Tuberc Respir Dis.  2009 Jan;66(1):13-19.

The Diagnostic Value of Interferon-gamma Assay in Patients with Active Tuberculosis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea. ekmo@hallym.or.kr
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The interferon-gamma assay is reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for making the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. The clinical usefulness of this essay for detecting active tuberculosis has not fully defined. We evaluated the diagnostic value of the commercial interferon-gamma assay kit (QuantiFERONTB GOLD) for patients with suspected tuberculosis.
METHODS
From January to August 2007, we recruited 52 patients with suspected tuberculosis infection. We performed chest X-ray, sputum smear, culture, PCR and the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test. Pleural fluid analysis and pleural biopsy were also done for the patients with pleural effusion.
RESULTS
Of the 52 patients we studied, 30 patients had a positive QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test result. 35 patients were finally diagnosed with active tuberculosis: twenty-five with a positive QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test and 10 with a negative QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test. The sensitivity of the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test was 71.4% and the specificity was 64.7%. The positive predictive value was 0.83 and the negative predictive value was 0.50. There was no significant difference of any of the clinical and laboratory characteristics between the two groups of patients except the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. The CRP level was 29.2+/-27.3 mg/dL in the pulmonary tuberculosis patients with a positive QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test and 72.9+/-67.9 mg/dL in the patients with a negative QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The sensitivity and specificity of the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test were inadequate for making the diagnosis of active tuberculosis. We suggest that the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test should not be used by itself to exclude the diagnosis of active tuberculosis. The relationship of the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD test and the CRP level in patients with TB would be further investigated.

Keyword

Active tuberculosis; QuantiFERON-TB GOLD; C-reactive protein

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
C-Reactive Protein
Humans
Interferon-gamma
Latent Tuberculosis
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sputum
Thorax
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
C-Reactive Protein
Interferon-gamma

Reference

1. Lönnroth K, Raviglione M. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis: prospects for control. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008. 29:481–491.
2. Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed DM, Hosseini SM, Raviglione MC. Evolution of tuberculosis control and prospects for reducing tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, and deaths globally. JAMA. 2005. 293:2767–2775.
3. Jasmer RM, Nahid P, Hopewell PC. Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347:1860–1866.
4. Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual report on the notified tuberculosis patients in Korea. 2005. Seoul: Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Korean Institute for Tuberculosis.
5. Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Disease Society of America, September 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. 161:1376–1395.
6. Mori T, Sakatani M, Yamagishi F, Takashima T, Kawabe Y, Nagao K, et al. Specific detection of tuberculosis infection: an interferon-gamma-based assay using new antigens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004. 170:59–64.
7. Anderson BL, Welch RJ, Litwin CM. Assessment of three commercially available serologic assays for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of active tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008. 15:1644–1649.
8. Bartu V, Havelkova M, Kopecka E. QuantiFERON-TB Gold in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis. J Int Med Res. 2008. 36:434–437.
9. Dewan PK, Grinsdale J, Kawamura LM. Low sensitivity of a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay for detection of active tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. 44:69–73.
10. Goletti D, Stefania C, Butera O, Amicosante M, Ernst M, Sauzullo I, et al. Accuracy of immunodiagnostic tests for active tuberculosis using single and combined results: a multicenter TBNET-Study. PLoS ONE. 2008. 3:e3417.
11. Kang YA, Lee HW, Hwang SS, Um SW, Han SK, Shim YS, et al. Usefulness of whole-blood interferon-gamma assay and interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay in the diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 2007. 132:959–965.
12. Bellete B, Coberly J, Barnes GL, Ko C, Chaisson RE, Comstock GW, et al. Evaluation of a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in 2 study populations. Clin Infect Dis. 2002. 34:1449–1456.
13. Ferrara G, Losi M, D'Amico R, Roversi P, Piro R, Meacci M, et al. Use in routine clinical practice of two commercial blood tests for diagnosis of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a prospective study. Lancet. 2006. 367:1328–1334.
14. Kobashi Y, Obase Y, Fukuda M, Yoshida K, Miyashita N, Oka M. Clinical reevaluation of the QuantiFERON TB-2G test as a diagnostic method for differentiating active tuberculosis from nontuberculous mycobacteriosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. 43:1540–1546.
15. Richeldi L. An update on the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006. 174:736–742.
16. Harada N, Higuchi K, Yoshiyama T, Kawabe Y, Fujita A, Sasaki Y, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of two whole blood interferon-gamma assays for M. tuberculosis infection. J Infect. 2008. 56:348–353.
17. Pai M, Menzies D. Interferon-gamma release assays: what is their role in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis? Clin Infect Dis. 2007. 44:74–77.
18. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2008. 149:177–184.
19. López-Maderuelo D, Arnalich F, Serantes R, González A, Codoceo R, Madero R, et al. Interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms in pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003. 167:970–975.
20. Pravica V, Asderakis A, Perrey C, Hajeer A, Sinnott PJ, Hutchinson IV. In vitro production of IFN-gamma correlates with CA repeat polymorphism in the human IFN-gamma gene. Eur J Immunogenet. 1999. 26:1–3.
21. Oh JH, Yang CS, Noh YK, Kweon YM, Jung SS, Son JW, et al. Polymorphisms of interleukin-10 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha genes are associated with newly diagnosed and recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis. Respirology. 2007. 12:594–598.
22. Tso HW, Ip WK, Chong WP, Tam CM, Chiang AK, Lau YL. Association of interferon gamma and interleukin 10 genes with tuberculosis in Hong Kong Chinese. Genes Immun. 2005. 6:358–363.
23. Sahiratmadja E, Alisjahbana B, de Boer T, Adnan I, Maya A, Danusantoso H, et al. Dynamic changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles and gamma interferon receptor signaling integrity correlate with tuberculosis disease activity and response to curative treatment. Infect Immun. 2007. 75:820–829.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr