Cancer Res Treat.  2005 Jun;37(3):171-176.

Co-Expression of Cox-2, C-Met and beta-catenin in Cells Forming Invasive front of Gallbladder Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Chonbuk National University, Medical School and Center for Healthcare Technology Development, Jeonju, Korea. mws@chonbuk.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Forensic Pathology, Chonbuk National University, Medical School and Center for Healthcare Technology Development, Jeonju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Long Beach, California and the University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Gallbladder cancer is a malignancy with poor prognosis, predominantly resulting from invasion and metastasis. Our previous studies have demonstrated that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), generated by cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox-2), transactivates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), c-Met and beta-catenin; thus, enhancing colon cancer cell growth and invasiveness in vitro. To determine whether these findings are applicable to clinical conditions, we examined the expression and cellular localization/co-localization of Cox-2, c-Met, beta-catenin, EGFR and c-erbB2 in gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five specimens of invasive gallbladder cancer, 8 in situ carcinoma and 7 adenoma specimens were immunostained with specific antibodies against Cox-2, c-Met, beta-catenin, EGFR and c-erbB2. The cellular distribution, localization and co- localization were examined, and the signal intensities quantified in: a) the central area of gallbladder cancer and b) cancer cells forming the invasive front. RESULTS: Cox-2, c-Met, beta-catenin, c-erbB2 and EGFR were over-expressed in 80, 74, 71, 62 and 11% of invasive gallbladder cancers, respectively. beta-catenin was expressed in 80% of non-malignant specimens, exclusively in the cell membrane, while the cancer specimens showed cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining. Significantly higher Cox-2, c-Met and beta-catenin expressions were present in cancer cells of the invasive front than in the tumor central areas (p<0.001), and these expressions were significantly (p=0.01) associated with the invasion depth. Co- expressions of Cox-2, c-Met, beta-catenin and c-erbB2 were present in 42% of the specimens in cancer cells forming the invasive front. CONCLUSION: The overexpressions, and often co-localizations, of Cox-2, c-Met and beta-catenin in cancer cells forming the invasive front indicate their local interactions and important roles in invasion.

Keyword

Gallbladder neoplasms; Immunohistochemistry; Cyclooxygenase 2; Proto-Oncogene Protein c-met; Beta catenin

MeSH Terms

Adenoma
Antibodies
beta Catenin*
Cell Membrane
Colonic Neoplasms
Cyclooxygenase 2
Cytoplasm
Dinoprostone
Gallbladder Neoplasms*
Gallbladder*
Immunohistochemistry
Neoplasm Metastasis
Prognosis
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Antibodies
Cyclooxygenase 2
Dinoprostone
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
beta Catenin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Representative immunostaining for EGFR, c-erbB2, Cox-2, c-Met and β-catenin in gallbladder cancer. A-B) Cancer cells showed selective membrane staining for EGFR (A, ×200, scale bar 100 µm) and c-erbB2 (B, ×400, scale bar 100 µm). Note the absence of immunoreactivity in normal mucosal cells. Immunohistochemistry for c-Met (C, ×400, scale bar 100 µm) and Cox-2 (D, ×400, scale bar 100 µm) displayed cytoplasmic and membrane positivity. E-G) β-catenin staining showed normal mucosal cells, with membrane staining (E, ×200, scale bar 100 µm), cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in cancer cells (F, ×100, scale bar 100 µm), and nuclear localization in cancer cells at the invasive front (G, ×400, scale bar 100 µm).

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of the signal intensities in cancer cells between the central area and invasive front. A-B) β-catenin (A, ×100, scale bar 100µm) (B, ×100, scale bar 100µm), C-D) Cox-2 (C, ×40, scale bar 1 mm) (D, ×100, scale bar 100µm) and E-F) c-Met (E, ×40, scale bar 1 mm) (F, ×100, scale bar 100µm). Note the increased immunoreactivities of Cox-2, c-Met and β-catenin in cancer cells forming the invasive front (arrows) compared to those of cells in the central area.


Reference

1. Ito H, Matros E, Brooks DC, Osteen RT, Zinner MJ, Swanson RS, et al. Treatment outcomes associated with surgery for gallbladder cancer: a 20-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8:183–190. PMID: 15036194.
Article
2. Aldridge MC, Bismuth H. Gallbladder cancer: the polyp-cancer sequence. Br J Surg. 1990; 77:363–364. PMID: 2187556.
Article
3. Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferrenbach S, DuBois RN. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107:1183–1188. PMID: 7926468.
Article
4. van Rees BP, Ristimaki A. Cyclooxygenase-2 in carcinogenesis of the gastrointestinal tract. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001; 36:897–903. PMID: 11521977.
5. Asano T, Shoda J, Ueda T, Kawamoto T, Todoroki T, Shimonishi M, et al. Expressions of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E-receptors in carcinoma of the gallbladder: crucial role of arachidonate metabolism in tumor growth and progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8:1157–1167. PMID: 11948128.
6. Ohno R, Yoshinaga K, Fujita T, Hasegawa K, Iseki H, Tsunozaki H, et al. Depth of invasion parallels increased cyclooxygenase-2 levels in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2001; 91:1876–1881. PMID: 11346869.
Article
7. Shirahama T, Arima J, Akiba S, Sakakura C. Relation between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and tumor invasiveness and patient survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Cancer. 2001; 92:188–193. PMID: 11443626.
Article
8. Rozic JG, Chakraborty C, Lala PK. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors retard murine mammary tumor progression by reducing tumor cell migration, invasiveness and angiogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2001; 93:497–506. PMID: 11477553.
Article
9. Prigent SA, Lemoine NR. The type 1 (EGFR-related) family of growth factor receptors and their ligands. Prog Growth Factor Res. 1992; 4:1–24. PMID: 1355372.
Article
10. Tokunaga A, Onda M, Okuda T, Teramoto T, Fujita I, Mizutani T, et al. Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF receptor, and c-erbB-2 in human gastric cancer. Cancer. 1995; 75(Suppl. 6):1418–1425. PMID: 7889468.
Article
11. Lee CS, Pirdas A. Epidermal growth factor receptor immunoreactivity in gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tract tumours. Pathol Res Pract. 1995; 191:1087–1091. PMID: 8822109.
Article
12. Suzuki T, Takano Y, Kakita A, Okudaira M. An immunohistochemical and molecular biological study of c-erbB-2 amplification and prognostic relevance in gallbladder cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 1993; 189:283–292. PMID: 8101375.
Article
13. Cadigan KM, Nusse R. Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 1997; 11:3286–3305. PMID: 9407023.
14. Brabletz T, Jung A, Reu S, Porzner M, Hlubek F, Kunz-Schughart LA, et al. Variable beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers indicates tumor progression driven by the tumor environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98:10356–10361. PMID: 11526241.
15. Wong NA, Pignatelli M. Beta-catenin--a linchpin in colorectal carcinogenesis? Am J Pathol. 2002; 160:389–401. PMID: 11839557.
16. Cooper CS, Park M, Blair DG, Tainsky MA, Huebner K, Croce CM, et al. Molecular cloning of a new transforming gene from a chemically transformed human cell line. Nature. 1984; 311:29–33. PMID: 6590967.
Article
17. Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Zbar B. Dysregulation of met receptor tyrosine kinase activity in invasive tumors. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109:863–867. PMID: 11927612.
18. Pai R, Nakamura T, Moon WS, Tarnawski AS. Prostaglandins promote colon cancer cell invasion; signaling by cross-talk between two distinct growth factor receptors. FASEB J. 2003; 17:1640–1647. PMID: 12958170.
Article
19. Pai R, Soreghan B, Szabo IL, Pavelka M, Baatar D, Tarnawski AS. Prostaglandin E2 transactivates EGF receptor: a novel mechanism for promoting colon cancer growth and gastrointestinal hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2002; 8:289–293. PMID: 11875501.
Article
20. Jones MK, Sasaki E, Halter F, Pai R, Nakamura T, Arakawa T, et al. HGF triggers activation of the COX-2 gene in rat gastric epithelial cells: action mediated through the ERK2 signaling pathway. FASEB J. 1999; 13:2186–2194. PMID: 10593866.
Article
21. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Sobin LH. WHO histologic typing of tumors of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. International Histologic Classification of Tumors. 1991. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Gallbladder. American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer staging manual. 1997. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers;p. 103–108.
23. Niki T, Kohno T, Iba S, Moriya Y, Takahashi Y, Saito M, et al. Frequent co-localization of Cox-2 and laminin-5 gamma2 chain at the invasive front of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2002; 160:1129–1141. PMID: 11891209.
24. Pennacchietti S, Michieli P, Galluzzo M, Mazzone M, Giordano S, Comoglio PM. Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell. 2003; 3:347–361. PMID: 12726861.
Article
25. Comoglio PM, Trusolino L. Invasive growth: from development to metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109:857–862. PMID: 11927611.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr