J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2011 Apr;41(2):60-66.

Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hjyperio@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to evaluate the buccal and lingual bone thickness in the anterior teeth and the relationship between bone thickness and the tissue biotype.
METHODS
Three male and two female human cadaver heads (mean age, 55.4 years) were used in this study. First, the biotype of periodontium was evaluated and categorized into a thick or a thin group. Next, full thickness reflections of the mandible and the maxilla to expose the underlying bone for accurate measurements in the anterior regions were performed. After the removal of the half of the alveolar bone, the probe with a stopper was used to measure the thickness of bone plate at the alveolar crest (AC), 3 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-3), 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-6), and 9 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-9).
RESULTS
Four of them had a thick biotype. There was no penetration or dehiscence. The thickness of the buccal plates at the alveolar crest were 0.97+/-0.18 mm, 0.78+/-0.21 mm, and 0.95+/-0.35 mm in the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines, respectively. The thickness of the labial plates at the alveolar crest were 0.86+/-0.59 mm, 0.88+/-0.70 mm, and 1.17+/-0.70 mm in the mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors and canines, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The thickness of the labial plate in the maxillary anteriors is very thin that great caution is needed for placing an implant. The present study showed the bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors at different positions. Therefore, these data can be useful for the understanding of the bone thickness of the anteriors and a successful implant placement.

Keyword

Alveolar bone; Dental esthetics; Dental implants

MeSH Terms

Bone Plates
Cadaver
Dental Implants
Esthetics, Dental
Female
Head
Humans
Hyoid Bone
Incisor
Male
Mandible
Maxilla
Periodontium
Tooth
Dental Implants

Figure

  • Figure 1 Bilateral measurements were made on the human cadaver heads.

  • Figure 2 A periodontal probe was placed into the facial aspect of the gingiva (A), and the depth of periodontal probe penetration was measured with digital calipers (B).

  • Figure 3 The thickness of the buccal and palatal/lingual plates was measured with digital calipers (A), and the measurements were taken along the line to the middle of the teeth and parallel to the long axis of the teeth (B). AC-3: 3 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC), AC-6: 6 mm apical to the AC, AC-9: 9 mm apical to the AC, CEJ-AC: the distance between cementoenamel (CEJ) junction and AC.

  • Figure 4 4. A probe with a stopper was used to measure the thickness of the bone plate at each position and landmarks used to describe the dimension of bone thickness in the anteriors: alveolar crest (AC), 3 mm apical to the AC (AC-3), 6 mm apical to the AC (AC-6), and 9 mm apical to the AC (AC-9).

  • Figure 5 The thickness of the labial and palatal/lingual plates in the anteriors and the distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar crest (mean±SD mm). AC-3: 3 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC), AC-6: 6 mm apical to the AC, AC-9: 9 mm apical to the AC, CEJ-AC: the distance between CEJ, and AC. Mx.: maxilla, Mn.: mandible.


Reference

1. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. 18:707–714.
Article
2. Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol. 2007. 33:211–220.
Article
3. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. 19:73–80.
Article
4. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989. 9:332–343.
5. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003. 74:557–562.
Article
6. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. 18:552–562.
Article
7. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000. 15:265–271.
8. Becker BE, Becker W, Ricci A, Geurs N. A prospective clinical trial of endosseous screw-shaped implants placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation. J Periodontol. 1998. 69:920–926.
Article
9. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol. 2001. 72:1560–1571.
Article
10. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005. 32:212–218.
Article
11. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005. 32:645–652.
Article
12. Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:606–614.
Article
13. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004. 15:285–292.
Article
14. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:351–358.
Article
15. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005. 7:Suppl 1. S21–S27.
Article
16. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. Immediate implant placement: a procedure without incisions. J Periodontol. 1998. 69:743–750.
Article
17. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG. Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation. J Periodontol. 2009. 80:163–172.
Article
18. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004. 19:Suppl. 43–61.
19. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005. 25:113–119.
20. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010. 21:22–29.
Article
21. Katranji A, Misch K, Wang HL. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers. J Periodontol. 2007. 78:874–878.
Article
22. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010. 30:237–243.
23. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:615–624.
Article
24. Pennel BM, King KO, Wilderman MN, Barron JM. Repair of the alveolar process following osseous surgery. J Periodontol. 1967. 38:426–431.
Article
25. Wilderman MN, Pennel BM, King K, Barron JM. Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. J Periodontol. 1970. 41:551–565.
Article
26. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL. Bilaminar subepithelial connective tissue grafts for immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005. 33:865–871.
27. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M. Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: a volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2008. 35:356–363.
Article
28. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. 20:545–549.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr