Immune Netw.  2015 Oct;15(5):252-259. 10.4110/in.2015.15.5.252.

Altered Gut Microbiota Composition in Rag1-deficient Mice Contributes to Modulating Homeostasis of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Affiliations
  • 1Integrative Biosciences & Biotechnology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea. sw_lee@postech.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea.

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) can produce all kind of blood lineage cells, and gut microbiota that consists of various species of microbe affects development and maturation of the host immune system including gut lymphoid cells and tissues. However, the effect of altered gut microbiota composition on homeostasis of HSPCs remains unclear. Here we show that compositional change of gut microbiota affects homeostasis of HSPCs using Rag1(-/-) mice which represent lymphopenic condition. The number and proportions of HSPCs in Rag1(-/-) mice are lower compared to those of wild types. However, the number and proportions of HSPCs in Rag1(-/-) mice are restored as the level of wild types through alteration of gut microbiota diversity via transferring feces from wild types. Gut microbiota composition of Rag1(-/-) mice treated with feces from wild types shows larger proportions of family Prevotellaceae and Helicobacterceae whereas lower proportions of family Lachnospiraceae compared to unmanipulated Rag1(-/-) mice. In conclusion, gut microbiota composition of lymphopenic Rag1(-/-) mice is different to that of wild type, which may lead to altered homeostasis of HSPCs.

Keyword

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells; gut microbiota; lymphopenic state

MeSH Terms

Animals
Feces
Homeostasis*
Humans
Immune System
Lymphocytes
Mice*
Microbiota*
Stem Cells*

Figure

  • Figure 1 Lymphopenic condition reduces the number of HSPCs. (A) Absolute number of total bone marrow (BM) cells from wild type and Rag1-/- mice. (B) Flow cytometry of LSK cells (Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+) and MPs (Lin- Sca-1- c-Kit+), and LT-HSCs (Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ CD150+ CD48-), ST- HSCs (Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ CD150+ CD48+), and MPPs (Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ CD150- CD48+). Absolute number (C) and the frequency (D) of LSK cells, MPs, LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and MPPs among total BM cells. (E) The percentage of LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs and MPPs among LSK cells. Mean values±s.e.m. are shown. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared with drinking water controls. (Student's t-test).

  • Figure 2 Feces delivery restores the number and proportion of HSCs in Rag1-/- mice. (A) Experimental scheme. (B) Absolute number of total BM cells from the mice groups. Absolute number (C) and the percentage (D) of LSK cells, MPs, LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and MPPs among total BM cells. (E) The percentage of LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs and MPPs among LSK cells. Mean values±s.e.m. are shown. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared with drinking water controls. (Student's t-test).

  • Figure 3 Feces delivery alters composition of colon microbial community. (A) Experimental scheme for metagenomics analysis. Gut microbiota composition based on phylum (A), family (B), and species (C) by bacterial DNA metagenomics analysis. Bacterial DNA in pooled feces (from 4 to 5 mice per each group) were identified by standard microbiological method.

  • Figure 4 Colonization of H. muridarum has no effect on HSCs of Rag1-/- mice. (A) Experimental scheme. (B) Absolute number of total BM cells from the mice groups. Absolute number (C) and the percentage (D) of LSK cells, MPs, LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and MPPs among total BM cells. (E) The percentage of LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs and MPPs among LSK cells. Mean values±s.e.m. are shown. *p<0.05, compared with drinking water controls. (Student's t-test).


Reference

1. Kondo M, Wagers AJ, Manz MG, Prohaska SS, Scherer DC, Beilhack GF, Shizuru JA, Weissman IL. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003; 21:759–806.
Article
2. Warr MR, Pietras EM, Passegue E. Mechanisms controlling hematopoietic stem cell functions during normal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2011; 3:681–701.
Article
3. van der Wath RC, Wilson A, Laurenti E, Trumpp A, Lio P. Estimating dormant and active hematopoietic stem cell kinetics through extensive modeling of bromodeoxyuridine label-retaining cell dynamics. PLoS One. 2009; 4:e6972.
Article
4. Trumpp A, Essers M, Wilson A. Awakening dormant haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010; 10:201–209.
Article
5. Wilson A, Trumpp A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006; 6:93–106.
Article
6. Arai F, Yoshihara H, Hosokawa K, Nakamura Y, Gomei Y, Iwasaki H, Suda T. Niche regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the endosteum. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1176:36–46.
Article
7. Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ. Uncertainty in the niches that maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008; 8:290–301.
Article
8. Busch K, Klapproth K, Barile M, Flossdorf M, Holland-Letz T, Schlenner SM, Reth M, Hofer T, Rodewald HR. Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2015; 518:542–546.
Article
9. Wilson A, Laurenti E, Oser G, van der Wath RC, Blanco-Bose W, Jaworski M, Offner S, Dunant CF, Eshkind L, Bockamp E, Lio P, Macdonald HR, Trumpp A. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell. 2008; 135:1118–1129.
Article
10. Sommer F, Backhed F. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013; 11:227–238.
Article
11. Lederberg J, Mccray A. 'Ome Sweet 'Omics--A Genealogical Treasury of Words. The Scientist. 2001; 17(7):
12. NIH HMP Working Group. Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, Schloss JA, Bonazzi V, McEwen JE, Wetterstrand KA, Deal C, Baker CC, Di Francesco V, Howcroft TK, Karp RW, Lunsford RD, Wellington CR, Belachew T, Wright M, Giblin C, David H, Mills M, Salomon R, Mullins C, Akolkar B, Begg L, Davis C, Grandison L, Humble M, Khalsa J, Little AR, Peavy H, Pontzer C, Portnoy M, Sayre MH, Starke-Reed P, Zakhari S, Read J, Watson B, Guyer M. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009; 19:2317–2323.
Article
13. Marsland BJ, Gollwitzer ES. Host-microorganism interactions in lung diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014; 14:827–835.
Article
14. Park SJ, Namkoong H, Doh J, Choi JC, Yang BG, Park Y, Chul SY. Negative role of inducible PD-1 on survival of activated dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2014; 95:621–629.
Article
15. Khosravi A, Yanez A, Price JG, Chow A, Merad M, Goodridge HS, Mazmanian SK. Gut microbiota promote hematopoiesis to control bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2014; 15:374–381.
Article
16. Zhang H, Sparks JB, Karyala SV, Settlage R, Luo XM. Host adaptive immunity alters gut microbiota. ISME J. 2015; 9:770–781.
Article
17. Scholz F, Badgley BD, Sadowsky MJ, Kaplan DH. Immune mediated shaping of microflora community composition depends on barrier site. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e84019.
Article
18. Antonopoulos DA, Huse SM, Morrison HG, Schmidt TM, Sogin ML, Young VB. Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation. Infect Immun. 2009; 77:2367–2375.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr