1. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols K, et al. Results of a dry eye ques-tionnarire from optometric practices. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 506(Pt B):1009–16.
2. Holly FJ. Surface chemical evaluation of artificial tears and their ingredients, II. Interaction with a superficial lipid layer. Eye Contact Lens. 1978; 4:52–65.
3. Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, Wang W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea. 2007; 26(9 Suppl 1):16–20.
Article
4. Oh T, Jung Y, Chang D, et al. Changes in the tear film and ocular surface after cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012; 56:113–8.
Article
5. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. New phacoemulsification technology. Curr Opin Opthalmol. 2005; 16:38–43.
Article
6. Khanal S, Tomlinson A, Esakowitz L, et al. Changes in corneal sen-sitivity and tear physiology after phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008; 28:127–34.
Article
7. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, Reis BL. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine oph-thalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. the CsA Phase 3 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:631–9.
8. Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Roberts CW, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1095–100.
Article
9. Schhiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:615–21.
Article
10. Preschel N, Hardten DR. Management of coincident corneal dis-ease and cataract. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999; 10:59–65.
Article
11. Mathers WD. Why the eye becomes dry: a cornea and lacrimal gland feedback model. CLAO J. 2000; 26:159–65.
12. Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion of soft tissues. J Controll Release. 1985; 2:257–75.
13. Hunt G, Kearney P, Kellaway IW. Mucoadhesive polymers in drug delivery systems fundamentals and techniques. Weinheim:: Germany VCH;1987. p. 180–99.
14. Lee JH, Ahn HS, Kim EK, Kim TI. Efficacy of sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose in treating mild to moderate dry eye disease. Cornea. 2011; 30:175–9.
Article
15. Grene RB, Lankston P, Mordaunt J, et al. Unpreserved carbox-ymethylcellulose artificial tears evaluated in patients with kerato-conjunctivitis sicca. Cornea. 1992; 11:294–301.
Article
16. Byun YS, Rho CR, Cho K, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion for dry eye in Korea: a prospective, multicenter, open-la-bel, surveillance study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011; 25:369–74.
Article
17. Byun YJ, Kim TI, Seo KY. The short-term effect of topical cyclo-sporine 0.05% in various ocular surface disorder. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:401–8.
18. Preschel N, Hardten DR. Management of coincident corneal dis-ease and cataract. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999; 10:59–65.
Article
19. Pflugfelder SC, Solomon A, Stern ME. The diagnosis and manage-ment of dry eye: a twenty-ive-year review. Cornea. 2000; 19:644–9.
20. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, et al. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea. 1998; 17:584–9.
21. Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, et al. The role of the lacrimal func-tional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78:409–16.
Article
22. Barber LD, Pflugfelder SC, Tauber J, Foulks GN. Phase III safety evaluation of cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic emulsion administered twice daily to dry eye disease patients for up to 3 years. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1790–4.
Article