Bone Scan Appearance of Renal Osteodystrophy in Diabetic Chronic Renal Failure Patients

So, Young; Lee, Dong Soo; Hyun, In Yong; Kang, Won Jun; Lee, Won Woo; Chung, June Key; Kim, Suhng Gwon; Lee, Myung Chul; Lee, Jung Sang; Koh, Chang Soon

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
It is suggested that frequency of low turnover bone disease is much higher in diabetic renal osteodystrophy. We tried to find out whether bone scan images show less 99mTc-MDP uptake in diabetic renal ostwdystrophy.
METHODS
We compared bone scan images of renal failure patients with and without diabetes. The number of patients studied was 134 (43 patients had diabetes and 91 patients did not). Two experienced nuclear physicians read Tc-99m-MDP bone scan twice separately and gave the score either 1 or 0 on 6 areas; axial skeleton, long bone, skull and mandible, periarticular areas, costochondral junction and sternum. The means of summed scores were compared using Students t-test. To exclude the effects of sex, age and serum creatinine concentration, we analysed these factors together with the effect of diabetes using analysis of covariance. We also interpreted on bone scan images, as classical renal osteodystrophy, renal failure and normal.
RESULTS
The intra- and interobserver variations were very low. Patients of diabetes group showed significantly lower mean of summed score(2.0+/-0.95) compared to patients of non-DM group(3.3+/-1.2). Analysis of covariance revealed that lower score of diabetes group was independent of sex, age and serum creatinine level. of diabetes group, 2 nuclear physicians interpreted bone scans as classical renal osteodystrophy in 60% and 56%, However, they interpreted bone scans of non-DM group in 80%, 88%(between-observer k: 0.74). Chi-square test showed that this difference was statistically significant (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Bone scan image of diabetic renal osteodystrophy showed less 99mTc-MDP uptake, which meant low osteoblastic activity. This influence of diabetes upon bone uptake was significant after considering other confounding factors.