Korean J Crit Care Med.  2010 Sep;25(3):144-148. 10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.3.144.

The Values of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) Score and the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) 2 Score in Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit

• Jeong SK
• Lee WJ
• Moon YJ
• Woo SH
• Kyong YY
• Choi SM
• Jeong WJ
• Park KN

• KMID: 2228197
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.3.144

Abstract

BACKGROUND
This study was conducted to compare two models of the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score and the pediatric index of mortality (PIM) 2 score in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS
90 pediatric patients who were admitted to the ICU in ED from January 2003 to December 2008 were enrolled in this study. PELOD score and PIM 2 score calculations were performed in the ED and ICU. We classified these patients into either the survivor or non-survivor groups and analyzed the clinical variables between two groups. We used Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests to evaluate calibration, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
RESULTS
Among the 90 pediatric patients, 56 (62.2%) were male, and 9 (10.0%) patients died. Expected mortalities were PIM 2 = 10.35, PELOD = 8.33 in ED and PIM 2 = 8.84, PELOD = 8.26 in ICU. PIM 2 showed fit calibration (x(2) = 6.228, p = 0.622) in the ED. In the ICU, both PELOD and PIM 2 showed calibration (x(2) = 4.625, p = 0.185) and (x(2) = 7.616, p = 0.472), respectively. PIM 2 in ED showed the best discrimination, with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.949 (95% CI, 0.881-0.984).
CONCLUSIONS
PIM 2 score in ED was fit. Also, PELOD and PIM 2 score in ICU was fit. But PELOD in ED was unfit.

Keyword

mortality; pediatrics; prognosis

MeSH Terms

Calibration
Discrimination (Psychology)
Emergencies
Humans
Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Male
Pediatrics
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Survivors