Korean J Anesthesiol.  2014 Aug;67(2):115-122. 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.2.115.

Validation of the APACHE IV model and its comparison with the APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 models for the prediction of hospital mortality in a Korean surgical intensive care unit

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hppark@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV model has not yet been validated in Korea. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the APACHE IV with those of APACHE II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3, and Korean SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records for patients admitted to the SICU from March 2011 to February 2012 in a university hospital. Measurements of discrimination and calibration were performed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR, actual mortality predicted mortality) for the four models.
RESULTS
The study included 1,314 patients. The hospital mortality rate was 3.3%. The discriminative powers of all models were similar and very reliable. The AUCs were 0.80 for APACHE IV, 0.85 for APACHE II, 0.86 for SAPS 3, and 0.86 for Korean SAPS 3. Hosmer and Lemeshow C and H statistics showed poor calibration for all of the models (P < 0.05). The SMRs of APACHE IV, APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 were 0.21, 0.11 0.23, 0.34, and 0.25, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The APACHE IV revealed good discrimination but poor calibration. The overall discrimination and calibration of APACHE IV were similar to those of APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 in this study. A high level of customization is required to improve calibration in this study setting.

Keyword

Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV; Intensive care unit; Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3; Validation

MeSH Terms

APACHE*
Area Under Curve
Calibration
Discrimination (Psychology)
Electronic Health Records
Hospital Mortality*
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Critical Care*
Korea
Mortality
Physiology
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve

Cited by  4 articles

The Ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV Score to Predict Mortality in a Single Tertiary Hospital
Jae Woo Choi, Young Sun Park, Young Seok Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Chaeuk Chung, Dong Il Park, In Sun Kwon, Ju Sang Lee, Na Eun Min, Jeong Eun Park, Sang Hoon Yoo, Gyu Rak Chon, Young Hoon Sul, Jae Young Moon
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(3):275-283.    doi: 10.4266/kjccm.2016.00990.

The Role of Oliguria and the Absence of Fluid Administration and Balance Information in Illness Severity Scores
Neil J. Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(2):106-123.    doi: 10.4266/kjccm.2017.00192.

Performance of APACHE IV in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients: Comparisons with APACHE II, SAPS 3, and MPM0 III
Mihye Ko, Miyoung Shim, Sang-Min Lee, Yujin Kim, Soyoung Yoon
Acute Crit Care. 2018;33(4):216-221.    doi: 10.4266/acc.2018.00178.

Standard deviation and standard error of the mean
Dong Kyu Lee, Junyong In, Sangseok Lee
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(3):220-223.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.3.220.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr