J Gastric Cancer.  2014 Dec;14(4):259-265. 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.259.

Survival Analysis of Gastric Cancer Patients with Incomplete Data

• Moghimbeigi A
• Tapak L
• Roshanaei
• Mahjub H

• KMID: 2183650
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.259

Abstract

PURPOSE
Survival analysis of gastric cancer patients requires knowledge about factors that affect survival time. This paper attempted to analyze the survival of patients with incomplete registered data by using imputation methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three missing data imputation methods, including regression, expectation maximization algorithm, and multiple imputation (MI) using Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods, were applied to the data of cancer patients referred to the cancer institute at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran in 2003 to 2008. The data included demographic variables, survival times, and censored variable of 471 patients with gastric cancer. After using imputation methods to account for missing covariate data, the data were analyzed using a Cox regression model and the results were compared.
RESULTS
The mean patient survival time after diagnosis was 49.1+/-4.4 months. In the complete case analysis, which used information from 100 of the 471 patients, very wide and uninformative confidence intervals were obtained for the chemotherapy and surgery hazard ratios (HRs). However, after imputation, the maximum confidence interval widths for the chemotherapy and surgery HRs were 8.470 and 0.806, respectively. The minimum width corresponded with MI. Furthermore, the minimum Bayesian and Akaike information criteria values correlated with MI (-821.236 and -827.866, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Missing value imputation increased the estimate precision and accuracy. In addition, MI yielded better results when compared with the expectation maximization algorithm and regression simple imputation methods.

Keyword

Survival analysis; Hazard Model; Stomach neoplasms; Regression

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Drug Therapy
Humans
Markov Chains
Proportional Hazards Models
Stomach Neoplasms*
Survival Analysis*

Reference

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Death and DALY estimates by cause [Internet]. Geneva: WHO;cited 2014 Sep 6. Available from: http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/statistics/bodgbddeathdalyestimates.xls.

2. Mohagheghi M, editor. Annual Report of Tehran Cancer Registry 1999. Tehran: The Cancer Institute Publication;2004.

3. Mohagheghi M, Musavi Jarahi A, Shariat Torbaghan S, Zeraati H, editors. Annual Report of Tehran University of Medical Sciences District Cancer Registry 1997. Tehran: The Cancer Institute Publication;1998.

4. Biglarian A, Hajizadeh E, Gouhari MR, Khodabakhshi R. Survival analysis of patients with gastric adenocarcinomas and factors related. Kowsar Med J. 2008; 12:337–347.

5. Zeraati H, Mahmoudi M, Kazemnejad A, Mohammad K. Postoperative survival in gastric cancer patients and its associated factors: a time dependent covariates model. Iranian J Public Health. 2006; 35:40–46.

6. Barnard J, Meng XL. Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES. Stat Method Med Res. 1999; 8:17–36.

7. Burton A, Altman DG. Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91:4–8.

8. Pourhoseingholi MA, Hajizadeh E, Moghimi Dehkordi B, Safaee A, Abadi A, Zali MR. Comparing Cox regression and parametric models for survival of patients with gastric carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007; 8:412–416.

9. Roushanaei G, Kazemnejad A, Sedighi S. Postoperative survival estimation of gastric cancer patients in cancer institute of Tehran, Imam Khomeini hospital and its relative factors. Sci J Hamadan Univ Med Sci. 2010; 17:13–18.

10. Im WJ, Kim MG, Ha TK, Kwon SJ. Tumor size as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patient. J Gastric Cancer. 2012; 12:164–172.

11. Little RJ, Rubin DB, editors. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons;2002.

12. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M, editors. Survival Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Springer;2012.

13. Barzi F, Woodward M. Imputations of missing values in practice: results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160:34–45.

14. Javaras KN, Van Dyk DA. Multiple imputation for incomplete data with semicontinuous variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 2003; 98:703–715.

15. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, editors. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn & Bacon;2012.

16. Little RJ. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83:1198–1202.

17. Baneshi MR, Talei A. Impact of imputation of missing data on estimation of survival rates: an example in breast cancer. Iranian J Cancer Prev. 2012; 3:127–131.

18. Altman DG, Bland JM. Missing data. BMJ. 2007; 334:424.

19. Peng CYJ, Zhu J. Comparison of two approaches for handling missing covariates in logistic regression. Educ Psychol Meas. 2008; 68:58–77.

20. Molenberghs G, Williams PL, Lipsitz SR. Prediction of survival and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients: a comparison of imputation methods of incomplete CD4 counts. Stat Med. 2002; 21:1387–1408.

21. Marshall A, Altman DG, Holder RL. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:112.

22. Marshall A, Altman DG, Royston P, Holder RL. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:7.