Korean J Fam Med.  2011 Mar;32(3):189-196. 10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.3.189.

Comparison of the Framingham Risk Score, UKPDS Risk Engine, and SCORE for Predicting Carotid Atherosclerosis and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Korean Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 2Gwangju-Jeonnam Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Seonam University College of Medicine, Namwon, Korea.
  • 4Jeonbuk Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.
  • 5Jeonnam Regional Cancer Center, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
  • 6Chungnam Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. jcsw74@hanmail.net

Abstract

BACKGROUND
To compare the predictability of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine, and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) for carotid atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease in Korean type 2 diabetic patients.
METHODS
Among 1,275 registered type 2 diabetes patients in the health center, 621 subjects with type 2 diabetes participated in the study. Well-trained examiners measured the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), carotid plaque, and ankle brachial index (ABI). The subject's 10-year risk of coronary heart disease was calculated according to the FRS, UKPDS, and SCORE risk scores. These three risk scores were compared to the areas under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS
The odds ratios (ORs) of all risk scores increased as the quartiles increased for plaque, IMT, and ABI. For plaque and IMT, the UKPDS risk score provided the highest OR (95% confidence interval) at 3.82 (2.36, 6.17) and at 6.21 (3.37, 11.45). For ABI, the SCORE risk estimation provided the highest OR at 7.41 (3.20, 17.18). However, no significant difference was detected for plaque, IMT, or ABI (P = 0.839, 0.313, and 0.113, respectively) when the AUCs of the three risk scores were compared. When we graphed the Kernel density distribution of these three risk scores, UKPDS had a higher distribution than FRS and SCORE.
CONCLUSION
No significant difference was observed when comparing the predictability of the FRS, UKPDS risk engine, and SCORE risk estimation for carotid atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease in Korean type 2 diabetic patients.

Keyword

Risk Assessment; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Carotid Artery Thrombosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

MeSH Terms

Ankle Brachial Index
Area Under Curve
Carotid Artery Diseases
Carotid Artery Thrombosis
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Coronary Disease
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Great Britain
Humans
Odds Ratio
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Risk Assessment
Full Text Links
  • KJFM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr