplanted embryonic stem cells survive, differentiate and promote recovery in injured rat spinal cord. Nat Med. 1999; 5:1410–1412. PMID: 10581084.
Article
43. Mothe AJ, Tator CH. Advances in stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122:3824–3834. PMID: 23114605.
Article
44. Murry CE, Keller G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell. 2008; 132:661–680. PMID: 18295582.
45. Neirinckx V, Cantinieaux D, Coste C, Rogister B, Franzen R, Wislet-Gendebien S. Concise review: Spinal cord injuries: how could adult mesenchymal and neural crest stem cells take up the challenge? Stem Cells. 2014; 32:829–843. PMID: 24155224.
Article
46. Neuhuber B, Timothy Himes B, Shumsky JS, Gallo G, Fischer I. Axon growth and recovery of function supported by human bone marrow stromal cells in the injured spinal cord exhibit donor variations. Brain Res. 2005; 1035:73–85. PMID: 15713279.
Article
47. Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, Baxter D, Singh A, Fehlings MG, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology. 2012; 38:219–226. PMID: 22555590.
Article
48. Nori S, Okada Y, Yasuda A, Tsuji O, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Grafted human-induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived neurospheres promote motor functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:16825–16830. PMID: 21949375.
Article
49. Okada S, Ishii K, Yamane J, Iwanami A, Ikegami T, Katoh H, et al. In vivo imaging of engrafted neural stem cells: its application in evaluating the optimal timing of transplantation for spinal cord injury. FASEB J. 2005; 19:1839–1841. PMID: 16141363.
Article
50. Ota T, Akaboshi K, Nagata M, Sonoda S, Domen K, Seki M, et al. Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional Independence Measure. Spinal Cord. 1996; 34:531–535. PMID: 8883187.
Article
51. Park JH, Kim DY, Sung IY, Choi GH, Jeon MH, Kim KK, et al. Long-term results of spinal cord injury therapy using mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow in humans. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70:1238–1247. PMID: 22127044.
Article
52. Parr AM, Kulbatski I, Tator CH. Transplantation of adult rat spinal cord stem/progenitor cells for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24:835–845. PMID: 17518538.
Article
53. Paul C, Samdani AF, Betz RR, Fischer I, Neuhuber B. Grafting of human bone marrow stromal cells into spinal cord injury: a comparison of delivery methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34:328–334. PMID: 19182705.
54. Polinder S, Meerding WJ, Mulder S, Petridou E, van Beeck E. Assessing the burden of injury in six European countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:27–34. PMID: 17242755.
Article
55. Rajasekaran S, Kanna RM, Shetty AP. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord and its clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94:1024–1031. PMID: 22844041.
Article
56. Ryu HH, Lim JH, Byeon YE, Park JR, Seo MS, Lee YW, et al. Functional recovery and neural differentiation after transplantation of allogenic adipose-derived stem cells in a canine model of acute spinal cord injury. J Vet Sci. 2009; 10:273–284. PMID: 19934591.
Article
57. Saberi H, Firouzi M, Habibi Z, Moshayedi P, Aghayan HR, Arjmand B, et al. Safety of intramedullary Schwann cell transplantation for postrehabilitation spinal cord injuries: 2-year follow-up of 33 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 15:515–525. PMID: 21800956.
Article
58. Snyder EY, Teng YD. Stem cells and spinal cord repair. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:1940–1942. PMID: 22591301.
Article
59. Sohni A, Verfaillie CM. Mesenchymal stem cells migration homing and tracking. Stem Cells Int. 2013; 2013:130763. PMID: 24194766.
Article
60. Storer PD, Houle JD. betaII-tubulin and GAP 43 mRNA expression in chronically injured neurons of the red nucleus after a second spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2003; 183:537–547. PMID: 14552895.
61. Suh HI, Min J, Choi KH, Kim SW, Kim KS, Jeon SR. Axonal regeneration effects of Wnt3a-secreting fibroblast transplantation in spinal cord-injured rats. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011; 153:1003–1010. PMID: 21249402.
Article
62. Tator CH. Update on the pathophysiology and pathology of acute spinal cord injury. Brain Pathol. 1995; 5:407–413. PMID: 8974623.
Article
63. Tator CH. Review of treatment trials in human spinal cord injury: issues, difficulties, and recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2006; 59:957–982. discussion 982-987. PMID: 17143232.
64. Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg. 1991; 75:15–26. PMID: 2045903.
Article
65. Tobias CA, Han SS, Shumsky JS, Kim D, Tumolo M, Dhoot NO, et al. Alginate encapsulated BDNF-producing fibroblast grafts permit recovery of function after spinal cord injury in the absence of immune suppression. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 22:138–156. PMID: 15665609.
Article
66. Vazin T, Freed WJ. Human embryonic stem cells: derivation, culture, and differentiation: a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010; 28:589–603. PMID: 20714081.
Article
67. Verma A, Verma N. Induced pluripotent stem cells and promises of neuroregenerative medicine. Neurol India. 2011; 59:555–557. PMID: 21891933.
Article
68. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988; 10:64–67. PMID: 3042746.
Article
69. Wallace M, Shelkey M. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Urol Nurs. 2007; 27:93–94. PMID: 17390935.
70. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006; 44:523–529. PMID: 16389270.
Article
71. Xu L, Yan J, Chen D, Welsh AM, Hazel T, Johe K, et al. Human neural stem cell grafts ameliorate motor neuron disease in SOD-1 transgenic rats. Transplantation. 2006; 82:865–875. PMID: 17038899.
Article
72. Yoon SH, Shim YS, Park YH, Chung JK, Nam JH, Kim MO, et al. Phase I/II clinical trial. Stem Cells. 2007; 25:2066–2073. PMID: 17464087.
73. Zhu J, Zhou L, XingWu F. Tracking neural stem cells in patients with brain trauma. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:2376–2378. PMID: 17135597.
Article
74. Zhu T, Tang Q, Gao H, Shen Y, Chen L, Zhu J. Current status of cell-mediated regenerative therapies for human spinal cord injury. Neurosci Bull. 2014; 30:671–682. PMID: 24817389.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr