J Korean Surg Soc.
2000 Jan;58(1):94-101.
Comparison of Pancreatic Function after Pylorus Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy according to the Pancreatoenterostomy
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
-
BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the Whipple procedure, it has been the standard treatment
method for periampullary carcinomas. However, since the pancreatoduodenectomy has high operative
morbidity and mortality, numerous modifications of the pancreatoduodenectomy have been developed to
reduce the operative risk. Among the modifications of the pancreatoduodenectomy, the pancreatogastros
tomy was developed to reduce pancreatic leakage, which is the most serious complication after a
pancreatoduodenectomy. Many favorable data about the pancreatogastrostomy have been published
recently. However, some surgeons are reluctant to do a pancreatogastrostomy for fear of early remnant
pancreatic insufficiency due to reflux of gastric juice. For that reason, we compare the functional aspects
of a pancreatoduodenectomy between a pancreatojejunostomy (P-J) and a pancreatogastrostomy (P-G).
METHODS
We studied 35 patients who underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD)
with a diagnosis of a periampullary carcinoma (n=34) or pancreatitis (n=1) at Seoul National University
Hospital between 1994 and 1997 and who lived without recurrence for over 1 year. The mean age was
57 year, and the sex ratio was 20:15. Among them, 20 patients received a pancreatojejunostomy; the
others received a pancreatogastrostomy. To compare the two groups, we analyzed (1) general nutritional
status, (2) gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and pancreatic exocrine function by measuring fecal elastase,
and (3) pancreatic endocrine function by using the oral glucose tolerance test (GTT).
RESULTS
After a PPPD, the body weight was decreased in both groups compared to that of the
preoperative healthy state, but there was no difference between two groups. Also, no statistical difference
could be found in triceps skin-fold thickness and serum protein and albumin and postoperative
gastrointestinal symptoms except steatorrhea. There were 4 mild and 15 severe pancreatic exocrine
insufficiencies in P-J patients, but all P-G patients showed severe pancreatic insufficiency on the stool
elastase test. Excluding preoperative diabetes patients, 44% (7/16) of the P-J patients had an abnormal
GTT after the operation, but 75% (9/12) of the P-G patients had an abnormal GTT (p=0.114).
CONCLUSION
Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiencies developed after a PPPD, but did not induce the general
malnutrition. A P-G had more deterioration of the pancreatic function than a P-J did. Thus, we must
consider the general nutritional status, as well as the risk of pancreatic leakage, in the determination
of pancreatoenteric anastomosis.