Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Feb;38(1):6-12. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.1.6.

Associating Factors Regarding Nasogastric Tube Removal in Patients With Dysphagia After Stroke

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea. jingee00@naver.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To demonstrate associating factors regarding nasogastric tube (NGT) removal in patients with dysphagia after stroke.
METHODS
This study is a retrospective medical chart review. Patients were divided into non-brain stem (NBS) and brain stem (BS) groups. A videofluoroscopic swallowing study was conducted until swallowing functions were recovered. Initial disease status was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Risk factors related to stroke were evaluated. The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was used as the swallowing test. Functional status was measured by Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI). Within each group, initial evaluations and their subsequent changes were compared according to the NGT removal status. Correlation between the NGT removal time and other initial factors were evaluated.
RESULTS
Ninety-nine patients were allocated to the NBS group and 39 to the BS group. In NBS, age, PAS, MMSE, and MBI were significantly different according to the NGT removal status. In BS, smoking and PAS were significantly different. In NBS, changes in PAS, MMSE, and MBI were significantly different according to the NGT removal status. In BS, only PAS change was significantly different. In NBS, initial NIHSS, mRS, MMSE, and MBI were correlated with removal time.
CONCLUSION
In stroke patients with NTG, younger age, better initial disease and functional status seems to remove NGT in NBS stroke. Therefore, when deciding to remove NGT, those three factors should be considered discreetly.

Keyword

Stroke; Dysphagia; Nasogastric tube; Fluoroscopy

MeSH Terms

Brain Stem
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders*
Fluoroscopy
Humans
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Smoke
Smoking
Stroke*
Smoke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 In non-brain stem stroke patients, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, A) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS, B) showed a positive correlation, Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE, C) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI, D) showed a negative correlation with removal time.


Cited by  2 articles

Clinical Factors Associated With Successful Gastrostomy Tube Weaning in Patients With Prolonged Dysphagia After Stroke
Bo Seong Jang, Jun Young Park, Jae Hyun Lee, Young Joo Sim, Ho Joong Jeong, Ghi Chan Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2021;45(1):33-41.    doi: 10.5535/arm.20149.

Predictors for Failed Removal of Nasogastric Tube in Patients With Brain Insult
Shih-Ting Huang, Tyng-Guey Wang, Mei-Chih Peng, Wan-Ming Chen, An-Tzu Jao, Fuk Tan Tang, Yu-Ting Hsieh, Chun Sheng Ho, Shu-Ming Yeh
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024;48(3):220-227.    doi: 10.5535/arm.230011.


Reference

1. Gordon C, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Dysphagia in acute stroke. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 295:411–414.
Article
2. Horner J, Massey EW, Riski JE, Lathrop DL, Chase KN. Aspiration following stroke: clinical correlates and outcome. Neurology. 1988; 38:1359–1362. PMID: 3412582.
Article
3. Barer DH. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989; 52:236–241. PMID: 2564884.
Article
4. Horner J, Buoyer FG, Alberts MJ, Helms MJ. Dysphagia following brain-stem stroke: clinical correlates and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1991; 48:1170–1173. PMID: 1953404.
5. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10:380–386. PMID: 10971024.
Article
6. Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, Parks C, Morris J. Complications and outcome after acute stroke: does dysphagia matter? Stroke. 1996; 27:1200–1204. PMID: 8685928.
7. Paciaroni M, Mazzotta G, Corea F, Caso V, Venti M, Milia P, et al. Dysphagia following stroke. Eur Neurol. 2004; 51:162–167. PMID: 15073441.
Article
8. Kalra L, Smith DH, Crome P. Stroke in patients aged over 75 years: outcome and predictors. Postgrad Med J. 1993; 69:33–36. PMID: 8446547.
Article
9. Schmidt J, Holas M, Halvorson K, Reding M. Videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke. Dysphagia. 1994; 9:7–11. PMID: 8131429.
Article
10. Smithard DG, Smeeton NC, Wolfe CD. Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? Age Ageing. 2007; 36:90–94. PMID: 17172601.
Article
11. Gomes CA Jr, Lustosa SA, Matos D, Andriolo RB, Waisberg DR, Waisberg J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3:CD008096. PMID: 22419328.
12. Dennis MS, Lewis SC, Warlow C. FOOD Trial Collaboration. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365:764–772. PMID: 15733717.
13. Wang TG, Wu MC, Chang YC, Hsiao TY, Lien IN. The effect of nasogastric tubes on swallowing function in persons with dysphagia following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:1270–1273. PMID: 16935066.
Article
14. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke. 1999; 30:744–748. PMID: 10187872.
15. Ros L, Garcia M, Prat J, Gonzalez C, Gimeno C, Albert A, et al. Predictors of nosocomial infection in acute stroke: relation with morbimortality and outcome. Med Clin (Barc). 2007; 128:441–447. PMID: 17408536.
16. Oto T, Kandori Y, Ohta T, Domen K, Koyama T. Predicting the chance of weaning dysphagic stroke patients from enteral nutrition: a multivariate logistic modelling study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 45:355–362. PMID: 19238132.
17. Ickenstein GW, Stein J, Ambrosi D, Goldstein R, Horn M, Bogdahn U. Predictors of survival after severe dysphagic stroke. J Neurol. 2005; 252:1510–1516. PMID: 16136260.
Article
18. Mann G, Hankey GJ. Initial clinical and demographic predictors of swallowing impairment following acute stroke. Dysphagia. 2001; 16:208–215. PMID: 11453569.
Article
19. Remesso GC, Fukujima MM, Chiappetta AL, Oda AL, Aguiar AS, Oliveira Ade S, et al. Swallowing disorders after ischemic stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011; 69:785–789. PMID: 22042182.
Article
20. Shah RS, Cole JW. Smoking and stroke: the more you smoke the more you stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010; 8:917–932. PMID: 20602553.
Article
21. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005; 36:2756–2763. PMID: 16269630.
22. Teismann IK, Suntrup S, Warnecke T, Steinstrater O, Fischer M, Floel A, et al. Cortical swallowing processing in early subacute stroke. BMC Neurol. 2011; 11:34. PMID: 21392404.
Article
23. Okubo PC, Fabio SR, Domenis DR, Takayanagui OM. Using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale to predict dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 33:501–507. PMID: 22538772.
Article
24. Kumar S, Langmore S, Goddeau RP Jr, Alhazzani A, Selim M, Caplan LR, et al. Predictors of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with severe dysphagia from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 21:114–120. PMID: 20851628.
Article
25. Baroni AF, Fabio SR, Dantas RO. Risk factors for swallowing dysfunction in stroke patients. Arq Gastroenterol. 2012; 49:118–124. PMID: 22766998.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr