1. Heijnsbroek M, Paraskevas S, Van der Weijden GA. Fluoride interventions for root caries: a review. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007; 5:145–152.
2. Amer RS, Kolker JL. Restoration of root surface caries in vulnerable elderly patients: a review of the literature. Spec Care Dentist. 2013; 33:141–149.
Article
3. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:e24–e37.
Article
4. Ngo H, Ruben J, Arends J, White D, Mount GJ, Peters MC, Faller RV, Pfarrer A. Electron probe microanalysis and transverse microradiography studies of artificial lesions in enamel and dentin: a comparative study. Adv Dent Res. 1997; 11:426–432.
Article
5. Ngo HC, Mount G, McIntyre J, Do L. An in vitro model for the study of chemical exchange between glass ionomer restorations and partially demineralized dentin using a minimally invasive restorative technique. J Dent. 2011; 39:Supplement 2. S20–S26.
6. Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Frencken JE, Truin GJ, Huysmans MC. Does incomplete caries removal reduce strength of restored teeth? J Dent Res. 2010; 89:1270–1275.
Article
7. ten Cate JM, Buijs MJ, Miller CC, Exterkate RA. Elevated fluoride products enhance remineralization of advanced enamel lesions. J Dent Res. 2008; 87:943–947.
Article
8. Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(Spec No C):C35–C38.
Article
9. Schwendicke F, Meyer-Lueckel H, Schulz M, Dörfer CE, Paris S. Radiopaque tagging masks caries lesions following incomplete excavation
in vitro. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:565–570.
Article
10. Pugach MK, Strother J, Darling CL, Fried D, Gansky SA, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Dentin caries zones: mineral, structure, and properties. J Dent Res. 2009; 88:71–76.
Article
11. Joves GJ, Inoue G, Nakashima S, Sadr A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Mineral density, morphology and bond strength of natural versus artificial caries-affected dentin. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32:138–143.
Article
12. Shen S, Samaranayake LP, Yip HK.
In vitro growth, acidogenicity and cariogenicity of predominant human root caries flora. J Dent. 2004; 32:667–678.
Article
13. McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent. 2002; 27:430–437.
14. De Moor RJ, Stassen IG, van't Veldt Y, Torbeyns D, Hommez GM. Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15:31–38.
Article
15. Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Fukuda R, Snauwaert J, Nakayama Y, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:656–661.
Article
16. AL-Helal AS, Armstrong SR, Xie XJ, Wefel JS. Effect of smear layer on root demineralization adjacent to resin-modified glass ionomer. J Dent Res. 2003; 82:146–150.
Article
17. Ab-Ghani Z, Ngo H, McIntyre J. Effect of remineralization /demineralization cycles on mineral profiles of Fuji IX Fast
in vitro using electron probe microanalysis. Aust Dent J. 2007; 52:276–281.
Article
18. Borczyk D, Piatowska D, Krzemiński Z. An
in vitro study of affected dentin as a risk factor for the development of secondary caries. Caries Res. 2006; 40:47–51.
Article
19. Boston DW, Liao J. Staining of non-carious human coronal dentin by caries dyes. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:280–286.