Korean J Anesthesiol.  2013 Oct;65(4):299-305. 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.299.

The comparison of predictive performance in bispectral index prediction during target effect-site controlled infusion of propofol using different blood effect-site equilibration rate constants in the same pharmacokinetic model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesioloy and Pain Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. nohgj@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Blood-brain equilibration rate constant (k(e0)) is derived from either pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling (k(e0_model)) or a model-independent observed time to peak effect (k(e0_tpeak)). Performance in bispectral index (BIS) prediction was compared between k(e0_model) and k(e0_tpeak) for microemulsion or long chain triglyceride (LCT) propofol.
METHODS
Time to peak effect (t(peak), time to a maximally reduced BIS value) of microemulsion propofol after an intravenous bolus (1 mg/kg) was measured in 100 patients (group A(micro)). An observed t(peak) of 1.6 min for LCT propofol was obtained from an earlier study. Another 40 patients received a target controlled infusions of microemulsion propofol (k(e0_model) = 0.187/min, group B(micro) = 20) or LCT propofol (k(e0_model) = 0.26/min, group B(LCT) = 20) and remifentanil. The k(e0_tpeak)'s in group B(micro) and B(LCT) were calculated using the observed t(peak) value obtained from group A(micro) and 1.6 min, respectively. Effect-site concentrations of propofol were recalculated using the amounts of propofol infused over time and k(e0_tpeak)'s. Predicted BIS values calculated by sigmoid Emax equations with k(e0_model) and k(e0_tpeak) were compared with observed BIS values during induction and emergence for both formulations of propofol.
RESULTS
Observed t(peak) of microemulsion propofol was 1.68 min. The median performance errors of BIS in group B(micro) were -1.83% (-24.8 to 18.9, k(e0_model)) and -2.42% (-26.1 to 36.2, k(e0_tpeak)), while 8.01% (-20.5 to 30.1, k(e0_model)) and 7.37% (-27.0 to 49.1, k(e0_tpeak)) in group B(LCT). The median absolute performance errors of BIS in group B(micro) were 11.87% (2.2-31.1k(e0_model)) and 14.38% (-0.6 to 44.6, k(e0_tpeak)), while 17.31% (5.54-36.0, k(e0_model)) and 18.28% (-0.1 to 56.0, k(e0_tpeak)) in group B(LCT).
CONCLUSIONS
The k(e0_model) showed better performance in BIS prediction than the k(e0_tpeak).

Keyword

Bispectral index; Pharmacokinetic; Propofol

MeSH Terms

Colon, Sigmoid
Humans
Pharmacokinetic*
Piperidines
Propofol*
Piperidines
Propofol

Cited by  1 articles

The predictive performance of infusion strategy nomogram based on a fluid kinetic model
Byung Moon Choi, Myung Hwan Karm, Kyeo Woon Jung, Young Goo Yeo, Kyu Taek Choi
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(2):128-135.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.128.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr