Prog Med Phys.  2013 Mar;24(1):1-24.

Guideline for Imaging Dose on Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bccho@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha Univeristy Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Asan, Korea.
  • 7Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 8Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.
  • 9Department of Radiation Oncology, Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 10Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 11Research Center for Radiotherapy, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

As image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has been commonly used for more accurate patient setup and monitoring tumor movement during radiation therapy, the necessity for management of imaging dose is increased. However, it has not been an interest issue to radiation therapy communities because the imaging dose is much lower than the therapeutic dose. However, since the cumulative dose from 4DCT and repeated imaging for daily setup verificationin would not be ignorable, appropriate dose management based on ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle is required. In this study, we aimed that (1) survey on imaging equipments and modalities used for IGRT, (2) estimation of IGRT imaging dose depending on treatment types and equipments, (3) collecting data of effective dose on treatment sites from each equipment and imaging protocol, and thus finally provide guideline for imaging dose reduction and optimization.

Keyword

Radiation therapy; Image-guided radiation therapy; Imaging dose; Effective dose

MeSH Terms

Humans
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided

Figure

  • Fig. 1. CTDI 측정 팬텀, 10 cm 연필형 전리함 및 전리계21) 및 CTDI 의미 설명.

  • Fig. 2. 두부 및 체부 CTDI 측정용 팬텀과 연필형 전리함 삽입 위치.

  • Fig. 3. CT검사 결과로 보고, 기록되는 CTDIvol 및 DLP 예.

  • Fig. 4. 치료계획용 투시장치의 촬영조건에 대한 boxplot.

  • Fig. 5. 치료계획용 CT의 촬영조건에 대한 boxplot. 관전압은 120 kVp로 모두 동일하였음.

  • Fig. 6. 치료계획용 CT의 임상선량 현황 boxplot. CTDIvol (a) 및 DLP (b). 2009년 CT 엑스선검사에 환자선량 권고량 식약청 가이드라 인(K-DRL)과 비교하였음.

  • Fig. 7. 치료계획용 CT촬영에 따른 유효선량. 일반 CT (a) 및 4DCT (b).

  • Fig. 8. 영상유도 방사선치료의 장비별, 부위별 영상 선량.

  • Fig. 9. 영상유도 방사선치료의 장비별, 부위별 유효선량.

  • Fig. 10. 영상유도 방사선치료 시나리오 별 누적 유효선량.


Reference

References

1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 357(22):2277–2284. 2007.
2. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans per – formed in the United State s in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 169(22):2071–2077. 2009.
3. Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, Wagner LK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. A J R Am J Roe ntgenol. 177:3–20. 2001.
4. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm185898.htm,SafetyInvestigationofCTBrainPerfusionScans:Update11/9/2010
5. http://www.imagegently.org
6. http://www.imagewisely.org
7. Aird EGA. Second cancer risk, concomitant exposures, and IRMER2000. Br J Radiol. 77:983–985. 2004.
Article
8. Shope TB. Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. Radiographics. 16:1195–1199. 1996.
Article
9. Followill D, Geis P, Boyer A. Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensitymodulated conformal therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 38:667–672. 1997.
10. Hall EJ, Wuu CS. Radiation-induced second cancers: The impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 56:83–88. 2003.
Article
11. Brenner D. Induced cancers after prostate-cancer radiotherapy: No cause for concern? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 65:637–639. 2006.
12. BEIR: Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations BEIR V, National, Research Council, Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR V National Academy Press. Washington, DC (. 1990.
13. Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: Going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol. 32:228–231. 2002.
Article
14. NCRP: Medical x-ray, electron beam and gamma-ray protection for energies up to 50 MeV Equipment design, performance and use. NCRP Report 102 (. 1989.
15. Tremains MR, Georgiadis GM, Dennis MJ. Radiation exposure with use of the inverted C-arm technique in upper-extremity surgery. J Bone Jt Surg. 83A:674–768. 2001.
16. Chu RYL, Fisher J, Archer BR, et al. Standardized methods for measuring diagnostic x-ray exposures. AAPM Report 31 (. 1990.
17. McCollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys. 27:828–837. 2000.
Article
18. Jacobi W. The concept of effective dose: A proposal for the combination of organ doses. J Radiat Environ Biophys. 12:101–109. 1975.
19. Perkins CL, Fox T, Elder E, Kooby DA, Staley III CA, Landry J. Image-guided radiation therapy IGRT in gastrointestinal tumors. JOP: Journal of the Pancreas Online. 7:372–381. 2006.
20. Nagel HD. Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography. CTB Publications, Hamburg, Germany (. 2002.
21. McCollough C, Leng S, Yu L, Cody D, Boone J, Gray M. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology. 259(2):311–316. 2011.
22. 보건복지부, 방사선안전관리시리즈 No.19: CT 엑스선검사에서 의 환자선량 권고량 가이드라인. 2009.
23. Low DA, Nystrom M, Kalinin E, et al. A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. Med Phys. 30:1254–1263. 2003.
Article
24. Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD, et al. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 33:1573–1582. 2006.
Article
25. Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J, et al. Doses from cone beam CT integrated to a radiotherapy treatment machine. United Kingdom Radiation Oncology Conference (. 2005.
26. Song W, Kamath S, Ozawa S, et al. A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. Med Phys. 35(2):480–486. 2008.
27. Ding G, Munro P, Pawlowski J, et al. Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging. Radiother Oncol. 97:585–592. 2010.
Article
28. Chen J, Morin O, Aubin M, Bucci MK, Chuang CF, Pouliot J. Dose-guided radiation therapy with megavoltage cone-beam CT. Br J Radiol. 79:S87–S98. 2006.
Article
29. Winston JP, Gilley DB. Patient Exposure and Dose Guide 2003, Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. CRCPD publication E-03–2 (. 2003.
30. http://www.cyberknife.com.tr/images/yayin/Imaging_Whitepaper.pdf,EstimationoftheimagingdosefortheCyberkniferoboticradiosurgerysystem
31. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 79:968–980. 2006.
Article
32. Huda W, Ogden MK, Khorasani M. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 248:995–1003. 2008.
Article
33. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 10:195–204. 2009.
Article
34. Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Hintenlang DE. Characterization of a water-equivalent fiberoptic coupled dosimeter for use in diagnostic radiology. Med Phys. 36:1711–1716. 2009.
Article
35. Hyer DE, Serago CF, Kim S, Li JG, Hintenlang DE. An organ and effective dose study of XVI and OBI cone-beam CT systems. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 11:181–197. 2010.
Article
36. Hyera DE, Hintenlang DE. Estimation of organ doses from kilovoltage cone-beam CT imaging used during radiotherapy patient position verification. Med Phys. 37:4620–4626. 2010.
37. Waddington SP, McKensie AL. Assessment of effective dose from concomitant exposures required in verification of the target volume in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 77:557–561. 2004.
Article
38. CEP10071. X-ray tomographic image guided radiotherapy systems. Purchasing and Supply Agency (. 2010.
39. Shah AP, Langen KM, Ruchala KJ, Cox A, Kupelian PA, Meeks SK. Patient dose from megavoltage computed tomography imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 70:1579–1587. 2008.
Article
40. Morin O, Gillis A, Descovich M, et al. Patient dose considerations for routine megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging. Med Phys. 34:1819–1827. 2007.
Article
41. Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. Med Phys. 28:220–231. 2001.
Article
42. Wong JW, Sharpe M, Jaffray D, et al. The use of active breathing control ABC to reduce margin for breathing motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 44:911–919. 1999.
Article
43. Kubo HD, Hill BC. Respiration gated radiotherapy treatment: A technical study. Phys Med Biol. 41:83–91. 1996.
Article
44. Schweikard A, Glosser G, Bodduluri M, Murphy M, Adler JR. R obotic motion compensation for respiratory movement during radiosurgery. Comput Aided Surg. 5:263–277. 2000.
45. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Burch S, et al. Volume CT with a f l a t -pa ne l detector on a mobile, isoce ntric C -ar m: Pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys. 32:241–254. 2005.
46. Murphy MJ, Chang SD, Gibbs IC. Patte rns of pa tient movement during fra meless imageguided radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Onc ol Biol P hys. 55:1400–l408. 2003.
Full Text Links
  • PMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr